Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Since misogyny has become quite the topic...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 07:26 PM
Original message
Since misogyny has become quite the topic...
...here's something that has always given me pause.

Despite the changes that have been made in our contemporary lifestyles, women are by and large still the primary caregivers to children through their earliest childhood. It still holds true that most children's bonds with their mothers are stronger than with their fathers.

Those first years of life are the most integral, when we are imprinted with our most primal sociological patterns, beliefs and expectations. Then wouldn't the perpetuity of misogyny fall onto the shoulders of women as much as men if they are the ones instilling that bedrock beneath our society?

Thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. women are responsible for instilling misogyny in society b/c of their involvement
in early childhood development? is this to the exclusion of all other experience a person has in life -- iow's are you saying the misogyny only happens in early childhood?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. how is the woman's fault that a baby sees her first as a giant walking tit?
oh my god, why didn't i realize, that EVERYTHING in society is always mom's fault?

philip wiley, is it you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
52. if you work a word trail through any English language dictionary, using any word pertaining

to humans. the trail ends in a continous circle around the word nipple.

true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
55. Crude but succinct and I agree wtih you.
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 12:06 PM by uppityperson
Babies see the mom as giant walking tit. Food, protection, etc. Of course children go through different stages of mimicking varied adults (same sex, other sex) but no, mysogyny being the woman's fault because she is the giant walking tit? No.

How many mom's have heard from dad's "I'll baby sit while you go do (fill in the blank)"? No, it's called parenting. Societal factors in a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. IMO a major part of the difficulty is that we have yet to grow up as a culture.
We've only been around a little while, and we haven't learned how to prioritize like cultural adults. We squawk and cry and demand our way in the world and Europe and Asia, for exampe, hold us in contempt as a result.

Consider the sheer arrogance of Donald Rumsfeld for his characterization of "Old Europe." To say nothing of the pointless assault on a sovereign Middle Eastern nation.

We could learn quite a few things from other cultures, including how to raise girls and boys to be compassionate members of a mutual community instead of replications of already-misguided pseudo-adult models.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. no shortage of misogyny in the middle east or asia
so i don't get what your comment adds to this discussion?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I'm not adding anything to the discussion.
I'm dumb as a post and have nothing of value to contribute.

Now be quiet while I watch this rerun of the Jerry Springer show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Dear OC, you are NOT dumb as a post. You are compassionate
and a real feminist. Thank god for that!

Thank you for your voice for humanity. I truly appreciate it...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. CTyankee! Hi there. Happy Saturday, too. Thanks for
your kind words and let me send all good wishes right back.


:toast: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Thanks! I haven't forgotten that I owe you and other DUers a report back from Northern Italyl
My trip will be May 10-24. I hope to be talking to students at the University in Bologna about the U.S. election. I hear they love to try out their English on American tourists! I just hope their English is better than my Italian!

And I hope you and yours are well and happy!!!



:toast: :hi: :pals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. It's all good, except your upcoming travel itinerary, which is a LOT better
than just good.

Bravo, again, for an outstanding use of time and energy and community.

I predict you will come back with a terrific report but only after you've scraped your very brains off the cosmos. You people are doin' it right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Well, let's hope. I want to scrape my brains off of those frescoes
by Giotto in Padua. Now THERE's something to see and I hope I make it on my train trip from Venice there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Fair enough. Plus, you get to be in one of the oldest cultures for which
there is a glorious record.

Dammit all, I'm totally jealous.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Yeah, I'm pretty psyched for it.
Someone once said that art always saves you. I so totally believe that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Had to be a damn smart person. I'm re-reading Simon Schama's THE POWER
OF ART and it just gets better.

"Art for art's sake? I should say so, and never more than the present time..." (E. M. Forster)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Because you have referenced Schama I will definitely research him.
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #30
45. oh, Italy has an old culture alright
The old misogyny culture there goes all the way to old Roman days; I wouldn't exactly call that glorious, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #45
49. It's my personal pleasrue to know many Italians, and their experience is
strongly suggestive that your broadbush swipe is inaccurate.

There may sexists in a Bolivian village as we speak, but that doesn't mean the whole village is sexist, let alone the entire country.

I stand by my comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
35. Dumb as a post and have nothing of value to contribute?
Old Crusoe, I've got five people on my Buddy List and you're one of 'em. I didn't even know you existed until about a month ago, and since then, damn near everything I've read of yours has made my brain hurt--either from laughter or cognitive exercise.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #35
41. Doctor! There you are. It's a treat for me to run
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 12:58 AM by Old Crusoe
into you this evening. Happy mid-February.

I hate to say it, but I'm asking myself why the Republicans have rallied behind a walking corpse like McCain. His voting record is appalling to progressives already, but on top of that, he sounds like he's under heavy sedation, as if someone put qualudes in his Good & Plenty box at the movies.

So I think we're in good shape. We know the GOP is going to crank up the Smear Machine, but I think they're gonna get whupped anyway.

I hope all's well your way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #41
60. It is something of a surprise that he's going to be the choice.
Perhaps they are simply running out of candidates? I don't know, and frankly the Eye of Agamotto gives me no insight into the mind of the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. From what I've seen, men who come from single parent homes
where their mothers were either not in a relationship or only had healthy relationships tend to become feminists. Men who come from homes where their mothers are physically or emotionally abused generally grow up to emulate the abuser (who, at his core, has little more than hatred and contempt for all women). Far more women are abused in one fashion or another in this country then anyone cares to admit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. My mom pretty much raised me.
I'm a proud feminist.

I have 4 or 5 friends in the same situation, and we've had this discussion before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Interesting point**nm
**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
58. Did you ever come across...
...men raised by misandrist mothers? If so, what did you notice about them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #58
63. I can't say that I have, but I guess I'll find out when my sister's boy
is grown. She only briefly dated his dad, and has always referred to men as "dickheads", so I suspect that her boy is in for a rough patch once he starts to resemble a man (during the teen years, when life is tough anyway). I'm a bit worried about it, but there's not much I can do. We haven't spoken in ten years because the nastiness she spews sucks the life out of me. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
66. i think that's because single mothers are forced to be strong (or maybe were strong to begin with)
and hence provide a better role model of a strong woman, and dispel a lot of the anti-feminist hysteria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. IMO, Misogyny has ben perpetuated by religion
not by women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Are all religions misogynistic?...
...If so, why?

Some early religions were more gynocentric. The Earth Mother model is ancient. Why do you think they have not flourished?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. But we do not see those early religions anymore.
Edited on Sat Feb-16-08 08:04 PM by Lost-in-FL
Christianity and Islam are the two most practiced religions in the world and those two alone perpetuate the notion that women are inferior to man.

But this is just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. No religions other than those two perpetuate misogyny?**nm
**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Yes...
Edited on Sat Feb-16-08 08:16 PM by Lost-in-FL
Must do but the ones mentioned are the most practiced and the most influencial.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. In my opinion they are.
At least all varieties of the big three. I know less about the smaller ones so I will restrict it to these. Some sects of protestantism are more equitable certainly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Have you ever read "The Alphabet Versus the Goddess?"
It provides some interesting food for thought on the demise of goddess-based cultures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Can you summarize for discussion's sake?**nm
**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. It examines the concurrent rise of the written word...
Edited on Sat Feb-16-08 08:29 PM by Fridays Child
...and the extinction of the goddess in various early cultures and pantheons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
37. Didn't literacy and Western Civilization both spring...
...from the agrarian-based Old World cultures where women were more valued?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #37
47. Yes, and, therein, lies the rub, I guess you could say.
From the Amazon Editorial Review:

"Literacy has promoted the subjugation of women by men throughout all but the very recent history of the West," writes Leonard Shlain. "Misogyny and patriarchy rise and fall with the fortunes of the alphabetic written word."

That's a pretty audacious claim, one that The Alphabet Versus the Goddess provides extensive historical and cultural correlations to support. Shlain's thesis takes readers from the evolutionary steps that distinguish the human brain from that of the primates to the development of the Internet. The very act of learning written language, he argues, exercises the human brain's left hemisphere--the half that handles linear, abstract thought--and enforces its dominance over the right hemisphere, which thinks holistically and visually. If you accept the idea that linear abstraction is a masculine trait, and that holistic visualization is feminine, the rest of the theory falls into place. The flip side is that as visual orientation returns to prominence within society through film, television, and cyberspace, the status of women increases, soon to return to the equilibrium of the earliest human cultures. Shlain wisely presents this view of history as plausible rather than definite, but whether you agree with his wide-ranging speculations or not, he provides readers eager to "understand it all" with much to consider. --Ron Hogan

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #47
61. That makes the author's perspective sound similar to...
...former Harvard University president Lawrence Summers' and his comments on the lack of women in science and math-related fields. Wasn't Summers roundly rebuked for something similar in 2005?

Where does the difference lie between Shlain and Summers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. I don't know what Summers said.
But, in any case, it's probably not realistic to compare and contrast some soundbites to an entire book's worth of premises, proposed and supported by Shlain. Really, if this subject is of as much interest to you as it seems to be, read the book. Whether you agree with Shlain, or not, you'll certainly find his work to be thought-provoking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Nice... Thank you! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
67. only the strong survive. males are more aggressive and willing to use violence/intimidation to forc
force compliance to their rules. it is evolution, pure and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
70. Many Native American religions and cultures were matriarchal
Or rather, matrilineal.

But it seems that the Indo-Europeans decided that religion is a man's domain only.

And it seemed to be enforced with a vengeance.

Too bad, really. It would have been good to see women in charge of religion. There MIGHT have been less bloodshed over the centuries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. Some had both...
...matriarchy and matrilineage.

It's been a while, but I believe the two Native American groups most "admired" by early European-Americans were pretty egalitarian.

The Cherokee were matrilineal with a very complex society and their women had many rights and privileges other than domestic duties. Not only did married women own property, but they also participated in both the fighting of wars and the Council of War and sat with the Civil Council of Peace. Lineage was traced through the women's clan.

The Women's Council was influential and had power over captives' lives.

The Cherokee also bore many of the hallmarks of European civilizations, including the development of literacy. Interesting that it didn't seem to result in the same patriarchy Shlain assigns to literacy.

The Iroquois, whose governing system has been credited as an inspiration for the framework of the United States, were unafraid of powerful women. The Iroquois consisted of five groups whose own collective name was the Longhouse. Each individual and distinct matrilineal group had one person who acted as representative chosen by women who sometimes held the position themselves. Women also retained the right to replace a representative who failed to meet expectations. One of the matrons in each clan presided over her group and with counterparts from other longhouses constituted the female leadership of a clan segment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Religion certainly tends to enforce it since most religions
were dreamed up by men with time on their hands and no useful work to do. You can tell what religions those are: male gods, male officials speaking for and to those gods, and lots of stupid and inconvenient rules, mostly geared toward controlling women.

Men also tend to blame women for their constant "need" for sex that goes unmet. Plus, there's that potty training thing a lot of them just never get over. Add to that the fact that there are a lot of men out there who mistake loving to use women for loving women, and it's a big, nasty mess.

The root of the problem is the "man as predator" mindset that sees all women as prey of one sort or another and sex as a demeaning act that diminishes the value of a woman as a human being. Some men just can't seem to respect any woman who'd let a man do "that" to her. Homophobia's part of this particular can of worms, but we won't go there right now.

Misogyny is deeply complex and deeply ingrained in both men and many women. It's going to take a great deal of time and conscious effort to undo the harm it does to half the human race every single day.

It's also not women's problem. We're just the ones who suffer from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. . .
Tell it like it is. :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. I always do, but I usually get flamed for it
Thanks for the nice post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. i learned some facinating stuff about the tierra del fuegan indian tribal "beliefs" that illustrate
your points, and maybe take it a little (okay, a lot) further.
the Selkman and other Fuegan tribes mythology involved lots of gods/ demons/ shamen etc... the usual fear based stuff to keep you in line, right? sounds familiar so far.
but they had these initiation rituals for teen boys coming of age -the women are seperated away and the guys get together lots of body painting, big scary masks- imitating the scary gods. but then, they tell the boys- there are no real gods- we play the parts ourselves. we do it to scare the women and keep them in line. this is how it must be, they used to control us and now we control them. if you tell a woman the gods are a lie, we will kill you, and the women you have told. we will kill anyone who doesn;t uphold the myth.
one of the three tribes claimed their women at one point were so uppity- they killed them all and kept one teen girl alive who was naive. and started all over again with her. and if they have to, they'll do it again.
an amazing metaphor, i think. very similar to the Stepford thing, but not connecticut, quite the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
36. "Man is predator" is hardwired into males...
...Men are R-selected. Women are K-selected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. Rubbish.
There are tribal cultures where the concept is totally foreign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. So the fact...
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 01:28 AM by misanthrope
...men can conceivably sire hundreds of offspring in a year while a woman can only manage to replicate once in most cases is "rubbish? "

Do you also believe that humans are inherently monogamous?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. Did you know that posts that begin with the word "so"
invariably erect strawman arguments?

