Could someone point me to the recent study

[mmonk]

concerning how many lies were told leading up to going into Iraq.

[thunder rising]

1. too lazy to google?

[elehhhhna]

ooh that was mean! funny, tho --

I was just thinking "why do people use DU rather than google?" but i'm guilty of having done it.

[EFerrari]

4. The real power of the tubes is synergy. We'd be silly not to do it.

:)

[mmonk]

6. No, too lazy to sift through thousands of responses.

[Orrex]

9. Have you considered the possibility

That someone might post a google-able question on DU in part to generate a discussion on the subject?

Any knucklehead can type a few words into a search engine to get a dump of pre-existing sites, but if someone actually wants to engage the topic with people, I think that posting here is just fine.


YMMV, of course...

[mmonk]

10. And of course I saw it here, so I asked.

If one is to google Iraq lies, no telling how long it would take me to find the right one.

[malaise]

2. Here

http://www.publicintegrity.org/WarCard/Default.aspx?src=home&context=overview&id=945

Above all, the 935 false statements painstakingly presented here finally help to answer two all-too-familiar questions as they apply to Bush and his top advisers: What did they know, and when did they know it?

[mmonk]

7. Thanks

[EFerrari]

3. Not off the top of my head. Might check afterdowningstreet.

If something comes to me, I'll post it.

[livvy]

5. 935...

at least according to this short piece. I'm looking for something more.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/topstories/2008/01/24/935-president-george-bush-lies-took-usa-into-iraq-war-89520-20296157/

edit:I think malaise found a much better link!

[mmonk]

8. Thanks. Yes, that number sounds like what I remember.