Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TPMCafe: "Grassroots Impeachment Movement Rapidly Expands" (Good Overview)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 04:31 PM
Original message
TPMCafe: "Grassroots Impeachment Movement Rapidly Expands" (Good Overview)
http://www.tpmcafe.com:80/blog/ticia/2007/feb/24/grassroots_impeachment_movement_rapidly_expands_1

Grassroots Impeachment Movement Rapidly Expands
By Ticia | bio

At this writing, President War Mouth's current approval rating is about 30%, but even the hard core conservative base is apparently quite "uneasy" about his capabilities and inclinations. Though there appears to be little initiative in the House to fire up impeachment proceedings, the grassroots movement is growing rapidly. Dr. John Moffett, active research neuroscientist in the D.C. area, starkly contrasts the current grassroots impeachment efforts with the former authoritarian push to impeach President Clinton in his article: "Top Down versus Bottom-Up Impeachment"

There is currently no talk of impeaching President Bush or Vice President Cheney in the U.S. House of Representatives, but there are measures moving through the state legislatures in at least three states, Washington, Vermont and New Mexico. Hopefully more states will take up similar legislation.

- snip -

President Clinton's impeachment was initiated at the top levels of the Republican elite hierarchy, and pushed through the House by rich, white, ultra-conservatives without significant public support. By the time those proceedings were done, President Clinton had an approximately 70% approval rating with the public.

After two months of collecting impeachment perspectives, some convergence in the talking points seems apparent to me. Significant now are the various awakenings occurring within disparate social strata in cities and states throughout the country, as February, 2007, nears its end. The moral imperative toward the impeachment of corrupt American war leaders is an imperative which might not only arouse the public will, but also ignite a future president. Who knows? Remember "What Would Lincoln Do?" Such phenomena are not entirely without historical precedent.

MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. The media is trying to ignore it and many in D.C. are in denial but ...
.... there is a storm a brewing.

Bush lied us into an unneeded war, has broken God knows how many laws,
let bin Laden get away, and looted the U.S. treasury for his rich friends, we need
a tidal wave to wash clean America.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yep, there are some dark clouds overhead.
Lets hope this rapid swell leads to impeachment before a crazed decisions occurs.

Pisses me off, he was never elected and we have to put up w this shit. And they will haunt us long after he is gone, because allowing him to steal his way to power allowed two lifetime appointments to the SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Egg zack LEE
Every time I hear or see something about how bush won re-election my
blood boils .... as does many in Ohio. Florida 2000 was just as dirty.

We need to be calling both senators and Reps as soon as Jay Rockefeller
releases the pre war intel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Constitutionally, if any state calls for impeachment Congress MUST take it up.
Constitutional scholars, am I wrong on this? I thought this was the law of the land (not that we use them much anymore).

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Warmth Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-25-07 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Now THAT is beautiful.
I hope you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC