Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Military build-up on Guam

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CarbonDate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 02:54 AM
Original message
Military build-up on Guam
I'd like to draw everyone's attention to a matter of great importance to the island territory of Guam. As we speak, there is a bill before the Senate judiciary committee regarding this build-up. Whereas the people of Guam have no vote in either the House or the Senate, it is up to us to write to our elected representatives and ask them to allow the people of Guam to have a say in this matter.

For those who do not know, Guam is a U.S. territory east of the Philippines. Since they are not a foreign country, they have no right to say "no" to this military build-up, but neither do they have a voice in Congress to force debate on the matter. As it stands, 30% of the island is taken up by the military, and they are looking to expand even further. I am not explicitly opposed to this build-up, but I do feel that the good people of Guam (many of whom stood against the Japanese occupation during World War II, in the face of brutal persecution) should at least have the right to discuss the matter and consent to having even more of their island taken up by the U.S. military.

Please refer to this blog post on the matter, and if you are a constituent of one of these Senators, please write to them. Thank you.

http://minagahet.blogspot.com/2008/01/kontra-i-finafederal-i-cnmi.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Do the people of Guam want to become one of the United States?
Just curious why Puerto Rico and Guam remain territiories...I know the issue of Puerto Rican statehood comes up regularly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I believe it does for Guam also...
They have wanted statehood for many decades...but...it doesn't seem as though they ever will be accepted...wb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angleae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Why?
It's called federal income tax. They don't have it as a territory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. As far as I recall
It's part of a regular training routine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 03:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Damn...you're up late...
did my price for a photographer help you out at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 03:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It did
I should have explained more. I was asked to take some candid shots, and that's it. The people asking for my skills weren't interested at all in hiring a 'pro', and at the last wedding I was at up there I took some shots and everyone loved them. This is really little more than taking a handful of shots before and after the ceremony. Or at least, that's what I think it is. If it's more, I'll bitch, and demand more weed. Because we'll all be higher than a kite.

It's that kind of wedding. But thanks for asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 03:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. your welcome...
I haven't smoked in years (52 now) but I sure remember the Afghan Black with the opium streaks...12 grams, $20...

Damn...

Enjoy your friends wedding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarbonDate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. No, it isn't.
They're permanently moving some 7,000 Marines from Okinawa to Guam. That number doesn't include dependents or other personnel who will need to be moved here to support that move, which drives the number up to 20,000 additional people on an island of 100,000.

The environmental and cultural impact (to say nothing of the amount of space all of these people will take up) merits a lot more discussion than it's been given.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Is this because of pressure from the Okinawans to get the US military off the island?
Seems to me I heard talk of that after the recent rape incident there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC