Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Universal Healthcare" to me means - Single-Payer, Medicare For All

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 08:29 PM
Original message
"Universal Healthcare" to me means - Single-Payer, Medicare For All
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 08:30 PM by Postman
Sort of like what France, UK, Canada and Australia have for their citizens...

What is this quasi-profit crap they want to push?

Why can't Clinton or Obama just propose Universal, Single-Payer, Medicare for all?

They act as though they can't do it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Exactly!!! None of them are proposing "universal." They all have
insurance plans. Which is fine if you can afford to pay the premium. If you can't, oh well!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've been frothing at the mouth all through this part of the debate and have finally turned it off
Unfortunately, "universal healthcare" has become a meaningless phrase when it comes out of the mouth of an American politician. It's used to lull those who aren't paying attention into thinking the candidate actually cares that many Americans are one hospital stay away from bankruptcy.

It isn't that they can't do single payer, it's that they won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yup. Anything else is a fraud. I'll take the French or Italian approaches. Not a reinvented wheel.
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 08:38 PM by TahitiNut
A square wheel at that. :puke:

Both of these corporate toadies keep pandering to "take the costs out of health care" ... and that means federal immunization against MALPRACTICE SUITS ... and that's abominable!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Lobbys
Insurance

Big Med

Big Pharm

The only way we get single payer is to first get the fucking lobbyists out of politics. These two probably DO really want true single payer. But they are beholden to other than We The People and that's that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. I believe they are proposing "mandatory" insurance. It will be a nightmare,
if so,imho.

Can't have the insurance corpses losing those big bucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodyM Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Insurance Cost
Just get the insurance companies out of health care would greatly reduce the cost. Not only the profit they make but also the overhead cost are so much more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. But, but if we did what other countries have done
we'd be embracing Communism :sarcasm: Why do you hate Murica?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. Exactly - forcing people to buy private insurance will be an unmitigated disaster

Coupled with the obvious problem that it legitimates the Republican position that Democrats just "throw money" at problems. Forcing people onto the broken system means that the plan will use government dollars to help people buy into a system that's still motivated to make it impossible for those people to have insurance.

Private insurers will just raise rates and figure out other ways to push people off health care - then the government will have to throw more money at it - then private insurers will throw people off - if you don't break the cycle by introducing universal single payer, the system is still broken and can't be fixed.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. .
Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 10:23 PM by burythehatchet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC