Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UN Voting on Nuclear Disarmament Shows Abysmal US Record

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:48 AM
Original message
UN Voting on Nuclear Disarmament Shows Abysmal US Record
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 10:48 AM by marmar
from the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation:



UN Voting on Nuclear Disarmament Shows Abysmal US Record
By David Krieger

Each year the United Nations considers resolutions that seek to limit, control or eliminate the dangers that nuclear weapons pose to the inhabitants of the planet. In general, these resolutions can be described as nuclear disarmament measures.*

In 2007, in the 62nd General Assembly of the United Nations, 20 resolutions on nuclear disarmament were considered. Of these, five were not voted upon. Of the 15 resolutions that were voted upon by the UN General Assembly in 2007, only one country in the world, the United States, had a record of opposing all of them. It is an abysmal voting record, and the people of the United States should be aware of the dangerous and obstructionist role their government is playing in opposing a serious agenda for nuclear disarmament.

The votes of the nine nuclear weapon states are listed in the chart below. Countries were given one point for each Yes vote, zero points for each abstention, and a point was taken away for each No vote:

China Pakistan N. Korea India Russia UK Israel France US
Yes (+1) 11 10 11 8 5 3 1 2 0
No (-1) 0 0 2 3 1 9 8 10 15
Abstain (0) 4 5 0 4 8 3 6 3 0
Vote Tally 11 10 9 5 4 -6 -7 -8 -15



United States

In three of the votes, the United States was the only country in the world to vote against the resolutions. The resolutions called for:

1. Giving security assurances to non-nuclear weapons states that nuclear weapons would not be used against them;
2. Supporting the Treaty on the South-East Asia Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone;
3. Supporting the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, to permanently end all nuclear weapons testing.

Four other resolutions had only three votes against, and in each case the US was one of the three. These resolutions called for:

1. Supporting a nuclear-weapon-free southern hemisphere (US, France, UK opposed);
2. Decreasing the operational readiness of nuclear weapons systems (US, France, UK opposed);
3. A UN conference on eliminating nuclear dangers (US, France, UK opposed);
4. Supporting renewed determination toward the elimination of nuclear weapons (US, India, North Korea opposed).

France & United Kingdom

The other nuclear weapons states had more positive voting records, although in the case of the UK and France, only slightly more so. Both France and the UK voted Yes on a resolution highlighting the risk of nuclear proliferation in the Middle East and on supporting for the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. The UK’s other Yes vote was on renewed determination towards elimination of nuclear weapons. ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/2008/02/13_krieger_abysmal_record.php?krieger




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Coz when we support nukes, we're really supporting peace!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC