Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hoover Dam...no power for California?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:01 PM
Original message
Hoover Dam...no power for California?
the NYTimes ran an article yesterday re Lake Mead could be dry in 13 yrs..
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/13/us/13mead.html?scp=1&sq=lake+mead&st=nyt

what the article doesn't say...is that if Lake Mead falls any farther..Hoover Dam will unable to provide power to southern CA and AZ... Las Vegas papers are full of the news (am traveling and can't access on laptop) Vegas has been trying to make a water grab from Northern NV ranchers to feed their out of control growth...but it seems much more serious now.. pray tell...Can Vegas go without the water guzzling golf courses and waterfalls? and do the right thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Living in Las Vegas -
The water guzzling golf courses and waterfalls aren't the problem - they actually consume very little water in comparison to the real problem, residential water use 15% versus 58%(7% casinos/7.9% golf courses/42.9% single family residential/15% multi-family residential). I'm not a huge fan of the mega-casinos, but you can't really blame them for the problems Vegas has with water consumption.

It's the people who live here (and I include myself, though I do try!)

This is very informative; put out by the Southern Nevada Water Authority.
http://www.snwa.com/html/wr_resource_plan.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Do you see the problem areas being in trying to support
lush lawns in a climate more demanding of xeriscaping?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't think she was defending it, just posting a simple usage breakdown
...:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. no need for the snark...
I was simply asking HER where she thought the primary source of waste in private use was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Uh, snark? No, dearie...when I snark you'll know it.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Oh, pardon me [i]dearie[/i]...
I tend to associate the stuck-out-tongue smiley, in association with the tone of your post, as snark...

But you go ahead and piss on my leg and tell me it's rainin', mk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I never thought that smiley meant snark!
Seriously...I always thought it was like a happy puppy...happy but a little nonplussed by the world, and applied to the poster (me), not the uh, postee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Let us speak no more of this...
wires have been crossed...I admit to knee-jerkiness...let there be peace between us...America doesn't need another war... :D

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I agree!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. ...
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Partially,
Edited on Fri Feb-15-08 11:35 AM by enlightenment
but before I continue, let me address the posters above . . . I think a adsosletter's question is sincere, really. Just a question, not an attack. Thank you, though.

Okay - back to the question. I'm not a water expert but I think it's a combination of factors. According to the SNWA, the most loss comes from water waste, not just from lawns but from leaky pipes and things like washing cars at home. Having said that, yes - it's ridiculous for people to try and have lawns here. This is the desert. It just "ain't natural!"

I give credit to the authorities on this point - they are trying to get people to move from grass to xeriscaping with incentives. For a number of years they offered rebates of $1 per square foot that was xeriscaped and recently they upped that to $2 per square foot. It's expensive to do, but that cuts the cost by about a third.

Eventually (hopefully sooner rather than later) they will mandate xeriscaping. It's not a very 'democratic' thing to do, but something has to give.

That said - in my humble opinion there are no "lush, green lawns" here. Just lawns with an unnatural shade of irrigation green with brown edges.

eta: changed below to above, because I can never figure out where these posts land in the line-up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Time for advances in desalinization, as well as work on wind/solar
to provide power to get the water inland, perhaps???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Global warming could hit very close to home, sooner than we thought
"Despite an abundant snowfall in Colorado this year, scientists project that snowpacks and their runoffs will continue to dwindle. If they do, the system for delivering water across the Southwest would become increasingly unstable."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. what do people who build houses and communities in deserts and other arid regions expect?
:shrug:
(here's a hint- move to where the water is.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. For the same reasons
People build homes along sea coasts that are prone to Hurricanes, Tsunamis etc, and rivers prone to flooding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. but at least they have water. a basic requirement to sustain life.
albeit sometimes more than they might like.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. the waterfalls and golf courses generally use grey water, i believe...
they aren't the problem.

but- why can't california do something about producing more power in their own state, anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC