Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

S.C. voter to press: You suck

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 02:08 AM
Original message
S.C. voter to press: You suck
ANDERSON, S.C. — A voter attending Sen. Hillary Clinton's event here stood during the Q-&-A session to scold the reporters working in the cramped press area in the back of the room.

"I have a message for the press," lawyer Kathy E. Adams of Powdersville said after asking a question about Afghanistan.

"South Carolina is not what you are portraying it to be. I want it heard all over this country," she said. "We don't care about people's color or their gender, we care about finding a leader."

The crowd applauded loudly.

"This election is not about , it's about us, so please stop," she said. "Let them talk about what we care about: the war, education, senior care, all of the issues the senator has brought up. This is about us, please make it about us."

"Amen, amen," Clinton responded, nodding and adding: "Absolutely."

The crowd gave her a standing ovation as Clinton moved on to answer her question.

The press, predictably, swarmed Adams when the event ended to get her name. (Yours truly was caught in the shot of at least 3 cameras.)

Adams, a business consultant, said when traveling and watching reports about her state, "I was horrified by what I saw." She deplored reports that focused on black voters, saying "It's a new South. What do they think, we're in hoop skirts?"

As for her choice in Saturday's primary, Adams said she will "probably" supporting Clinton. She had been a Joe Biden supporter before leaning toward Clinton.

She said was "disappointed" by the exchange between Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama during the debate Monday. She said she is considering former Sen. John Edwards because she agreed he was "the only adult in the sandbox."

After letting several reporters interview her for a few minutes, Adams realized the cameras were rolling and asked she not be put on TV. It was a little late for that.

http://video1.washingtontimes.com/bellantoni/2008/01/voter_to_press_you_suck.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. They need to hear this over and over again...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. My prediction....
...Clinton in an upset today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. They are trying to make the vote that Americans cast in seriousness
about race or gender.

It is offensive to SC, the country and every voter. When we vote it is for thousands of different, unique and personal reasons. It should be respected as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good for her!
And not because she said she was considering Edwards. I LOVE what she said about the press, TO the press. Not that they'll listen, of course, but at least she got heard.

I know people in SC. ALL of them are offended by the obsession about race/gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC