Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush’s Iraq plan may be unconstitutional.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:16 AM
Original message
Bush’s Iraq plan may be unconstitutional.
Bush’s Iraq plan may be unconstitutional. In November, President Bush and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki outlined a “long-term relationship” for the United States to defend Iraq’s security. But experts believe that not only is this agreement unprecedented, but also potentially unconstitutional:

President Bush’s plan to forge a long-term agreement with the Iraqi government that could commit the US military to defending Iraq’s security would be the first time such a sweeping mutual defense compact has been enacted without congressional approval, according to legal specialists. <…>

But there is now also growing alarm about the constitutional issues raised by Bush’s plan. Legal specialists and lawmakers of both parties are raising questions about whether it would be unconstitutional for Bush to complete such a sweeping deal on behalf of the United States without the consent of the legislative branch.

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), a former Reagan administration official, accused the Bush administration of “arrogance” for not consulting with Congress about the pact. 9:55 am

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/01/25/bushs-iraq-plan-may-be-unconstitutional/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's unconstitutional and the next president won't even have to
go to court over it. He/She can just ignore it if it hasn't ever been approved by the congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh for cripes sakes. EVERYTHING THAT BASTARD HAS DONE
has been either illegal, immoral, or unconstitutional.

Sheesh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. &/or inhumane, unjust, unconscionable, ill-advised,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. exactly... everything.
why should it surprise anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. I have read a few articles about this,
and the feeling is that the neo-cons know full well it will not pass inspection. However, once it goes into effect the next President won't be able to retract it as we will look bad in the opinion polls here and abroad. Political suicide. I don't think it would, but that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. And who will hold them accountable? ....exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. oh this bastard is just so arrogant, he needs to be lend out of the WH.
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 10:54 AM by alyce douglas
yea sure the Iraqis are going to accept this???? NOT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. Everything that he has done is unconstitutional, why should this be any different
I hope he does it before the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. " ... commit the US military to defending Iraq’s security ...
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 11:08 AM by higher class
How many coffins?
How mnay legs and arms?
How many eyes and brains?
How many alcoholics and drug addicts?
How many homelesss?
How many hospital beds?
How many marriages?
How much therapy - physical?
How much therapy - mental?
How much therapy - spiritual?

This petentially unconstitutional offer/agreement is 100% corporate/baron driven.
Let's see who among our leaders raise their voice in protest.
Let's see who among our leaders act.

Funny, that it is Dana Rohrbacker that we heard from first. Maybe I'm wrong, perhaps Sen Shirmer or Feinstein or Landrieau or Clinton or Kobachar or Obama have already spoken up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC