Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nobel Peace Laureate Says US Trying to Stall Cluster Bomb Agreement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 04:33 PM
Original message
Nobel Peace Laureate Says US Trying to Stall Cluster Bomb Agreement
I find this so disgusting and embarrassing. I don't want these people 'representing' me!


Nobel Peace Laureate Says US Trying to Stall Cluster Bomb Agreement


Wellington, New Zealand - Nobel Peace Prize winner Jody Williams accused the United States on Wednesday of trying to stall negotiations on an international agreement to ban cluster bombs - without even attending talks on the treaty.

Delegates from more than 120 countries are negotiating a convention in New Zealand that would ban the use, production, trade and storage of cluster bombs that cause unacceptable harm to civilians.

The talks, first launched by Austria, Ireland, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Peru and the Vatican last year, aim to define which cluster bomb weapons are acceptable and which should be banned.

Williams, a delegate to the talks, said the U.S. was seeking exemptions from the treaty for many cluster weapons, a 10-year delay to any treaty coming into force, and the right for non-cluster munition states to work in coalition with cluster bomb users.

The United States was not represented at the negotiations, and Williams accused its allies of making the demands on its behalf. “The U.S. has put pressure on states to do these things,” she told The Associated Press.

There was no immediate response to a request for comment from U.S. Embassy officials in Wellington.

more...

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/02/21/7199/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. There goes the trade deficit!
You think it's bad now, wait until one of the main U.S. exports is banned!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 05:00 PM
Original message
Who in his right mind would ever be in favour of these, or landmines either? n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. ...
http://www.commondreams.org/views07/0309-23.htm

snip//

For example, she opposes the international treaty to ban land mines. She voted against the Feinstein-Leahy amendment last September restricting U.S. exports of cluster bombs to countries that use them against civilian-populated areas. She opposes restrictions on U.S. arms transfers and police training to governments that engage in gross and systematic human rights abuses, such as Egypt, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Israel, Pakistan, Cameroon and Chad, to name only a few. She insists upon continuing unconditional funding for the Iraq war and has called for dramatic increases in Bush’s already bloated military budget. She has challenged the credibility of Amnesty International and other human rights groups that criticize policies of the United States and its allies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, that's not good. I mean it might be good for getting votes from on-the-fence Republicans,...
...but it's just not, well, good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hillary for one
and the rest of the neofreaks. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryCeleste Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Because they work against certain targets better than anything else
The other option is carpet bombing and Dresden
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Civilians, you mean? n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryCeleste Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. No
I mean soft (as in not armoured) distributed sites like SAMs, artillery and missile launchers. For those, cluster munitions are the best answer, from a military sense. The alternative is lots of regular bombs with the attendant collateral damager above and below ground. Fuses for those can fail too, which makes for a much more dangerous situation. There is no easy answer to this one.

Cluster munitions used to attack or control civilians is against the Geneva Accords and is a war crime. Israel's use of them in Lebanon was quite questionable at times and there is evidence of inappropriate use. That has to be prosecuted, but it looks like that is not going to happen. US has cut way back on its stockpiles of them, which is a good thing and purportedly there are new rules in terms of documenting their use.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. (Raises hand) Me!
As an artilleryman, part of the fire direction equation is choosing the right munition to attack the right target. The JMEMS holds that it takes approximately 50 rounds of 155mm HE to destroy a single tank while only 6 DPICM rounds will do the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryCeleste Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I brought that up earlier
without a response. Clusters are the *right* round for certain situations, mostly soft targets in open terrain, like SAMs or missile batteries. Similar quantites for JSOW vs JDAM for air launched weapons.

The high failure rate can/has been addressed. Israeli submuntions have a much lower failure rate. Not sure if the US has duplicated that or not in new munitions. We have lots of the older ones left, with the higher failure rate submunitions still in inventory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cluster bomb commitment sought
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23256944-12377,00.html

MORE than 100 countries including Australia will today be asked to formally declare their commitment to banning cluster bombs, in a step towards a treaty banning the weapons.

The 122-nation meeting in Wellington will ask delegations to sign the document, expected to call for a binding legal solution to the problem of cluster munitions.

A draft of the so-called Wellington Declaration says signatories agree that cluster munitions cause unacceptable harm to civilians and their use, production and transfer must be prohibited.

(snip)
On Wednesday, a former Nobel Peace Prize winner, anti-landmine activist Jody Williams, attacked Australia as one of a group of nations at the meeting trying to undermine the proposed treaty.

The Australian delegation has argued that elements of a proposed treaty could make it difficult for the country's military to work cooperatively with nations like the USA, which are unlikely to sign up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, of course, The U.S. develops, utilizes and sells the damn things!!!
There's a helluva' lot of profit and death in cluster munitions!!
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. A blatant end run around the landmine ban.
Look at the failure rate for US cluster munitions (approx 25% IIRC) and compare that to what is achievable (approx 1%).

There can be little doubt that the higher failure rate is deliberate. Particularly given their sensitivity to movement AFTER they have smacked into the ground with considerably greater force.

They are an area denial weapon in addition to their stated purpose. Consider which Israel used in Lebanon: It's own low failure munition, or the high failure US one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaryCeleste Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Not really
There can be little doubt that the higher failure rate is deliberate. Particularly given their sensitivity to movement AFTER they have smacked into the ground with considerably greater force.


Its a cost issue. Higher reliability ones would be more expensive when most of them were made.

They are an area denial weapon in addition to their stated purpose. Consider which Israel used in Lebanon: It's own low failure munition, or the high failure US one?

Reportedly some of both. The stockpiles used were only replaced with IMI made ones, with the much lower failure rate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. we are the shame of the world....follow the money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. they hate us for our freedom...
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 12:03 PM by QuestionAll
to make and use cluster bombs as our corrupt and soulless leaders see fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC