Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP,pg1: Acceptance Slow for Bush's Space Plan (Ya think???)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 01:11 PM
Original message
WP,pg1: Acceptance Slow for Bush's Space Plan (Ya think???)
Acceptance Slow for Bush's Space Plan
With Some Scientists Skeptical, NASA Turns to Advertising Firm to Generate Appeal
By Marc Kaufman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, February 2, 2008; A01

Four years after President Bush called for Americans to return to the moon and then voyage on to Mars, NASA is spending hundreds of millions of dollars to design, build and test the spacecraft that would make it possible. But the effort has yet to capture the public's imagination as the Apollo project did in the 1960s, something tacitly acknowledged recently when NASA hired a New York advertising firm to help "brand" the program, now dubbed Constellation.

Moreover, some top space exploration advocates, policy experts and scientists, including some who initially supported the program, are questioning whether it can ever achieve its goals at a price taxpayers will accept. The doubters are sufficiently worried that they have organized a conference for Feb. 12-13 at Stanford University to debate the issue.

"With a new administration coming in soon, we have to seriously think about whether Constellation is doing what it should," said Louis Friedman, head of the Planetary Society. He was an active early supporter of much of the Bush plan but is now helping to organize the Stanford meeting. "Some of us have real doubts about whether the money will be available for the Bush plan, or whether the public supports Constellation enough to see it through," he said.

NASA, meanwhile, is mounting a vigorous defense of the steps it has taken to turn Bush's vision into a new generation of rockets and crew capsules, a lunar lander and ultimately a settlement on the moon....

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/01/AR2008020103258_pf.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Doc_Technical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-02-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. I know where we can get the money to pay for these programs

The United States has 11 carrier strike groups.

I think we only need 9 of these groups.

If we de-activate 2 of these strike groups, we will

have enough money for a space program and money to

repair our infrastructure.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrier_battle_group
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC