Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Well, here it is--America has NEVER had an election between two SITTING Senators before.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 04:52 PM
Original message
Well, here it is--America has NEVER had an election between two SITTING Senators before.
Never.

The only possible exception is Sen. James Buchanan of Pennsylvania, who beat out Sen. John C. Fremont of California for the Presidency in 1856.

However, Fremont had been out of office for 5 years, while Buchanan had already served 4 years under James K. Polk as Secretary of State before his nomination.

All the others had since assumed other positions, such as the Presidency or Vice Presidency, before facing another Senator.

But it's going to happen this year...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. You know what would be interesting?
To list all the various ways in which this election is different from all others previously. I'll bet it would be a fairly substantial list, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Are you being sarcastic? Or would you really like me to?
Heck, it's a Saturday, and I love me the Wikipedia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Sarcastic? Absolutely not!
I wasn't necessarily suggesting you do it because I don't know what kind of time you have available.

However... if you think it would be a fun idea and want to go for it, I'll bet the results would be really interesting!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Another thread on the same subject?
There oughtta be a law.

Anyway, bucko, there could be a third party winner, or, like I replied in your other thread, Al Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. There isn't going to be a third part winner--Bloomberg can't win, and he would
have launched his campaign at this point if he thought he had a choice.

As for Al Gore--I simply CAN'T see that happening. I just can't. Even if he WANTED to run for President again it wouldn't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. And don't we traditionally prefer NOT to elect senators?
Isn't it kind of rare when they get in? (I'm operating on memory here. Anyone with actual statistics, please correct.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. In this case, one is sitting, one is lying...............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greeneyedboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. i heard rumors that Grandpa McCave-In might be resigning his seat. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. When John Kerry ran, the news media reminded
us constantly that no Senator since JFK had been elected to be President. Now that most of the leading candidates are Senators, not a peep about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. and we still don't.
it isn't official until after both nominating conventions are over.

a lot of things could still happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC