|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
edhopper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:14 PM Original message |
Surprise! Texas UFO Mystery Solved. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. Oh you know the Air Force is just covering up for an invasion by space men |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rpannier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 06:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
21. I believe it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
2. Why did the Air Force deny they had jets in the area first? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hydra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. Really...10 F-16s? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:31 AM Response to Reply #3 |
36. Are there that many working F-16? The repubs have TRASHED our military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaLittle Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 03:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
57. F 16'S DO NOT HOVER!!!! AND THE PIC IN DAYLIGHT OF THE SAME THING... IS NOT AN F16! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
4. Odd that they initially said there were NO navy planes in the area |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hydra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:20 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Because they probably weren't F-16s |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I actually wonder if it was Lockheed out doing some |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hydra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:27 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. I say 50/50 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beausoleil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:54 AM Response to Reply #8 |
31. Area 51 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherokeeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 06:33 PM Response to Reply #4 |
23. The Navy doesn't own or fly F-16's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 06:43 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. Not that it applies here, but the Navy does fly F16s |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
5. so on this we take the military official version? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
6. Air Force "made a mistake"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Lockheed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:35 AM Response to Reply #6 |
39. "The janitor anwered the phone..." ROFLMAO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
7. I think some interplanetary agency showed up to oversee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hydra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:22 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Tell them they can abduct all of the WH staff while Bushco high command is there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:33 AM Response to Reply #9 |
37. You kiddin'? Shit, I want to get on that big space ship and get the fuck outta here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #37 |
49. Come On! Take Me Away!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 02:38 PM Response to Reply #49 |
56. A Blue Oyster Cult allusion? Holy smokes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 03:02 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Having a flashback? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:34 AM Response to Reply #9 |
38. why would they want to abduct their own shape-shifting comrades? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LandOLincoln (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
11. Nope--looks like another coverup to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edhopper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:46 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. Jimmy Carter's UFO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LandOLincoln (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 06:25 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Who says Jimmy Carter's UFO was the planet Venus? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edhopper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:49 AM Response to Reply #20 |
30. Here you go |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:29 AM Response to Reply #20 |
35. Listen to Carter yourself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 06:41 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. Jimmy Carter disagrees, and I'll take his word over yours. Good day. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:29 AM Response to Reply #27 |
34. No he doesn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 01:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
50. I couldn't agree more... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edhopper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 03:12 PM Response to Reply #50 |
62. Accepting the possibility of life on other planets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. And the oposite is true as well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edhopper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 05:27 PM Response to Reply #63 |
65. 60 years past? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 08:10 PM Response to Reply #65 |
70. If people didn't have open minds... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jayfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 01:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
53. Witnesses Also Said That They Saw The F-16s... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
13. Yes, this is very clear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
14. I remember the official excuses for my 1987 sighting very clearly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
balantz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:32 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. They always have a few different stories. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarryNite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:41 AM Response to Reply #14 |
41. Phoenix LIghts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 12:04 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Yep it's S.O.P.. Actually comparing my sighting to the Phoenix event.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarryNite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 03:02 PM Response to Reply #42 |
59. There were two different events |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fox Mulder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
16. Yeah, right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
17. oh bullshit. i don't believe it. no one said the ufo looked like a fucking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:38 AM Response to Reply #17 |
40. I can believe that a formation scattered over a mile... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DaLittle Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #40 |
60. Larry King showed some video, (poor) But A Pic was very good... A Mile Long for sure! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 06:33 PM Response to Original message |
22. You mean it WASN'T Elvis?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 06:41 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Hey! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dukkha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
24. surprised they didn't try the "weather balloon" cover story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 06:45 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Swamp gas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 12:09 PM Response to Reply #29 |
43. yeah--"swamp gas"! i always liked that one. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JuniperLea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #29 |
51. I wonder if Swamp Rat gets swamp gas? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duer 157099 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-23-08 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
25. Hahahahaha, that's a laughable explanation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zorahopkins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
32. How Stupid Do They Think We Are? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
33. Another sighting--Jan.1 in same area, here it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 01:26 PM Response to Reply #33 |
48. You don't think that looks like Venus? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #33 |
52. That looks more like a malfunction in a holodeck. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 02:34 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. It was a simulation of what he saw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
44. If this is bullshit, why even put out a story about it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kingofalldems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
45. Kick--check out post #33 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Medusa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
46. The military admitted to flying one day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 01:07 PM Response to Original message |
47. "No other object as been misidentified as a flying saucer more often.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 07:29 PM Response to Reply #47 |
68. I Got It! Woo Hoo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:54 PM Response to Reply #68 |
71. One of the greatest episodes of any TV series. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Akoto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
54. They'd deny it if the aliens landed and came out to chat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
61. Okay, who thinks our government has already been in contact with the aliens? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoonzang (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
64. The witnesses originally said there were F-16s chasing the UFO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edhopper (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
66. Consider, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ilsa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
67. Even Joe Scarb and Mika don't believe this explanation... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xenotime (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
69. Why are these stories always the same? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ithinkmyliverhurts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-24-08 11:57 PM Response to Original message |
72. Ummm, the answer is clear: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
73. They've seen some in Baghdad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SmellsLikeDeanSpirit (471 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-25-08 01:04 AM Response to Original message |
74. Anyone buying this explanation is so naive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC