Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm so glad that with a world of impeachable offenses and a war on, the Senate cares about football.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:34 PM
Original message
I'm so glad that with a world of impeachable offenses and a war on, the Senate cares about football.
Edited on Tue Feb-05-08 10:35 PM by Rabrrrrrr
What a goddamned crock.

Why does the senate care about baseball steroids?

Why does the senate care about whether the Patriots spied earlier in the year?

THEY ARE NOT SENATE CONCERNS YOU FUCKING INCOMPETENT JACKASSES!

Goddammit, you fuckwits, why don't you just do your fucking jobs?


http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hp6zbpT9ttEypWNRpKC4R8lRK4-QD8UKDQKO0

Sen. Arlen Specter and NFL commissioner Roger Goodell could meet next week to discuss the league's investigation into spying allegations against the New England Patriots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. NFL has a Congressional anti-trust exemption
So the integrity of the league is their business. There are certainly more pressing issues, but if the NFL wants to retain their special status they need to answer the questions presented to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't see how a "spying" allegation has anything to do with the anti-trust exemption.
Edited on Tue Feb-05-08 10:50 PM by Rabrrrrrr
Waste of taxpayer money, waste of the government's time.

Personally speaking, I think the senate interferes in this shit because they worry about votes and want to look like they're actually doing something, and gives them a chance to get autographs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rage for Order Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well, the NFL is immensely popular
Which means tens of millions of people will notice if Congress gets involved in any way. This helps Congress by giving the illusion that they are doing something productive. However, the fact that the NFL operates in largely publicly funded stadiums and does so via an exemption from anti-trust laws does make it Congress' business. Of course, they could do it in such a way so that it wouldn't look like media whoring, but Congress rarely acts in that manner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. That they could even spend a second on these trivial concerns
Without impreaching Chimpy and Cheney shows how idiotic we are for electing these bozos to high office.

We have to learn to elect real people, whether they look like "Senators" from Central Casting or not, rather than being so damned shallow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Absolutely.
I realize, as the other poster said, there's a certain level of oversight needed because of the exception to the anti-trust law.


But the rule should still be that the NFL (or whatever sports franchise) deals with its own shit, and only until there is division and an inability to solve their own problem should the senate be involved.

Fucking waste of time.

Total testimony to how this country is utterly fucked - every fucking newspaper has a DAILY sports section, but a weekly arts/entertainment section (and even that is mostly dedicated to pop bullshit and other ignorant crap) and a weekly science section, the sum total of those two sections per week still being less pages than the Tuesday sports section. Our senate gets involved in sports, but when Gore wins A FUCKING NOBEL, THANK YOU, there is zero response, except to call him an intellectual elitist and other disparaging remarks, because clearly the only people who win Nobels are the worst people in the world because, God forbid, they use their brains instead of wearing NFL related sweatsuit "outfits" to the mall to by shit they don't need. In fact, whenever any American wins a Nobel, there is zero response. But the Giants win a fucking football game, and NYC gives them a fucking ticker tape parade and the president calls them in the locker room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuelahWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. A kick and a rec for you, Mr. Rabrrrrrr
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R&ImpeachNow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. OMG.. you mean they might have to quit investigating Baseball now?
and all the beefy fat-headed bat-swingers? ..and start investigating camera-toting, lip-reading he-man football guys?

How WILL they manage to all run for election, and raise cash, and "do lunch"..and still find time for these earth-shattering hearings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yorgatron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. all sports should be played by amateurs.
get rid of pro sports entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. because in a free society that would be appropriate, how?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. No. Roger Clemons testified yesterday.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. HEY.. they could COMBINE them..and have them all show up in uniform
During lulls, they could run a few plays..hit a few buckets of balls..have autograph signing sessions..

a guy could come in with hotdogs & peanuts..

and maybe Fox Sports could cover it and have one lucky fan in the audience attempt a field goal or something...or maybe blindfold the guy and have him try to hit a fastball....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. K and gawdamn R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_TN_TITANS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. What else do expect a Republican Senator to do?
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 01:12 PM by 4_TN_TITANS
He sure as hell can't fix anything meaningful.

on edit: more government focus on where the big bucks are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. what? politicians grandstanding over a trivial issue? who'da thunk it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC