Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nebraska appeals court says drunken driving sentence too lenient

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 03:37 PM
Original message
Nebraska appeals court says drunken driving sentence too lenient

http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2798&u_sid=10250896

BY JASON KUIPER
WORLD-HERALD STAFF WRITER

A ruling from the Nebraska Court of Appeals Tuesday affirms what Douglas County Attorney Don Kleine has said about the sentence given to a repeat drunken driver who crashed into an Omaha police officer: It was too lenient.

Last February, Gregory Hatt, 52, of Ralston, was sentenced by Douglas County District Judge Marlon Polk to 10 days in jail, two years probation and a $1,000 fine.

The sentence stems from a Feb. 10, 2006, accident in which Hatt ran into a police cruiser driven by Michael Versch near 72nd and Main Streets in Ralston. Versch had to retire in June 2007 because of the accident.

Hatt has six drunken-driving convictions. Prosecutors originally asked that he spend 20 to 60 months in jail for the crash and a year in jail for violating probation from a separate drunken-driving conviction, and for Hatt’s license to be revoked for 30 years.

The Nebraska Court of Appeals ruled the sentence was excessively lenient and clears the way for a new judge to impose a greater sentence.

"We’re obviously pleased the Court of Appeals agreed with us that the sentence was excessively lenient," Kleine said. "That was our purpose in taking it up."

Kleine said the case at some point will go before a different district court judge for re-sentencing.

Hatt was unavailable for comment Tuesday morning.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Works for me. The guy has SIX convictions for DUI...
He needs to be off the streets , just as a matter of public safety.
He's obviously not willing to stop endangering people, so someone
needs to MAKE him stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. The prosecutors are right on.
The streets would be safer if every DA office took this sort of stance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC