Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does McCain regret the US "waving the white flag" in Vietnam?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:50 PM
Original message
Does McCain regret the US "waving the white flag" in Vietnam?
Just watching the GOP debate rerun and his disdain for those wanting to "surrender" and "wave the white flag" in Iraq. And those politicians who would listen to what we, the people, want to happen!

But, isn't that how HE got to come home? After the Paris Peace Accords? Does he wish they hadn't taken place?

He's been thanked a lot for his service which he should be -- but shouldn't he also thank the people in the US who demanded we get out of Vietnam? IMO -- they don't get enough credit.

Does he think that was "surrender?"

The way I see it -- ALL the so-called "volunteer army" is being held hostage by BushCo, sending them back 3 and 4 times and even more. I think a lot of them would like the same outcome he got, in other words, admit it was a stupid idea in the first place and a no-win situation for all but a few profiteers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good point. Save your post for the GE, too.
This should be on the Greatest Page, especially if McCain is their nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheozone Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think he still is fighting the VN war in his head. That's why he
really cannot accept anything other than "victory" in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Yeah this is like a "do-over" for him.....
Reminds me of the 75 year old guys doing military drills on the beaches in Miami for when they finally beat Castro! Insert cuckoo-clock sound effects!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Many of them do. They blame Kerry for ending a war that they are
convinced was "winnable" using conventional means, bombs, bullets & bullshit. The swift boat guys are big proponents of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. His fighting days were over in Viet nam in 1967
where he became a POW. The only reason he came home in 1973 is because the war ended and the North Vietnamese let the US prisoners go home. Perhaps he feels he needs to prove something by making more wars I don't know. But he was broken in the POW camp, in body and in mind, and it's there for anyone to read about it. (wikipedia is a decent place to start) I just don't understand how someone having lived through that unpleasantness would be so gung-ho for endless war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. In our guts, we know he's nutz. He never got over 'nam, apparently.
Edited on Sun Feb-03-08 06:54 PM by wienerdoggie
Can't bear to see us "lose" or "surrender" or "cut and run" in Iraq, even though the war itself was founded on a mistake (or lie), same as Vietnam. I suppose he felt more casualties in Vietnam would have been worth the bragging rights of fighting until....whenever it may have ended. He's a sick pup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. He thinks Vietnam could have been won
He blames "timid" political leaders. You know, the old "they wouldn't let us win" bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Shit they don't even know how to define "win" at this point!
"Win" is less death and destruction than last week. Woohoo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. True that! Petraeus is the same (thinks Vietnam could have been won)
just needed more time and the support of the people....and in McCains case, he thinks more bombing would have done the trick....and feels not bombing non-military targets - considered war crimes by Geneva - to be stupid



http://www.thenation.com/doc/20000103/dreyfuss





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. 'win'
What was a 'win' in Viet Nam? I seriously doubt the country would have turned out much differently had we pulled out in '66. Although, had we pulled out earlier, they would have recoverd economically much more quickly, and would be able to make lots of cheap products to swap for American debt. They might have been our masters instead of the Chinese.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not for nothing is Ron Paul getting the most military contributions
I wouldn't vote for him because of his extreme libertarian views and policies, however, on the war he's dead-on and the most forceful anti-war candidate in both parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. maybe Viet Nam should say something...
geez we killed a couple million innocent Vietnamese- Vietnam might consider mccain's role dropping 1 ton bombs on defenseless villagers to be criminal, or at least unmentioned in polite company, or else the murder aspect of it evoked, bigtime...they should file a claim with World Court if the Vietnam war even mentioned (it was illegal, after all)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. If were up to him, the Vietnam war would have been going until 2067
At least if you believe his latest statements on Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes, less "people be bragging" that the US left....or whatEVER!
What infantile reasons these GOP have for these wars. I remember arguing in 2003 and this guy literally told me, "Saddam will laugh at us if we don't go in...." GREAT REASON! WHO THE FUCK CARES WHAT HE LAUGHS AT? Insane.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-03-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. When he is talking about "we could have won" he is talking about
being able to pulverize the whole country given enough time and munitions. These gung-ho guys never remember that without a political solution possible through negotiations there is no one who wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC