Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Banks To Ask Government To Take Bad Loan Risk: Report

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:11 PM
Original message
Banks To Ask Government To Take Bad Loan Risk: Report
Banks to ask government to take bad loan risk: report

Reuters
Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:31am EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The banking industry is proposing to members of the U.S. Congress and the White House that some of the risk of troubled mortgages should be shifted to the federal government, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal on Thursday.

One proposal has been advanced by officials at Credit Suisse Group (CSGN.VX: Quote, Profile, Research) and would let the U.S. Federal Housing Administration guarantee mortgage refinancings by some delinquent borrowers, said the report.

The Credit Suisse plan would open the way for nearly 600,000 sub prime borrowers, many of whom are delinquent on their mortgages, to refinance into loans backed by the FHA, said the Journal, which cited a Credit Suisse spokeswoman.

The Journal said officials from JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM.N: Quote, Profile, Research) are also pulling together their own proposal to expand the number of homeowners who could refinance into FHA-backed loans.

Spokespeople for Credit Suisse and JPMorgan were not immediately available.

http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN1440273120080214


- So now let's make certain that I have this right. The banks and investment companies created a highly risky loan product called a "subprime loan." Meaning that the borrowers of these loans aren't their "prime" customers, they're the "subprime" ones. But when the inherent risks of issuing these loans comes to fruition, and devastates their highly inflated investment portfolios and starts a domino-effect of crashing stock markets all over the world, pushing nation after nation into recession, for this they want what? To be rewarded?

They want the government (us) to give them welfare? No, not welfare. It couldn't be!!! They want us to give them money by taking over their bad loans in spite of their own admitted lousy investment practices and decisions that created them. And they want us to bail them out when they take high risks which in the past has made them billions. But this time it didn't. So they want us to pay for their folly? And what are we getting in return?

What happened to "personal responsibility?" I thought everyone had agreed that the market forces were better than getting the government all involved into business' business. You remember, "let the market determine winners," and such. Isn't that our thinking now? We're outsourcing our army's duties with companies like Blackwater. So what happens if they go bankrupt? Do we bail them out and pay for an army? We're outsourcing our prisons to Corrections Corporation of America. So who watches the inmates if the company can't meet its payroll? Do we pay their employees and them?

You can't have it both ways, can you? Either the markets are the be-all and the do-all and the end-all, with the answers to all of our troubles. Or, they're just like any other poor slob (like us lousy "regular" citizens), who have to take it on the chin when we make poor investment decisions. Anything else would be "socialism." And I know we don't like socialism anymore. Do we???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Privatize the profit... Nationalize the risk.
same song different verse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Whaddya want? The 'invisible hand of the market place" to
smack you upside the head?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It looks like the 'ol....
..."Invisible Hand" was aiming for them, but we're the ones who get hit!!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's the invisible hand UP the market n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Coming soon up ours....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canoeist52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. 's like bailin' out our spendthrift teenagers!
Banks receiving corporate welfare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. And isn't it strange....
...how this isn't part of the current debate among those running to become the leader of this debt-ridden country of ours.

- As an after-thought, I wonder how many presidential political ads are now resting in mailboxes which are sitting in front of empty foreclosed homes....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. how many presidential political ads are now resting in mailboxes in front of foreclosed homes
It needed to be in a title line. A little paraphrasing to make it work :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. A good question to ask in the upcoming debate??? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. Are you kidding? The Ruling Class doesn't want the proles to notice this!
No one is going to have the poor taste to bring such a thing up in public!

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I hear ya....
...too bad we don't have a real press anymore.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hey, it worked for the S and Ls, why not for these guys?
The business of Government is Business. I thought we all understood this?

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. As I recall, those guys were crooks too....
...and no where near as many of them who went to jail.

- Including McLame....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Don't forget, Neil Bush was WAY in the thick of it, too.
Edited on Sat Feb-16-08 10:01 PM by scarletwoman
With some involvement of Jeb and Poppa Bush, as well. George W. was probably still too drunk to get in on that particular action, although I imagine he likely still saw some profit from it come his way.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Neil is who I had in mind....
...but I couldn't remember which Bush mutant it was.

- Thanks for the reminder...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Also read ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Thanks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. I have two words for the Banking industry.
Fuck them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Same here....
...although there has been one minor positive effect of all this. I've seen a moderate reduction in my junk mail hawking credit cards and mortgage loans to me for which I've already been "pre-approved."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. Republicans hate welfare, unless it applies to their business
and you can bet the ass clowns who came up with this idea are card-carrying members of the GOP. :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. And which is precisely why....
Edited on Sat Feb-16-08 10:10 PM by DeSwiss
...you won't hear any Repukes talking about this issue.

- And not so many Dems either....



on edit: spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. well...the government DID de-regulate...it isn't the banks' fault-
they can't help it if they're greedy bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. You know, this is true....
...we knew they were greedy from the start. Everyone knew they were greedy pigs. And so did they. Which is the reason for the de-regulation.

- Odd, how that worked out, eh?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. if i leave the cat's food bowls out when i run errands...
and the dog eats the cat food in my absence- is it the dog's fault?

of course not- it's their nature.

same principle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. It should have read:
Banks To Ask (The People) To Take Bad Loan Risk: Report

Because the "government" is not something that does not touch each and every one of our pockets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. Oh they're good....
...at the double-talk, the obfuscation and the bullshitting.

- Its what makes American business so GREAT!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC