Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blast from the (recent) Past: "Bernanke: There's No Housing Bubble to Go Bust"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:08 AM
Original message
Blast from the (recent) Past: "Bernanke: There's No Housing Bubble to Go Bust"
Edited on Sat Feb-16-08 10:09 AM by El Pinko



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/26/AR2005102602255.html


Bernanke: There's No Housing Bubble to Go Bust
Fed Nominee Has Said 'Cooling' Won't Hurt

By Nell Henderson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, October 27, 2005; Page D01

Ben S. Bernanke does not think the national housing boom is a bubble that is about to burst, he indicated to Congress last week, just a few days before President Bush nominated him to become the next chairman of the Federal Reserve.

U.S. house prices have risen by nearly 25 percent over the past two years, noted Bernanke, currently chairman of the president's Council of Economic Advisers, in testimony to Congress's Joint Economic Committee. But these increases, he said, "largely reflect strong economic fundamentals," such as strong growth in jobs, incomes and the number of new households.

Bernanke's thinking on the housing market did not attract much attention before Bush tapped him for the Fed job Monday but will likely be among the key topics explored by members of the Senate Banking Committee during upcoming hearings on his nomination.

Many economists argue that house prices have risen too far too fast in many markets, forming a bubble that could rapidly collapse and trigger an economic downturn, as overinflated stock prices did at the turn of the century. Some analysts have warned that even a flattening of house prices might cause a slump -- posing the first serious challenge to whoever succeeds Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan after he steps down Jan. 31.



:rofl:



"It doesn't matter if Bush is stupid", they said. "He'll surround himself with the best and brightest", they said.


:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mediaman007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't it funny how the Internet keeps giving these jewels of hindsight!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. of course........
hindsight is always 20/20, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I knew in 2004- 2005, and know a lot of other people who knew too.
Why did the brilliant people with the MBAs not seem to know?


It was 2004 when I first read in the SF Chronicle that only 15% of SF Bay area families could afford to buy the MEDIAN bay area home, and that fully SIXTY PERCENT of all new Bay Area mortgages were exotic.

That was when I knew it was a bubble and we were in for a mess. I underestimated how big the bubble would get and how long it would continue, but I knew it, and plenty of other people did too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech3149 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thanks El Pinko You've been putting up a lot of good posts
and this is another. The bubble was mostly seen by those without MBA's. I have to wonder if reason and logic are "taught out" of those who use their degree in business and finance. It seems they ignore realities that conflict with what they hold as sound theories. I hear that delusional logic every time I hear someone like Bernanke, Greenspan, and most CEO's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erpowers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Your Response to Recession Comments?
Is this your resonse to Bernanke saying there will not be a recession? I was fairly shocked to see in yesterday's USA Today that Bernanke was saying the U.S. would miss a recession. While reading I was once again thinking if there was a recession in 2001 why is there not a recession now.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2008-02-14-bernanke_N.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think there is some disagreement among economists as to whether 2001 was a real recession.
Edited on Sat Feb-16-08 11:03 AM by El Pinko
Personally, with the liquidity crunch and decimation of equity taking place, the weak dollar and flight of foreign capital from the US, I don't see how there can not be a recession this time - a severe one.

I certainly hope I'm wrong, but the government seems uninterested in making the real changes that have to be made for long-term growth and rising wages, and instead are just growing the debt more with this stupid stimulus package.

The irresponsibility of the present government is unconscionable and shocking.


I don't post this as a response to Bernanke's comments - it stands on its own, but it certainly doesn't cast a very favorable light on his progostic abilities, does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. Duh..
Isn't it a bubble that's already burst, or else leaking
at an alarming rate??????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The comments are from 2005. Hence "Blast from the Past"
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. politics, folks, politics!
bernanke said, publicly, what he felt he needed to say. and he's now fed chairman. so who's the stupid one?

now, let's find someone who talked to him PRIVATELY back then to tell us what he REALLY thought at that time....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC