Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boy, am I glad the editing time-frame hasn't run out.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:32 PM
Original message
Boy, am I glad the editing time-frame hasn't run out.
Edited on Wed Feb-20-08 11:43 PM by Redstone
There were factors I hadn't considered, and I appreciate having those factors pointed out to me.

Thanks for saving me from myself yet again, folks.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another famous guy gets caught fooling around.
:boring:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. But that's not the "news," according to MANY posts here tonight. No, the news is NOT
whether McCain diddled that lobbyist or not, the NEWS is his wife's appearance.

THAT'S what we should be thinking about.

Just EXACTLY like the rightwingers' comments about Chelsea Clinton, even back when she was a 12-year-old girl.

Du has sunk that low.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Thank you, Redstone. There are some vicious people on DU
I'm not a Cindy fan but some of these attacks are just plain mean and nasty and really uncalled for. Flame away, folks!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Hey, you. I had to retract what I originally said, because it seems that Mrs McCain
was the one who jumped ugly first. So I'll reserve my comments until I sort it out.

I'm damn happy to see you still around here; how's your health these days?

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. i have no interest in attacking or praising her, she's a non factor to me right now.
kind of like Laura Bush, you can tell she'd rather be anywhere but there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm not sure it would be happening if she hadn't made that comment about Michelle Obama
Edited on Wed Feb-20-08 11:42 PM by Lone_Star_Dem
She stepped beyond being just an innocent family member of an asshole with that and put herself in the line of fire.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Oh, Christ. I should not have posted what I did, without considering that.
Thank you for the heads-up.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. No problem
We all do it from time to time. Next time you see me forgetting an incident just give me a nudge too. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. When she inserted herself as the "prouder" American...
.... she climbed atop a high horse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. And it's a long fall off those high horses
Many a bruised ass has been blamed on such falls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. almost always with you on this. she was a druggie and didnt get in trouble, she was other woman
and i NEVER respect that. as a party is lecturing me on morality adn christianity.

nope, cant do it this time redstone, which says something about me except.... i can say i am only presently a truth.... to her (their) hypocrisy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. See my edit of my original post. I stand corrected due to my lack of knowing the
"bigger picture" here, and not for the first time.

You'd think that would make me pay better attention in the future, but that's a faint hope.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's a response to the attacks on Michelle Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Yeah, you're not the first to point that out, though I really do appreciate you doing so.
See my edit of my original post. I typed before thinking on this one.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. How is McSame boffing a Lobbyiest "attacking his wife"?
Should we act like this is 1950 and gentlemen of substance are allowed to have their peccadillos while the press just winks and nods?

McSame is a public figure running for president. He claims to be Mr. Integrity. He was, until his staff intervened, having an inappropriate relationship with a woman who had business with his legislative agencies. That is an issue that should be brought out into the light, and is certainly of far more substance than, for example, the correct parsing of an off-the-cuff comment by Michelle Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. That's not what I was talking about, and you know it. But that won't stop you,
will it?

Yes, I GET that you don't like me.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I actually don't know you and it seems you were talking about
something else. Sorry - my mistake. Hint: try putting enough context in your op so it is clear what you are talking about. I'm sure it was clear to you, it wasn't at all clear to me, and it seems I was not alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
18. Hey, they were trying to lay it on Michelle, Obama responded quickly.
As long as Obama gets to set the terms of the fight, he's going to win. I think I read earlier that he uses framing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
19. I just don't understand it DUers, McCain's biggest fault is his Keating 5 membership
as vividly disclosed in the book Inside Job: The Looting of America's Savings and Loans by Mary Fricker, Stephen Pizzo and Paul Muolo.

McCain bent over backwards to enable these THEIVES. MeCain bent over backward to enable the current batch of thieves in office right now, whose privatizing and outsourcing in the DoD have created an ongoing disaster--even while the idiot sounds off on '100 years' in Iraq !

What is it ? Can't people READ anymore ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC