Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hungry?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 12:48 AM
Original message
Hungry?
I eat dinner and I am hungry a few hours later could THIS have anything to do with it? An interesting article I found...

As early as the 1930s, writers saw a link between nutrient-depleted soils and increased health problems (9-10).

The alarming fact is that foods -- fruits and vegetables and grains -- now being raised on million acres of land that no longer contains enough of certain needed minerals, are starving us, no matter how much of them we eat.
-- U.S. Senate Document 264, 1936

The Acres,U.S.A articles “Exhausted Soil Produces Exhausted People,” by Sam Hood (June 1993, p. 30 & 39) and “The Argument for 'Expensive Urine'“ by Joel Wallach (November 1993, p. 24) provide examples from the alternative press that depleted soils result in increased health problems (11). In addition, Hood suggests that soil fungi play a vital role in plant nutrition, that the fungi actively stimulate synthesis of amino acids, proteins, and other plant nutritive factors in addition to their well-known symbiotic benefits such as assimilation of water and nutrients, especially phosphorus.



http://www.soilandhealth.org/06clipfile/Nutritional%20Quality%20of%20Organically-Grown%20Food.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't It Strange?
Life expectancy in the US was about 45 years in 1900. It's about 75 years now. And it keeps increasing by about four months each year - here, and in the rest of the industrialized world, and even most of the pooorer world.

And nobody knows why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. It is true that we are stripping
good farmland of all it's nutrients. Without fertilizers made from oil we would be up a creek. I am hoping organic farming really takes off in the coming decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truthiness Inspector Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. LOL. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenZoneLT Donating Member (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Sez who, nobody knows why?
Lots of people know why. Better childhood nutrition (missing trace minerals is nothing compared to missing calories, which was routine in much of the western world and Japan prior to WWII), vaccination, antibiotics, dental care, and other disease-fighting medicine and technology. Plus, fewer of us work in dangerous professions than in the past.

The old three-score-and-ten has been the healthy person's life expectation for millennia; the mean age was 45 because so many people died young from disease or accident.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. You May Be Right
But it's not been statistically demonstrated.

Just think - life expectancy has increased by 10 years just since 1977. Wow! I think that's amazing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Life expectancy after 35 however has not increased so dramatically.
Edited on Sun Feb-25-07 01:18 AM by JanMichael
Getting rid of childhood death rocks the mean but when looking at those outside of that special age category things don't look so rosy.

In the 1850's if one lived to 35 years old they would generally pass 70. Same now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Infant Mortality Has Not Had A Strong Effect
on life expectancy in many years. Do the math and check it out.

The effect is mostly due to adults living longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. You were were going from 1900. So was I.
Edited on Sun Feb-25-07 01:47 AM by JanMichael
1900 was in fact for our purposes many years ago. Life expectancy in America for someone who was 35 years years old in 2002 was basically http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/STATS/table4c6.html">76 years old or another 41 years. In 1850 it was around 60 years from 35 years old or 25 years extra and in 1925 it was the same (61 from 35). This is a 16 year jump in 75/150 years. I would estimate that certain procedures and drugs have caused this 16 year life expectancy increase for those who need the assistance as well as a decrease in war death per capita. WWII and the depression impacted this group gravely.

So basically you are mistaken. The mean has been dramatically raised by the elimination of childhood and mass illness death. Vaccinations are a part of this too.

Good night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I'm Looking Forward To It!
I actually like being proven wrong - it means I've learned something new.

(But I'm pretty sure that I'm right...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. I neglected sleep and edited my post.
Edited on Sun Feb-25-07 01:52 AM by JanMichael
A 14 year increase in life expectancy for a 35 year old in 75 years. Good but not stellar.

Not the gigantic increase which you suggested from 1900. 45 to 75 right?

Knock out childhood death and it's 61 to 75.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Thanks! That's Really Interesting to Know!
I hope you got some sleep!

Are the tables that you used on the web? Medical stats are a hobby of mine, I'm always looking for new sources of data.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. From what I understand
. . . one of the main reasons that life-expectancy is rising is that childhood deaths are falling, primarily due to the better treatment and prevention of childhood diseases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think it's pretty normal
to be hungry a few hours after eating. Eating small meals throughout the day or grazing all day long seems to be the "natural" state for many people.

I find it hard to believe we're starving - we consume more calories than ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I get REALLY hungry after 8 or 10 hours...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. That must be where they plant all the vegetables used in ...
... Chinese food. :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. Bwahahaha//
Maybe you are onto something...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. Age
So we have lived longer..well my quality of life sucks so I hope I don't live to be 80,myself.My disk disease hurts I don't want to imagine how bad it will be when I am, 60, 70, 80...Also many people who get that old suffer too.Old folks pop a lot of expensive pills to stay alive.What use is a long life if it is not happy? Rich people won't have to suffer but the poor will suffer as they get older they get worse because they can't afford the help rich poeople get. And worse it will get unless we do something about economic inequality.Rich people what makes them so special, howcome they don't fret over medical care or heating oil? Who gave them the right to TAKE so much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC