Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ZOMG! The War on Christmas dates back to 1645!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:25 PM
Original message
ZOMG! The War on Christmas dates back to 1645!!
(I know, too late for this year, but I stumbled across this gem...)

http://www.lukehistory.com/ballads/worldup.html

The text of this ballad is drawn from the Thomason Tracts (669. f. 10 (47)), where it is dated 8 April 1646. In it, the author decries the passing of all the favorite English Christmas traditions which he feels were killed at the Battle of Naseby in 1645.

The World Turned Upside Down
To the Tune of, When the King enioys his own again.

Listen to me and you shall hear, news hath not been this thousand year:
Since Herod, Caesar, and many more, you never heard the like before.
Holy-dayes are despis'd, new fashions are devis'd.
Old Christmas is kickt out of Town.
Yet let's be content, and the times lament, you see the world turn'd upside down.

The wise men did rejoyce to see our Savior Christs Nativity:
The Angels did good tidings bring, the Sheepheards did rejoyce and sing.
Let all honest men, take example by them.
Why should we from good Laws be bound?
Yet let's be content, &c.

Command is given, we must obey, and quite forget old Christmas day:
Kill a thousand men, or a Town regain, we will give thanks and praise amain.
The wine pot shall clinke, we will feast and drinke.
And then strange motions will abound.
Yet let's be content, &c.

Our Lords and Knights, and Gentry too, doe mean old fashions to forgoe:
They set a porter at the gate, that none must enter in thereat.
They count it a sin, when poor people come in.
Hospitality it selfe is drown'd.
Yet let's be content, &c.

The serving men doe sit and whine, and thinke it long ere dinner time:
The Butler's still out of the way, or else my Lady keeps the key,
The poor old cook, in the larder doth look,
Where is no goodnesse to be found,
Yet let's be content, &c.

To conclude, I'le tell you news that's right, Christmas was kil'd at Naseby fight:
Charity was slain at that same time, Jack Tell troth too, a friend of mine,
Likewise then did die, rost beef and shred pie,
Pig, Goose and Capon no quarter found.
Yet let's be content, and the times lament, you see the world turn'd upside down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well the Puritans banished Christmas....
I wonder if O'Reilly knows that those who sailed on the Mayflower felt that it was a pagan holiday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Damn secularists!
Oh, wait....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yep, but the Puritans weren't exactly model Xristians.
My 11th great grandfather was regularly fined by the good folks of Southampton for using bad language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well my SO had people on BOTH sides in the Salem witch trials
One accused, one accusor! Rich in irony as it would be, I don't think it was a one on one accusation and his ancestor was not hanged.

HereSince1635......

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Oh, we don't talk about Salem in "good company" so GIVE ME THE DETAILS!
Hahahahah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. One of them was Samuel Shattuck
He accused Bridget Bishop. Interestingly, SO's great-grandmother wrote an account of her missionary life in China and referenced her Puritan Shattuck ancestors (without a blush of shame I might add!)

The accused one was John Alden, who was wealthy - when the girls accused someone with influence they were generally politely told that they were probably mistaken.

Sidenote: he was the son of "Speak for yourself, John" Alden and Priscilla Mullins. Their family still has lots of Priscillas, Aldens, and Johns in it!

I went to Danvers a few years ago and it was fascinating - and ghost ridden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Cool. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Bill Orally has no awareness or perspective of history of
any kind. :dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. Christmas was a bone that the Church threw to pagans
after centuries of trying to stop their midwinter festivals. Cromwell's "zero tolerance" policy worked about as well as our War on Drugs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. I knew O'Reilly was an old fart
but not THAT old. : - )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC