Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CINDY SHEEHAN WINS IN U.S. COURT OF APPEALS/OTHER PROTESTERS OPTIMISTIC WITH THEIR APPEAL

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 12:58 AM
Original message
CINDY SHEEHAN WINS IN U.S. COURT OF APPEALS/OTHER PROTESTERS OPTIMISTIC WITH THEIR APPEAL
Lovely, She is one brave lady!

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/30480

CINDY SHEEHAN WINS IN U.S. COURT OF APPEALS/OTHER PROTESTERS OPTIMISTIC WITH THEIR APPEAL
Submitted by davidswanson on Sun, 2008-01-27 19:50. Cindy Sheehan | Nonviolent Resistance

WHO: The National Campaign for Nonviolent Resistance (NCNR) was formed for individuals willing to engage in nonviolent civil resistance to protest the war in Iraq and pressure Congress to withdraw all troops. NCNR organized a demonstration on the Pennsylvania Ave. sidewalk outside the White House on Sept. 26, 2005 and three hundred and seventy one activists were arrested and charged with demonstrating without a permit. Cindy Sheehan and others from around the country exercised their First Amendment right to petition the government by placing the names of the dead from Iraq on the White House fence in an attempt to convince George W. Bush to end the Iraq War. It is believed that this was the largest number of arrests in U.S. Park Police history. The government then conducted four trials in U.S. District Court in order to deal with all of the arrests.

WHAT: Sheehan and forty-one others appeared for the first trial on Nov. 16, 2005 before Judge Alan Kay. Assistant U.S. Attorney Catherine Hartzenbusch was the prosecutor. Sheehan, one of several defense witnesses, was represented by Jon W. Norris. Prior to trial, the government dismissed a few of the cases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. WHEN: January 11, 2008
It appears the judge, over two weeks ago, ordered a new trial because the previous one was unfair (evidently, because of an objection by the prosecution that the judge sustained). He did not agree with Sheehan that the regulations for protesting were unconstitutional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC