Banks to ask government to take bad loan risk: reportReuters
Thu Feb 14, 2008 7:31am EST
NEW YORK (Reuters) - The banking industry is proposing to members of the U.S. Congress and the White House that some of the risk of troubled mortgages should be shifted to the federal government, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal on Thursday.
One proposal has been advanced by officials at Credit Suisse Group (CSGN.VX: Quote, Profile, Research) and would let the U.S. Federal Housing Administration guarantee mortgage refinancings by some delinquent borrowers, said the report.
The Credit Suisse plan would open the way for nearly 600,000 sub prime borrowers, many of whom are delinquent on their mortgages, to refinance into loans backed by the FHA, said the Journal, which cited a Credit Suisse spokeswoman.
The Journal said officials from JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM.N: Quote, Profile, Research) are also pulling together their own proposal to expand the number of homeowners who could refinance into FHA-backed loans.
Spokespeople for Credit Suisse and JPMorgan were not immediately available.
http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSN1440273120080214 - So now let's make certain that I have this right. The banks and investment companies created a highly risky loan product called a "subprime loan." Meaning that the borrowers of these loans aren't their "prime" customers, they're the "subprime" ones. But when the inherent risks of issuing these loans comes to fruition, and devastates their highly inflated investment portfolios and starts a domino-effect of crashing stock markets all over the world, pushing nation after nation into recession, for this they want what? To be rewarded?
They want the government (us) to give them welfare? No, not welfare. It couldn't be!!! They want us to give them money by taking over their bad loans in spite of their own admitted lousy investment practices and decisions that created them. And they want us to bail them out when they take high risks which in the past has made them billions. But this time it didn't. So they want us to pay for their folly? And what are we getting in return?
What happened to "personal responsibility?" I thought everyone had agreed that the market forces were better than getting the government all involved into business' business. You remember, "let the market determine winners," and such. Isn't that our thinking now? We're outsourcing our army's duties with companies like Blackwater. So what happens if they go bankrupt? Do we bail them out and pay for an army? We're outsourcing our prisons to Corrections Corporation of America. So who watches the inmates if the company can't meet its payroll? Do we pay their employees and them?
You can't have it both ways, can you? Either the markets are the be-all and the do-all and the end-all, with the answers to all of our troubles. Or, they're just like any other poor slob (like us lousy "regular" citizens), who have to take it on the chin when we make poor investment decisions. Anything else would be "socialism." And I know we don't like socialism anymore. Do we???