Good try, no cigar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. Why the ad hominem?...
...I had no idea human gestation periods had dropped so low lately. Or is it that testes have shrunk to almost microscopic size across the species?

Human reproduction rates and methods aren't much in debate. It's a matter of science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #44
56. Ad hominem, argument to the people, generally
means disparaging the speaker, not the speech.

Stop erecting strawmen and converse honestly and perhaps you'll be treated more civilly.

This advice is given in the spirit of Democratic unity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. Where's the strawman?...
...And I think the snarky comment on the wording of my post certainly qualifies as an ad hominem attack of sorts.

I take exception with your summation that men are designed for a different method of success in genetic replication and suddenly I'm inviting rude discourse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #36
53. baloney
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. initail childhood bonds mostly chemical
There is alot of evidence to support the theory that the initial bond created is related to the natural pitocin.

A mothers instinct to yield to this bond is healthy and natural. The reason mysogny still exists is because women will not change their own flats. Now go bake me some cookies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. To whatever extent the mother in a relationship with a misogynist models for her child...
...co-dependent, enabling behaviors, there would likely be some associated effects. But the damaging behaviors modeled by the misogynist himself would have a greater effect on the child, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
38. I see co-dependence marketed toward women...
...all the time. Nowhere else is it more prominent than in the string of silly romantic comedies and out-and-out bodice rippers Hollywood produces annually. Yet, lots of women still flock to those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #38
46. Agreed.
It saturates most aspects of the culture, and Hollywood is not exempt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #38
54. The same way power and violence is perpetuated all the time...
and marketed to young men to remind them that men rule the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
28. I was with you until your question, lol
Most five year olds are not misogynists, so, no. It doesn't fall on the shoulders of women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. However, five-year-olds...
...most certainly exhibit prescience of culturally-accepted gender roles. They also exhibit predisposition toward fulfilling those in daily life. It is not only seen in their play and interactions with each other, but comes forward if you ask them questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
48. but men rule - most boys see that and dump mommy
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. Psychiatrists and psychologist use many constructs for the transition from
babyhood through childhood, adolescence, and on to adulthood.

Many, many others.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #48
64. That's all an illusion for the most part. I've even heard from beltway
insiders that Lynne Cheney is really the one ruling the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
51. I come from a family society where the men do NOT ever touch


infants, toddlers unless absolutely necessary. nor speak to them unless necessary.


these families are considered normal american families. they don't even recognize what they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
margotb822 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
59. Living in the past
One of my friends is in law school, and her's husband's boss' wife (I know) asked her how she planned to have a family with her career...two weeks ago. When my friend told her that it was none of her business, the woman said "well, my husband is your husband's boss, so I think it is." How bizarre!?! I think that women who hold these views are actively working against the advancement of women. How a family raises their children is up to them, so women who work shouldn't be judged negatively by other women!!

I am in the age group of people who are just marrying and starting families, but many of my male friends are eager to be involved in their children's lives. Maybe a good sign for the future...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
65. women certainly do pass on negative perceptions of woman's value in society; the recognition of
this is nothing new. women have often been their own worst enemy since day one. look, they are taught these ideas from day one, and quite often their very survival and security depends on not challenged the established powers, and so many of them end up seeing which side their bread is buttered on and 'loving big brother' so to speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
68. This post covers a lot of it
That the ways of women are what is not valued in our society. I think cycles are very hard to break, no matter how unequal they are.



http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=2879932&mesg_id=2880796
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trusty elf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
69. At this late hour I'm tired and don't have anything constructive to add
to the discussion. I just wanted to share something I saw the other day (in Nancy, France).

I've heard of the glass ceiling, but this is ridiculous!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC