Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Researchers: Damage Threat From U.S. Extremists May Be Greater Than From Foreign Terrorists

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 03:48 PM
Original message
Researchers: Damage Threat From U.S. Extremists May Be Greater Than From Foreign Terrorists
BOSTON (AP) -- When it comes to fears about a terrorist attack, people in the U.S. usually focus on Osama bin Laden and foreign-based radical groups. Yet researchers say domestic extremists who commit violence in the name of their cause -- abortion or the environment, for example -- account for most of the damage from such incidents in this country.

These homegrown groups are seven times more likely than overseas groups to commit some kind of violence in the United States, a panel reported Sunday at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

In many ways, actions by these domestic extremists can be termed "terrorist'' cases, the researchers indicated. "The typical 'terrorist' is an alienated guy, usually a young male,'' said Brian Forst of American University in Washington.

"They take comfort in like-minded souls and develop an idea they think will make a splash,'' he said. They do not always carry it out, but sometimes they do, he said. "They are not lunatics.''

More research is needed into these domestic extremists and what leads them to commit violence, said Gary LaFree of the National Center for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism in College Park, Md.

---EOE---

http://www.dailymail.com/News/200802170178
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. the reichwingnuts in this country worry me far more than OBL and company
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 03:53 PM by niyad
it isn't muslims blowing up abortion clinics and killing abortion doctors and clinic workers. it isn't muslims on murderous rampages in our schools. it isn't muslims protesting at the funerals of gays and soldiers and blaming god for their deaths.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. and it wasn't Muslims that carried out the Oklahoma City bombing...
Edited on Sun Feb-17-08 04:08 PM by adsosletter
those folks were "home-grown."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. thanks, I had forgotten to include that horrific event.
and it wasn't a muslim who killed four people here in colorado recently, in arvada and the springs. and it isn't muslims in the militias, aryan nation groups, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You aren't keeping up with the wingnuts...
the new tin foil hat RW conspiracy is that McVeigh had ties to Islamic extremists... I shit you not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I am always interested in how conspiracy theories evolve...
especially when the simplest explanations are discarded for outlandish ones. As I recall, McVeigh carried out his attack as a response to Ruby Ridge and the destruction of the Davidian compound at Waco, an explanation bolstered by the fact that the Murrah bombing took place on the 2nd anniversary of the burning of the Davidian compound (another group with less-than-peaceful intentions).

I'll have to go look up what the Wingnuts are saying about it these days...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. It was brought to my attention by a rabid bushbot...
He sent me all sorts of links on the "subject" when I was using McVeigh as an example of a Christian terrorist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Interesting!
Were you using the argument as part of a simple discussion, or are you studying the issue? I've been visiting the subject occasionally over the last few years as part of my BA/MA studies in History.

There are some great resources out there; for instance, have you read Terror in the Mind of God by Juergensmeyer, or "Expecting the End" edited by Newport/Gribben?

There are TONS of good sources out there; one very good one on-line is Chip Berlet's "Political Research Associate" which has extensive files and articles on Right-Wing Populism, hate groups, "Christian" terrorists, etc.

Here is the link: http://www.publiceye.org/index.html

In my opinion there needs to be a very open and public dialog on the agendas and influence of these groups.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. ....
I only have a passing interest in the subject, no in depth study..

Thanks for the info. Bookmarked.

I do know McVeigh had ties to the Christian Identity Movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Ugh, except that McVeigh wasn't a Christian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. You and I wouldn't classify him as a Christian...
but his view of things was much more in line with the "Christianity" espoused by White Supremacists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. No, I mean in his own words
Of course his actions weren't Christian, but he was an avowed agnostic:


From an interview with the authors of "American Terrorist":

Question from chat room: Does McVeigh have any spiritual-religious beliefs?

Lou Michel: McVeigh is agnostic. He doesn't believe in God, but he won't rule out the possibility. I asked him, "What if there is a heaven and hell?"

He said that once he crosses over the line from life to death, if there is something on the other side, he will -- and this is using his military jargon -- "adapt, improvise, and overcome." Death to him is all part of the adventure.

http://www.cnn.com/COMMUNITY/transcripts/2001/04/04/michelherbeck/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Interesting!
Thanks, I hadn't realized that; only that he justified his actions by the governments actions at Waco and Ruby Ridge.

I guess I just assumed the connection to white supremacy and their whacked version of Christianity.

Thanks for educating me!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. Sure thing mate, and they were (are) whacked no doubt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. McVeigh had ties to the Christian ID Movement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Read your own link
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 09:36 AM by spoony
"Timothy McVeigh was an agnostic. There is nothing indicating that he ascribed to the Identity religion."

His connexion to them was not religion, it was right-wing extremism. He never spoke of religion or ascribed his deed to religious ideals. He was not a Christian. So how anyone can, with any shred of intellectual integrity, call him a "Christian terrorist" is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
End Of The Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Better send the cops to lock us up now.
But if everyone is in a FEMA camp, who will be left to shop at WalMart?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KillCapitalism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. No kidding.
I'm more afraid of college campus shooters than I am of Arabs flying planes into buildings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. These homegrown groups?
Bushco?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. if a muslim nut had carried out the recent attack in Illinois,
instead of just a run of the mill white boy nut,
we'd be using it as an excuse to bomb iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canoeist52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. Ever notice any time this administration come close to
being held accountable for any wrongdoing someone shots a bunch of people???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Thank gawd for...
The Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007.

Which will help counteract this threat to "homeland security" through ever more comprehensive domestic spying, particularly on Internet communications, because...

(2) The promotion of violent radicalization, homegrown terrorism and ideologically based violence exists in the United States and poses a threat to homeland security.

(3) The Internet has aided in facilitating violent radicalization, ideologically based violence, and the homegrown terrorism process in the United States by providing access to broad and constant streams of terrorist-related propaganda to United States citizens.



Just makes you feel all warm and safe inside, doesn't it?


wp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Yeah....
they take the existence of a potentiality and use it to further erode privacy rights...

One begins to wonder if there is any real way to stop the assault on our liberties...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canoeist52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. maybe this seems over the top but
I'm reading "The Shock Doctrine" and Naomi Klein says that the CIA adopted the research of a doctor that took patients suffering from mild mental illness and electric shocked them to "reprogram" and put it to their own purposes. Some of this research is used today in the CIA manuals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Ya know...
to me your question isn't so much about being "over the top" but about the difficulty in identifying what may or may not be doable, and then whether someone has actually done it; for instance, Timothy McVeigh was obsessed with the idea that the government had implanted some kind of chip into him...

Could it have happened? Sure. But did it happen, or was it simply the obsession of a guy also obsessed with conspiracies about "one-world government" who had "lost it" somewhere along the way?

Since at least the time of the Kennedy Assassination we have been awash in conspiratorial interpretations of events, some of which have left very important questions unanswered, that it becomes difficult to apply the simple "smell test" to many things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canoeist52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. hmmm.. but they don't have to do anythins as scientific as plant a chip- just bring them down to
a simplistic state, as they did in the Canadian research, then plant ideas. This is how suicidal bombers are trained
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I agree that that approach is much more likely
if you consider it on a mass scale, Germany during the 20's-30's was brought down to a type of simplistic state and then fed propaganda (repeated over and over) to guide 2/3 of the population into following National Socialist philosophy or, at least, not resist it. (although the threat and use of violence probably doesn't enter into the terrorist example you cite)

Do you have a link to the Canadian study? I would be interested in reading that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canoeist52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. No link but the name is Dr. Ewan Cameron at McGill University's Allan Memorial
Institute. He was funded by the CIA. Nine patients sued the CIA and the Canadian govt. "The Shock Doctrine" is a must read to understand this new world order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canoeist52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. link to Dr. Cameron
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Thankyou!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. Note: source is Scientology based.. . . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
24. thank Xenu for the "Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act".
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Summer93 Donating Member (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
26. Fright Night movies on Valentines Day?
Take a look at what is offered on t.v. it is all battles/war on any subject. So many movies are based on violence both on t.v. and at the local theater. Our children are taught from early on that violence is a way to handle things. T.v. does not teach them to negotiate or discuss whatever they are going through.

Our society has become intolerant of people who are gentle/overweight/brown/yellow/green skinned/poor/elderly/sick, etc.

The news must have a red background every day. Local news is only about murders/fires/traffic accidents and weather(storm central). The report on the recent tornadoes was cast as the "Trail of Terror" with the word terror much larger and red.

When I do turn on t.v. I realize how repeative it is. The violence is not something that I want to "entertain" myself with so I turn it off.

Has the war on drugs been won? Has the war on cancer been won? How about the war on obesity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
28. Well shit, an alienated guy, usually young male could be almost anyone!
Better start locking us all up right now! Just to be safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC