Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wanna Be Able to straighten out your Republican friends, family & coworkers on Money Issues?!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 04:19 AM
Original message
Wanna Be Able to straighten out your Republican friends, family & coworkers on Money Issues?!
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 04:22 AM by TexasObserver
In a GDP thread, a poster raised some questions that often arise in discussions during our primaries, and more importantly, once we square off against the Republicans for the fall. This is a post which should help all DUers address questions and positions raised by others in political discussions. I want the GD crowd to be able to use this, which might help you convince others Democrats can do them the most good, and why.

Republicans love to claim they know business better and are better for the economy. It's a lie. They're terrible when they run things, because the are irresponsible in spending and taxing policies, and here is your answer to issues they often present.

I prepared this tonight because a poster asked these questions. I want to give it a chance for full review by DUers and don't mind if you print this up and use it as a handy reference for your discussions with others about Democratic versus Republican economics.

We always need to be ready to persuade those relatives, friends, and coworkers that Democrats will do better for the economy than Republicans.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Question:
How bad is the economy?


Answer:
Bad. If you will look at the Dow Jones Industrial Average, you will see that since Bush took office, the DJIA has risen (in dollars, not real, inflated dollars) under 9%, or a little over 1% per year. This is pathetic, even if there were no inflation and no diminution in the value of the US dollar.

What this means is that you if you invested $1000 in the DJIA, on average, on January 20, 2001, the day Bush took office, and let it ride for 7 years, you would now have $1090 to show for it in value.

If you had invested your $1000 in something really safe, like tax free bonds, paying maybe 5% per annum, you would have over $1350 in value now, and in fact, given your ability to reinvest the the $50 it was throwing you each year, you'd have closer to $1400. When really safe bonds are outperforming the stock market that badly, the economy is really bad.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Question:
I keep hearing candidates and surrogates talking about the economy crisis, but I personally have not been affected. Should I be concerned?


Answer:
Yes, if you paying your own gasoline, insurance, rent, groceries, medical, and health insurance. Gasoline has more than doubled since Bush took office, and all things that rely on energy costs have seen concomitant increases in costs. Because the economy has been sick, Americans, like their government, have gone precariously in debt. In the past three years, Americans have had their debt exceed their savings, the first years that has happened since the early 1930s.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Question:
I know a lot of people are losing their homes due to the sub-prime mortgages, but didn't that actually start months and months ago?


Answer:
It started years ago, as the Federal Reserve Board (the FED) kept interest rates artificially low, and the government allowed lenders to offer Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARMs) which gave consumers below market rates with a step up at a point in the future. Those loans started rolling over last year, and consumers couldn't pay the stepped up rate. To further complicate the mess, bonds were created to finance such lending, and those bonds were insured. Now the lenders, the bonds, and the bond insurers are all fiscally on the ledge because the properties supporting the original loans are over-leveraged, and many are going into default. There will be at least a million home foreclosures this year, and that means 3000 families on the street every day from foreclosure.

Nothing can stop it. The problem cannot be fixed because true wages in the US have fallen, and in real dollars, the average person has less buying power. They can't stop paying for food, or gasoline, or car note, or medical bills, or health insurance, or clothes, etc. They can default on their home loans and move into something smaller for lease.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Question:
I don't have money invested in stocks, so maybe that's why I haven't been affected by the downturn in the stock market, but doesn't the market always have valleys and peaks, I mean, it can't always be at a peak, that couldn't be healthy!?


Answer:
You have been affected, you just don't know it. As stock values fall, so do the financial statements of individuals who hold those stocks. The entire value of the holdings of US citizens drops, and that drop reduces the security banks have, and that makes banks nervous. The Comptroller of the Currency sends bank examiners to banks to determine their bad loans, and they require those loans to be written off against each bank's capital. A bank can loan money based upon a multiple of its capital, so when the capital is reduced, the loans a bank can make or have out are reduced by a factor approximately ten times the amount of the loan written off. As banks experience this, they literally have less money they can lend.

Because the FED has tried since last August to artificially keep the DJIA and other indexes above recession levels, the US dollar has fallen badly in its currency exchange rate with foreign currencies. As an example, the Canadian dollar has risen 65% against the US dollar since Bush took office. If you had simply taken $1000 the day Bush took office and bought Canadian dollars, they would be worth about $1700 US dollars today.

If you had bought gold on the first day Bush took office for $1000, it would worth close to $3000 today. These examples I am giving you are designed to show just how badly our economy is really doing.

The number of uber rich have grown. The number in poverty have grown. The middle has shrunk.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Question:
Also, has anyone else thought about the fact that Bill's presidency was during the Internet Bubble and perhaps that might have something to do with the positive turns in the economy during his presidency?


Answer:
That is a straight up rightwing talking point. Let me knock it down. The tech boom was one aspect of the success of the Clinton era economy, but it's much more than that. The balanced budget gave the economy a strong base, and made the dollar strong. Avoiding nasty wars in the mideast kept oil prices below $30 a barrel, and that kept all costs down, since energy costs are built into everything. We had a peace dividend from the end of the Soviet Union, and that allowed us to save money on defense items. As the economy remained solid, more Americans had more money, and real disposal income increased, unlike under Bush.

The internet bubble, as reflected in the NASDAQ, one major index, began its decline in summer 2000, but the drop in the DOW didn't occur until Bush took over in 2001 and began his tax cut for the wealthy. This meant we would have deficit spending, and meant the government would have to borrow more money to cover that deficit, which is both inflationary and makes the US dollar less sound. The decline began, and was exacerbated in August by the fall of Enron, and by 9/11 the next month. The 9/11 losses were quickly recouped, however. It was the 2003 invasion of Iraq which really set things on the wrong path.

The Iraq war simultaneously drove spending UP, the deficit UP, and the cost of oil UP. All of these together hurt the US economy.

Because the US dollar has been weakened by the various Bush actions, it has lost value against the Euro and other currencies, which make the US dollar less attractive as a currency to hold by foreign countries.

In summary, Bush has made a mess of the US economy, the value of the DOW and NASDAQ, in real dollars, is greatly reduced from what it was 7 years ago, the number of wealthy and the number in poverty have grown vastly, and ordinary Americans have less disposable income and less in real dollars.

We are worse off than we were 7 years ago, a lot worse.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
China_cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Those who are not yet feeling the pinch
also need to be reminded that their pension funds (if they are lucky enough to be vested in one) are tied to the stock market and what they are counting on to sustain them after retirement might end up not being enough to take the bus to the welfare office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikekohr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Republican versus Democratic Record -GDP-
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 05:21 AM by mikekohr
REAL GDP RECORD DEMOCRAT VERSUS REPUBLICAN



Truman +6.7%
Eisenhower +2.5%
Kennedy-Johnson +5.2%
Nixon-Ford + 2.7%
Carter +3.4%
Reagan +3.4%
Bush I +1.9%
Clinton +3.6%
Bush II +2.6%





THREE BEST RECORDS

Truman +6.7%
Kennedy/Johnson +5.2%
Clinton +3.6%


THREE WORST RECORDS:

George H.W.Bush +1.9%
Eisenhower +2.5%
George W. Bush +2.6%


9 of the last 10 recessions have occurred under Republican administrations, including the Reagan Recession of 1982-83, the most severe and protracted economic slow down since the Republican gifted Great Depression of 1929.

Compiled by mike kohr 2/6/2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You are correct!! Your figures are also great info for our side.
Those figures directly rebut the Republican saw that they are good for the economy. The sad truth is that with the fox guarding the hen house, the economy is not served.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikekohr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. RESULTS MATTER! the 60 year record of Republican economic failure and Democratic success
“THE PARTY WITH THE BEST RECORD OF SERVING REPUBLICAN ECONOMIC VALUES IS THE DEMOCRATS, AND IT ISN’T EVEN CLOSE!” -Michael Kingsley-


1). FEDERAL SPENDING: since 1960 Republicans increased Federal Spending by 71% more than have Democrats

2). FEDERAL DEBT: since 1960 Republicans have increased the National debt by 100% more per year than have Democrats.

3). GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT: since 1921, adjusted for inflation, Democrats out-produce Republicans by 43% . Starting in 1940 the Democratic advantage is 23% better.

4). REAL PER CAPITA INCOME: since 1960 Democrats have outperformed Republicans by 30%. (This is perhaps the most important economic statistic of all)

5). INFLATION: since 1960, Democrats outperform Republicans 3.13% to 3.89%

6). UNEMPLOYMENT: since 1960 it decreases in an average Democratic year by 0.3% to 5.33%, and increases in average Republican year by 1.1% to 6.38%.

7). JOB CREATION: from 1945 to 2003, Democrats produced 174,200 jobs per month, Republicans have only produced 60,600 per month. Every time a Democrat succeeds a Republican, job creation soars. Every time a Republican succeeds a Democrat job creation plummets. NO EXCEPTIONS!

8). DOW JONES AVERAGE: since 1921 the DOW has increased by 52% more under Democratic administrations

9). THE BOND MARKET: since 1940 the value of 10 year Treasury bonds rose 1.2% under Democrats and fell 0.5% under Republicans


SOURCES-Bureau of Labor Statistics, Economic Policy Institute, Christian Science Monitor, “The Los Angles Times -Michael Kingsley-

by mike kohr 3/7/2006

RESULTS MATTER, VOTE DEMOCRATIC!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Very good list of important stats, Mike. This is the kind of thing I hoped to have added here.
DUers understand politics, but in my lurking at GD and GDP all last year, I noticed that on matters or economics and finance, there are a number of readers who don't really have these kind of facts and stats at the ready.

I thought it would be great to have a thread where knowledgeable folks could add comments and help give some good talking points for our side.

I've noticed the business shows on TV and radio are starting to run their anti-Democratic theme shows and propaganda, so it's time for us to start arming Democrats for those discussions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisainmilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
55. Excellent account
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Excellent point. Retirement funds are taking a major hit.
Aren't we all glad we didn't let them get away with the scheme to invest Social Security in financial markets?

Retirees are really facing problems, because the cost of living increases they get are no where near the actual cost of living increases. Like many such numbers, COLA is badly understated for those who are on the lower end of the economic scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. IF there's welfare
There might not be any. Maybe we'll have debtors' prisons instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. If they Republicans had their way, we would have debtors' prisons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. K'd & R'd and Bookmarked
and just in time for me to go to my conference, where I'm sure to meet nothing but a bunch of ivory tower corporate republicans.

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thanks. Remember - R's have had the big deficit spending, not Democrats.
There are only two presidents the past 32 years who have balanced the budget:

Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton.

Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II never once balanced the budget, and in all of American history, among all presidents, the top three deficit spenders are Bush II, Reagan, and Bush I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jus_the_facts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. All that goes in one ear and out the other.... then they'll just PRAY it goes away ...
....doesn't take a Rhodes Scholar or Stock Market analyst to figure that out. :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Well, it helps to have some substance when addressing economic issues
I am hopeful that those who understand such matters will contribute their thoughts in this thread.

I hate seeing Democrats who can't discuss economics well enough to address basic concepts of business as they relate to politics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
59. I think you are right for now..
... but a year from now the mess we're in will be affecting most people and it will be hard to ignore.

A lot of folks are going to have the scales removed from their eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #59
66. Between now and the election in November, 750,000 homes will be foreclosed.
That's going to be maybe 2,000,000 or more Americans losing their home between now and then, because for every home that goes into foreclosure, 2-6 family members also get tossed out.

The thunder of this bad economy will be greater then than now. It's going to be a big issue for us this cycle, at all levels of federal and state government, because foreclosure laws are mainly STATE, not federal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. a picture is worth a thousand words
Well, let's see. Our banks have no money to lend, and our economy is based on debt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Thank you. This is why the Fed dropping the discount rate cannot fix it.
As bank capital drops, they can't loan more, no matter how low the rates are, and if the economic activity isn't there to support loan repayment, the loan lacks economic substance.

Thanks for the graph. Add more as you see fit. I would like to make this thread a ready reference for economic and finance issues, which are great for us, if we will use them, and if we can get enough of our people talking about them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #15
25. Banks also WON'T loan more
They don't want to lend out their money at low interest rates. Not enough profit for them. Even small private student loans have dried up - the only ones available are variable rate ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. They won't loan because they worry about repayment, and have lower loan limits now.
They have to have about a 4 point spread between their discount rate and the interest they charge.

When they write off loans, their bank capital drops and that means they have less money to loan, and it's not just the written off loans, it's 10-11 times the amount of written off loans.

If a bank has to write off $100,000,000 in loans, it not only loses that, it loses the ability to make $1 billion in loans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #15
26. Also visit the Economy Forum
People are getting their credit cards and equity lines of credit cancelled for no good reason, except the banks have no money to lend. They are also raising rates and thinking of new ways to gouge their customers, to try to make money any way possible. The Fed lowering the rates can help if it gives the banks a chance to rebuild reserves, by borrowing at a low Fed discount rate, and then, say, investing in government bonds. This worked in the early 90s, but the numbers aren't there at this point, for this to work. It is genuinely frightening. I just posted this graph in the Economy forum too. I like to follow the open market operations of the Fed, and they apparently aren't being as accomodative as most think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. Equity lines are being cancelled because the value of the homes are dropping, thus the security ...
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 11:13 AM by TexasObserver
... for the equity line is dropping, and the lender no longer feels it can extend credit. This is tied to the real estate bust, which is dragging down home values. Every foreclosure in your area makes your home worth a little less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. that is only partly it
Visa card line of credits are contracting--they don't directly have anything to do with home equity. Credit is contracting in general, not just home equity lines of credit.

Interest rates on credit cards are going up, even while the Fed is lowering rates. So, lots of people aren't willing to charge more stuff on their credit cards. The banks don't care, because they don't have much money to lend anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. If they don't pass thru the rate cuts, they shouldn't get the rate cuts. You're right.
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 11:41 AM by TexasObserver
And to quote Daffy Duck, it's DE-SPIC-A-BLE!!

If we had a real president and a FED chair who wasn't a Bush toadie, we'd have some action to require banks to cut the interest rates on cards. But they are gougers, and they do as they've always done, which is gouge consumers when they most need a break.

Oh, but the banks can't fail. The borrowers can be forced into bankruptcy, thrown out of the their homes, and have their cars repossessed, but God Forbid the bank should fail. That protects the banks' owners' equity, which is the last thing that should receive protection. Everyone makes a bet, but only the bankers get protected from losing theirs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Celebration Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. the banks are desperate!!
I think this shows their desperation, rather than just wanting to gouge. They are really ticking off their very customers, and in ordinary circumstances, they wouldn't want to do that.

Banks probably should not have been deregulated. We didn't heed the lessons of the depression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
12. Bookmarked.



Saved for future reference. I know the need will arise.


Thanks.

:thumbsup: :hi: :thumbsup:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Great. That's what it's here for. Add anything you've got or ask anything you need to know.
thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
13. Republicans are terrible at business because they're only interested
in short-term results and the process they use is based on who you know, not what you know. When they make a mistake, they also are good at using those connections to traumatize their victims so their victims never get enough traction to come after them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. The lesson of history is that all that Republican greed unfettered by regulation, is bad.
It's like giving a kid money with no limitations or controls. Bush has lived his life that way, and that's how he's run this government. Put it on the card, and let someone else worry about whether it ever gets paid back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. The lesson of history is that they never learn from the lessons of history.
Until someone exposes their networks and shames them in their socks, the networks are a way of life that will continue to take on new members through their system of barter and bribes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Problem is that Republicans tend to do a better job than we do of convincing voters who does better
They have the MSM and Talk radio repeating their claims, and most people are swayed, just as with marketing. Coca cola really isn't better, but it's convinced people it is with marketing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. Yes, marketing.
They hide behind the cross and they hide behind the flag. They hide behind the good works of the Rotary Club or the Chamber of Commerce, and all these things people have accepted as firm foundations in our society, which is why they can't bring themselves to criticize them. They hide well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
48. They strted buying all the corporate media in the 80s so they could control the message
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
14. Enthusiastically K and R! May I forward this? I'll credit you as I know you on DU.
EXCELLENT stuff, just excellent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Please to use it. No attribution needed. Wrote it off the top of my head.
There are other good posts above with great info, and those are good, too.

We have great economic arguments this time, far better than we had in '92. I want to see DUers be able to capitalize on that as we encounter Republicans who are always ready to claim financial superiority.

They have two themes - the claim they're safer in foreign policy and the claim they're better in economics. We need to knock down both claims convincingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
17. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
42. thanks ... Economics is better under Democrats is a theme we need to HAMMER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
20. Damn good post! Damn fine screen-name, too!
The Texas Observer is one of my all-time favorite publications.

K&R + Bookmarked

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #20
31. the Texas Observer is the greatest publication in Texas!!
If I do say so myself!

Thanks for acknowledging it!

LCRA ... Lower Colorado River Authority, the entity which controls much of the central Texas watershed, it's creeks and rivers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
27. I just sent this out to my email contacts under the subject "It's the Economy Stupid!"
thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. Great! It is the economy stupid, THE SEQUEL. It's so much worse now than in '92, too.
But the Bushies have lied so thoroughly, used so many bogus figures, fudged them so long, that the reality of how bad it is has been cloaked by those machinations.

The unemployment figures are the biggest lie they put out, too. It's been at least 7%, but they cook the numbers and simply don't count many who have fallen off the unemployment benefits rolls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. i became unemployed after 9/11 and opened a biz
worked that for 5 years then moved here, where I am now again unemployed

never signed up for benefits, so I just one of many never counted in their figures...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. Yours is the classic story of the UNCOUNTED on unemployment
There are many who are classified now as self employed who are unemployed and trying to make ends meet as best they can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
32. Excellent reality check. Anyone that would vote to continue this bullshit is out of their
fucking mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. We have to bring the fight to them on this. Bush et al have conspired against us for political gain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #37
64. "If you're wait'n on me you're wast'n time."
Willy Nelson in the best movie he ever made, but can't think of the name at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #37
68. Barbarosa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
39. k&r
Nicely done.

:toast:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
40. Nice post that many could use to examine the real truth
and disarm any arguments from the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #40
47. Yes! We have the FACTS on ECONOMICS. Democratic presidents are better.
Democrats balance the budget. Republicans don't.

Democrats build surpluses. Republicans build deficits.

Democrats create jobs. Republicans lose jobs to foreign countries.

Democrats grow the economy. Republicans grow their own wallets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
43. Not great news, but much better reading than the horsehockey flying in GDP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. GD = Rolling Stones Concert ... GDP = Megadeath concert
I'm doing my penance here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
44. How about some info on health care?
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 07:30 PM by Wetzelbill
Such as rise in premiums? Numbers of people with and without? I'd like to see that. I took a class on health care policy, and I know some of the basics, especially recently, but we never went over anything that could be deemed as partisan, such as the differences between Republicans and Dems etc.

Oh yeah, K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #44
57. thanks Wetzelbill.
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 07:36 AM by TexasObserver
About Health Care. I agree. We need to develop some good talking points on that. Since that is a contentious issue between the two remaining candidates, it's a difficult topic to talk about without it igniting intraparty warfare, however. These economic and financial issues are clearly US v. THEM, however.

Suffice it to say that I believe in Universal health care, not Universally required health insurance. I believe government should guarantee basic health care to all citizens, and if you desire to have an upgrade, you can buy insurance for that. We need aggressive controls of outrageous costs which are the direct result of Bill Frist's family and their destruction of the hospital system in America.

Poor people can't afford to pay their heating bills and gasoline for their cars, and we're going to make them go into their pockets for health insurance? That's the most UnDemocratic, UnProgressive idea I've heard since the flat tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Long-Little-Doggie Donating Member (895 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
45. K & R
Great stuff! Not that certain R's would let data get in the way of their pre-conceived notions...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
46. Boy, I really needed this information.
I'm sending it to evryone on my list. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #46
61. Glad you can use it. Several posts also have great info.
thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. The whole thread is sterling.
All good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
50. What Republicans do best
is take money out of circulation. All those wealthy investors who reaped the greatest benefits from Bush policies put that money in off shore tax havens. It never gets back into the economy. They are winning the class war because they control the cash. Their short term, instant cash policies will come back to cause social unrest, hence the secret camps being built by Halliburton. Without a consumer class there's no one left to buy what they're selling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
51. TexasObserver> how do you think Hillary will do in Texas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. Please see my posts in GDP on that topic. Don't want to get into that here.
This topic is good for all Democrats to use against all Republicans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
53. A couple points - 1st, Are you aware there is an Economics Forum on DU?
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 12:57 AM by A HERETIC I AM


Here is a link to the Economics Forum. There is also a Personal Finance & Investing Group


Your first question is a bit misleading and not entirely accurate.
Question:
How bad is the economy?

Answer:
Bad. If you will look at the Dow Jones Industrial Average, you will see that since Bush took office, the DJIA has risen (in dollars, not real, inflated dollars) under 9%, or a little over 1% per year. This is pathetic, even if there were no inflation and no diminution in the value of the US dollar.

What this means is that you if you invested $1000 in the DJIA, on average, on January 20, 2001, the day Bush took office, and let it ride for 7 years, you would now have $1090 to show for it in value.

If you had invested your $1000 in something really safe, like tax free bonds, paying maybe 5% per annum, you would have over $1350 in value now, and in fact, given your ability to reinvest the the $50 it was throwing you each year, you'd have closer to $1400. When really safe bonds are outperforming the stock market that badly, the economy is really bad.
While your sentiment is in the right place, your numbers are not accurate. You neglect to mention that the 30 stocks in the Dow all pay dividends and they average 2.9% If you are going to include reinvesting interest on Bonds, you should include reinvesting dividends. You would find the total return of the DOW 30 is considerably higher than 1% per year.



One last question; How the hell does someone put up 2680 posts in 19 days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. Gold, Euros, Bonds, Canadian $, all better than DJIA 30 since 01-20-01
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 02:37 AM by TexasObserver
Thanks. No, not aware of the other forum, and mainly concerned about reaching a broad audience of DUers who don't understand finance or economics.

Yes, the DJIA 30 throw some nominal dividends, but the DJIA is meant as a barometer of the DOW, and as such is meant to represent that market segment. Most of the stocks don't throw dividends of any note.

Even with dividends, bonds throwing 5% per annum would have thrown more revenues than the DOW over the past 7 years. Further, I'm sure you'd agree that in real dollars, the DOW has dropped in value since January 20, 2001.


You will agree, won't you, that if an investor had $100,000 to invest on January 20, 2001, they would have outperformed your 30 DJIA stocks by buying and keeping any of the following:

Euros
Canadian Dollars
Oil
Gold
Platinum
AAA bonds


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 04:09 AM
Response to Original message
56. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
58. About the bubble: Expect market changes prior to an election.
...explains the 2000 internet-bubble's adjustments.

Around March 2000, Bush had already tapped donors and thereby blocked others from those donors. He had a lock and those in the know reacted in March.

By summer the usual strategic changes prior to an election happened.

I recall that the market dropped on the day after Tuesday's announcement that Bush had won. More adjustments.

Nice job. Needed. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #58
62. thanks for your contributions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
60. Thank you - This should be very useful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
65. Let us not forget that the worthless POS that is driving us
over a cliff has a Master of Business Administration degree. Bwahahaha... :rofl:

Not to mention that he's run every business venture he ever had into the ground. What were the Supremes thinking when they hired him??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #65
67. Bush has run into the ground everything he has touched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC