Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain "affair" doesn't smell right

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:26 AM
Original message
McCain "affair" doesn't smell right
just slap the :tinfoilhat: on me, but this doesn't smell like an attack from the "librul" left to smear mccain

I know there's more to this than a typical roll in the hay scandal. However, it feels toooo "rovian" of a setup for it to have originated from the "librul" left

anyone else have the same sneaky feeling?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. If it was an attack from "The Left" it would have come after the GOP National Convention.
Since it came before the McCain nomination was a done-deal, I smell Karl Rove's fecal fingerprints all over it.

It's not to late for ClusterHuck '08.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. Hucky was pretty clever in his statement yesterday I thought..
he dug the hole pretty deep for McCain. Called him out on "giving his word", when it was obviously a lie. I was pretty impressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
36. Or Mittens ...
Please Please Please, let Mittens get back in the race.
The ultimate Phlip Phlop.

"I am dedicated to becoming the president, right after I gave up, right after I was dedicated to becoming the president"

It even rolls of the tongue.

Cheers
Drifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. actually i've seen a couple people speculate that it was to
knock McCain out so as to clear the way for a Romney Resurgence.

I don't agree - the timing is off; why release now, rather than earlier when Romney was still in the run?

Rather I think it's more likely that the official explanation is true; NY Times was working on this story, but wasn't sure they had enough (and the story in question is pretty meatless), but were pushed into publishing it by a story being worked on at the New Republic on the New York Times.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Haven't you heard? It's a non-story now!
Morning Joe claimed such this morning! Move along. Nothing to see here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. But Andrea Mitchell didn't go along with him! She said we haven't heard
"the other shoe" fall yet. She's smart and she's been around the block. I think she knows the game is up, or will be up, and she doesn't want to be caught laughing it off...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. ew....missed that! thanks. The plot thickens! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Don't think it will be for Romney but someone else.
Anything can happen between now and the GOP convention. I believe there is another candidate who will be drafted for the top of the ticket. Romney or someone else could be the bottom of the tickect but the GOP needs to offer a much better candidate that what they have offered so far if they hope to beat either Hillary or Obama. And if Gore or Edwards is drafted at the convention, the GOP can just hang it up. This is by far the most unpredictable primary for either side in my lifetime and I am 66.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's not an attack from either side. Sometimes things are what they are.
The RW Noise Machine hasn't a clue how to deal with this because it didn't come from the left.

All they can do is try to discredit the NYT and rally around the guy they were damning a few weeks ago.

Rove, et al isn't in on this. McCain's been a snake for 25 years--rumors of his affairs are common in AZ. He just finally got cought taking the money from a pretty girl who resembles his wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. No, I feel it as well.
They were really quick to blame the "Librul Media" as well.

Liberal Media my ass...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. hadn't thought of it, but I could see it being a poison pill like the Bush air guard papers
and in that case, even though the papers were questioned, their content was ignored--because it was substantially correct.

In this case, if the affair turns out to be a red herring, they might try to use this incident to deflect ANY discussion of McCain's cozy relationships with lobbyists as Rachel Maddow on Air America has pointed out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
25. That is correct. They learned from the Rather incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
28. Yes
seems to be a fairly weak scandal to me. If McCain can brush this one off it will be an inoculation against future ethics scandals.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. it depends on whether MSM gets memo to start calling it ''old news,'' etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. I don't think the NYT was as careless as CBS..
the claimed that they had nailed down their sources, plus they've got that guy Weaver on the record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. I smell Rove's "THEY'RE playing dirty politics" stench...
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0418-26.htm

The best way to rally they troops is a fake attack....

Say...how did we get into Iraq and Afghanistan again? :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. No. Rove is not behind every bush and rock. I think McCain has
some enemies, within his own camp, that want to tarnish the straight-talking, ethical image he has cultivated with the press. They know he's a fraud, that he's as crooked as the rest--and now they're telling the world. The fact that it rallies the GOP to defend him--well, they don't have anyone to replace him that might win in November, so of course they will, for now. But this story will fester, and even though everyone is slamming the NYT now, they've certainly raised enough doubt about his character. I'm all kinds of happy about it. McCain won't be able to go after Obama now with quite the same self-righteousness that he's been displaying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. Certain power player repubs on K Street for instance..
they haven't forgiven and forgotten, I think this is coming from them. I think they dribbled out just enough for him to dig his hole and then the other shoe will drop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. No, it's surely a set up...
An old Republican politician caught having an affair with a woman over 25, instead of a minor? Impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
37. Yeah ... I think they are ...
happy to have a sexual scandal that involves woman !

Cheers
Drifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. the RW talkers are all pissed because if the NYT had put this story out months ago...
they think they wouldn't be stuck with Grandpa...truly a clusterf*** for them...the NYT COULD HAVE DONE THEM A FAVOR...go figure that all they can do is rail on the Times...

TooF***in'Bad...they say there is no meat in the story, but you know they would have found plenty of meat in it 3 months ago...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. There was ome illustrative part of the story - How McCain can be bought
by lobbyists. That needs to be played up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. hopefully, that is the future of this story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. That's the money part of the article and I wish more would read it.
He's so convinced of his moral purity he doesn't see that he's being influenced and this he's easy to buy.

If nothing else in the article, I wish DU would read the last two pages. That part nailed him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
13. IMO, the NYT maybe sitting on a more damaging story, and this is to
discredit the NYT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
14. I have always thought it stunk. Smells like the republican smear machine
to me too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
15. Yes, see this thread from the night the story broke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
19. Repukes like to pass the blame around but Gary Hart would like
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 11:08 AM by Feeney2
to differ with that opinion of it being the big,bad lib'rl media. It was the NYT that wasquestioning himabout his "affairs" when he pontificated to "follow him around". The Miami Herald was already working their own :affai" story and took his offer up and found Donna Rice, Gary Hart, and the boat Monkey Business. the rest his history. Newspapers cover stories and if repukes dislike the messenger tough break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
20. no way imo was this from democrats, if dems had this kind of info i would hope
they'd wait until October to use it.

Sounds shitty right, sorry, no more taking the high road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
21. Could it be, "Here comes Jeb to save the day...."
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 11:12 AM by Frustratedlady
Think of their dilemma. They have all that information in the WH/Deep Hole they won't release to the petitioners (Leahy, Conyers, etc.), so what's the first thing the Dems are going to do if they get in the door? You've got it.

There aren't enough shredders to clean up that mess. They MUST have a Pug sitting in the WH and what better Pug than Jeb? Let's keep it in the family...don't show your dirty laundry in public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Hah!
I'm going to say the great minds thing here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
22. Good God, Don't Tell Me
They're thinking of knocking out their only 'viable' candidate so that at the last minute Jeb can come in to save the day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
24. It sure did get the responses they needed. Mass rage against the Times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
26. when this thread appears right after the one about mcain playing "stinkfinger"...
it adds a whole new level to it...:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
27. There is No Mainstream "Left" Media....
the media is corporate :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
29. sorry if all I have are questions
if more comes out beyond the 'affair'.. and it alleges mccain is a pocket politican and this explodes into a full blown OMG scandal

If it does before the GOP convention - what will it mean for the GOP nomination? huckabee by default? or sneak in romney?

what about after? will mccain be spending all his loot defending himself? step aside as the nominee?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
35. Well, McCain just got caught in a lie by Newsweek
Newsweek is reporting that McCain testified in a deposition five years ago that he personally spoke with the CEO of Paxson Communications regarding Paxson's business before the FCC. This flatly contradicts McCain's denial yesterday that he'd had any contact with Paxson or his representatives regarding the matter.


From another DU thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2908268
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
38. I Think It Came From huckabee
So does my mom, and she's one smart lady.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
39. the religious right and the fiscal conservatives are at odds
Each side is trying to scupper the other side's candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC