Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Atty Christopher Christie, NJ, to face ‘grilling’ over Ashcroft cronyism

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 04:46 PM
Original message
US Atty Christopher Christie, NJ, to face ‘grilling’ over Ashcroft cronyism
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/02/18/christie-to-face-grilling-over-ashcroft-cronyism/

Christie to face ‘grilling’ over Ashcroft cronyism.

The House Judiciary Committee has “called for New Jersey’s U.S. attorney, Christopher Christie, to testify at a hearing next week about his appointment of former Attorney General John Ashcroft to a lucrative assignment as a corporate monitor.” The committee made the request by “e-mail and phone to the Justice Department’s Office of Legislative Affairs about two weeks ago but has not received a response.” It has also not received a response from Ashcroft to testify.

http://www.americanprogressaction.org/progressreport/2008/01/pr20080114

Chris Christie's Cronyism

In September, New Jersey's U.S. attorney, Christopher Christie, announced that the nation's largest manufacturers of hip and knee implants agreed to pay $311 million to settle allegations that they secretly paid kickbacks to surgeons. At the time, Christie touted the case as "groundbreaking" for consumers. Yet the deal also "proved to be lucrative for Christie's old boss," former attorney general John Ashcroft, whose firm received a $52 million no-bid contract to monitor one of the corporations in the settlement. This apparent favoritism is part of a pattern by Christie, who has directed similar contracts to other former Bush administration colleagues. The Justice Department has now opened up an investigation into U.S. attorneys' "procedures for selecting outside monitors to police settlements with large companies," which have gone largely unmonitored. Congressional leaders in both the House and the Senate have also suggested that they will soon be holding hearings on the subject.

POLITICAL FAVORITISM: Last fall, Christie awarded Ashcroft's firm a private, no-bid 18-month contract worth $28 to $52 million to monitor Zimmer Holdings of Indiana, one of the corporations in the settlement. According to SEC filings, the arrangement calls for Zimmer to directly "pay Ashcroft Group Consulting Services an average monthly fee between $1.5 million and $2.9 million. The figure includes a flat payment of $750,000 to the firm's 'senior leadership group,' individual legal and consulting services billed at up to $895 an hour, and as much as $250,000 a month for expenses including private airfare, lodging and meals." Zimmer has confirmed that "Christie had directed it to hire Mr. Ashcroft," who had tapped Christie to serve on his advisory panel in 2004. Christie has insisted that Ashcroft was the best pick to monitor Zimmer because he "understands organization structure and how to get things done." Yet Ashcroft's group isn't even a law firm. A spokesman for Ashcroft also confirmed that the group never lobbied for the contract, but "was pleased by the referral." While Ashcroft's deal with Christie appears to be the most lucrative, three other former Justice Department colleagues received similar contracts from Christie to monitor medical-supply companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. This must be the most criminal administration
in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No doubt in my mind. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. absolutely
and they get away with it. and get away with it. so frustrating! i gotta go scream
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why on Earth should this have been a "no-bid" thing?
How is something like that decided? Who decides?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's cronyism, pure and simple. You'd think a federal official would
respect federal rules, but we've seen how disrespectful/criminal this admin is. There's only one problem; he got caught, big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. **** $895 an hour, and as much as $250,000 a month for expenses ****
Says it all.
I'll do it for 10% less, and frankly, do an honest job too! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. REC 5 - KICK this up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. BFEE business as usual.
--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC