Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feingold Calls For Increase In Food Stamp Benefits to Help Stimulate Economy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 04:57 PM
Original message
Feingold Calls For Increase In Food Stamp Benefits to Help Stimulate Economy
http://www.commondreams.org/news2008/0128-02.htm

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 28, 2008
10:05 AM


CONTACT: Senator Russ Feingold
Zach Lowe (202) 224-8657

Feingold Calls For Increase In Food Stamp Benefits to Help Stimulate Economy
Calls on Senate Leaders to Reconsider Omitting Food Stamp Benefit After Experts Say Increasing Benefit Is Effective Way to Spur Economy


WASHINGTON, DC - January 28 - U.S. Senator Russ Feingold is leading an effort to include an increase in Food Stamp benefits in the economic stimulus package currently being worked on by Congress. In a letter to Senate leadership, Feingold and a bipartisan group of eighteen of his Senate colleagues asked that they reconsider the omission of the Food Stamp benefit increase from the package, in light of the fact that experts say it could help stimulate the economy as well as help low-income Americans.

“The economic trouble our nation is facing is weighing heavily on the minds of many Americans, particularly low-income Americans,” Feingold said. “By boosting Food Stamp benefits, we are creating a win-win situation – helping Americans who need assistance the most and are likely to be adversely impacted by a downturn, while giving the economy a boost.”

During a January 22nd hearing in the Senate Finance Committee, Congressional Budget Office Director Peter R. Orszag suggested the temporary increase in Food Stamp benefits as one effective way to help spur the slowed economy. During his testimony, Orszag said that the vast majority of Food Stamp benefits are spent extremely rapidly because Food Stamp recipients have low income and few assets, and most of any additional benefits would probably be spent quickly.

Experts have cited returns as high as $1.73 for every $1.00 invested in the program, making this a cost-effective proposal. Unfortunately, the President and House leaders announced the economic stimulus package would not include the benefit.

“Clearly, there is strong bipartisan support for an increased investment in Food Stamps in the long-term. A short-term increase in a stimulus package would therefore have the double benefit of more quickly making up some of the gap created over the last decade as Food Stamp benefits have eroded,” wrote the Senators.

Feingold is supporting other measures to help spur the economy while helping low and middle income Americans. Feingold is supporting an effort by Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) to include additional unemployment benefits as part of the economic stimulus package. In addition to providing much needed assistance to workers who have lost their jobs, experts say extending unemployment benefits can produce returns of up to $1.64 for every $1.00 invested in the program. Senator Feingold is also supporting state fiscal relief for programs serving low-income individuals, specifically Medicaid. Similar provisions were included in the 2003 stimulus package.

A copy of the Food Stamp benefits letter is available at: http://feingold.senate.gov/pdf/ltr_foodstamps_012508.pdf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. didn't i read someplace that every food stamp dollar
costs 4 dollars in taxes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Feingold
Yes for those people who have to pay higher oil prices because of the greedy
oil companies
good idea

Feingold rocks

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well thats a start
He should also get another increase in Social Security payments to go along with that if he's serious about helping the lower classes.

SS recipients only got a 2.3% COLA this year through the magic of the administration's bogus "core" PPI rate, but the actual inflation rate was closer to 5%, and is expected to rise by another 5-8% this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. This has no chance
The president wants a simple crap package because he really doesn't think it will do anything. Here Democrats are putting real thought into it. The more thought put into it the more likely the president will reject it for being too hard to undedrstand. Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wouldn't getting our jobs back from outsourcing be a better
Edited on Mon Jan-28-08 05:24 PM by RC
long term solution? Tax those that can better afford it. Impeachment for the war criminals in our government. I can think of lots of better solutions to get the economy going again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Short term solutions is the present idea
Edwards proposing to rebuild our highway infratstructure and invest in energy sufficiency are better long term solutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC