Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain - #894 of 899 at the Naval Academy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:13 PM
Original message
McCain - #894 of 899 at the Naval Academy
I just cannot get enough of that statistic. And people are afraid of him besting a Constitutional lawyer? He couldn't even beat George Bush, a "C" student, in debates.

894 of 899
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hey, I thought Gore or Kerry would both beat W.
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 10:21 PM by ih8thegop
Well, you could say they both did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Patton was dead last in his class at West Point
Book smarts aren't street smarts. McCain will be a tough opponent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not a great example. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Not a persuasive argument n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Then use Custer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
30. George Custer
was the youngest Brigadier General in the United States Army. His Civil War record as a cavalry commander was one of the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolfgangmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
29. Patton is an excellent analogy
McInsane is just like old blood and guts.



Both nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omega3 Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. most ppl don't really pay that much attention to the debates, many ppl here do b/c we're poli junkie
s, but most don't sit there and weigh the preformances of the candidates and change how they'll vote. I just don't think most voters are that "heady" like most of us. If that were the case, John Edwards would have seen a bigger jump in the polling after the debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msedano Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. You know what they call the guy who finished last in the class?
Sir.

You might want to look at why the guy got his ass shot out of the sky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Will Amurka want to have a beer with this flunkie, too?
Lord, help us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. AND he got shot down, plus set fire to the Forrestal, like Poppy BUSH n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDaddy44 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Thats over the line
I think McCain is dangerous, but he did not set fire to the Forrestal. Over 100 guys died, but he had absolutely nothing to do with it. He just happened to be sitting in his plane.

Please, this is not an appropriate comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. thus McCain began his tremendous rise to world-famous mediocrity...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. I have to go with summa cum laude graduates instead, especially when the University
has noteworthy academic rank.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudbase Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. I wouldn't hold his class rank against him.
It's quite an exercise to just get in to one of the academies. Once in, there are regimental demands and responsibilities on top of rather rigorous academic burdens. Just graduating is an accomplishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. The entering class at Annapolis was probably 1500 midshipmen in those days.
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 10:58 PM by TahitiNut
The washout rate was that high ... and Annapolis attracted some good folks. (Ask ProudDad.) Class of '58 was during the heydey of service academy popularity. While many midshipmen were athletic scholarships and many were appointed by Senators and Congressmen with little attention to aptitude, many/most appointments were based on academic performance and competitive examinations. Clearly, he's no brain surgeon but Annapolis really didn't graduate people as rock hard stupid and lazy like Smirk. (Smirk wouldn't have lasted a month - even if he got in by some miracle.) So ... I pretty much reject the comparison. I know about the Yalies of Smirk's day ... a LOT of assholes and party boys. McCain's problems at the academy were rebelliousness and conduct ... not likely to curry the fond regard of instructors. I don't regard McCain's weakness as innate intelligence ... but more like arrogance and pugnaciousness. It's also probably why he's a Republican (besides family tradition) ... arrogance. I'm pretty sure he's a Social Darwinist ... a "let the weak die" fellow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. His father was an admiral.
Maybe McCain was an exceptional candidate, but then again, maybe he wasn't. Nobody wants to reject an admiral's kid. Just sayin'... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
704wipes Donating Member (966 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. McCain - Navy Pilot - more takeoffs than landings
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 11:06 PM by 704wipes
in multi-million dollar planes... He should have been flying the obsolete shit with Georgie Boy down in Alabama...of course when your daddy is an admiral, they roll another one out on the flight deck and get the hell outta your way !!

Maybe we should call him John McCrash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I heard he crashed five planes..
McCain lost FIVE US AircraftsMcCain's second crash occurred while he was deployed in the Mediterranean. ... There were infantry guys -- grunts on the ground -- who had more than 7000 ...
www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/cin_mccain_lost_five_u.htm - 17k - Cached - Similar pages
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. From your own link, he really only crashed 3
.
.
.

First off, I am not a McCain supporter, nor any Republican for that matter.

But fair is fair.

From your link:

"McCain's fourth aircraft loss occurred July 29, 1967, soon after he was assigned to the USS Forrestal as an A-4 Skyhawk pilot. While seated in the cockpit of his aircraft waiting his turn for takeoff, an accidently fired rocket slammed into McCain's plane. He escaped from the burning aircraft, but the explosions that followed killed 134 sailors, destroyed at least 20 aircraft, and threatened to sink the ship.

McCain's fifth loss happened during his 23rd mission over North Vietnam on Oct. 26, 1967, when McCain's A-4 Skyhawk was shot down by a surface-to-air missile
______________________________________________________________________

Looks like his 4th "crash", which was while he was sitting in his plane, was the fault of another US pilot - hmm - was GeeDubya there?

oh no that's right

GW never actually "served"

And McCain's 5th "crash"

was being stupid enough to sit still in front of a SAM?

Republicans are bad enough, there is no need to exaggerate their faults.

But something to consider -

McCain is a survivor, he ain't no pussycat.

Never underestimate your adversary.

BAD mistake . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. good post
"Never underestimate your adversary." Says it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Please don't post from websites like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. I got mixed feelings on that, we DO need to know what the others are thinking.
.
.
.

And that website, slanted, granted

Did give the facts?

We have to be able to sift out the facts from the opinion.

I have NOBODY on ignore here,

I wanna know what the "bad apples" wanna say.

I do have enough self-discipline not to get involved in flame wars.

Suggestion though,

If you want to advise someone not to post from a certain source

Give an explanation?

Websites "like that" leaves me with the question

"Like what?"

I don't want a response - PM the person with your advice maybe?

Or me.

Some of the posts would be better in PMs than in the forum

I don't respond to flames or unwarranted attacks.

It's non productive IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. When I say "websites like that" I mean really wild and crazy attacks on the candidates.
For example, if someone started a website "barackobamaworshipssatan.com" and it posted all kinds of garbage, I would be angry if someone posted from there. We don't need to delve into the gutter to beat McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. Look at his Navy record, too. The best he can do is aspire to mediocrity
He did some commendable shit at the Hanoi Hilton ..... but that's it. The rest of his career was shit. His father was CINCPAC and his grandfather was an admiral ......... and he couldn't get a star - even after all the medals he got in Viet Nam. As a senator (a career bought and paid for by a wealthy trust fund wife who is a lifelong political operative, recovering drug addict, and unindicted felon) he'd been a sham. A mainline corrupt politician posing as a maverick and as one who is ethically superior.

He's actually just dog shit with feet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. I thought we'd beat Raygun too.
We can't get cocky, even if the repuke nominee is the über douchebag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I'll never know why people think Reagan was a dummy.
He wasn't. He acted silly and stupid, but he knew that was endearing to more people than it turned off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
25. I have to disagree with the premise of this thread. Here are some stats for you.
For each of the military academies, West Point, Air Force Academy and the Naval Academy, out of about 13,000 applicants yearly, each academy accepts about 3000 'plebes' or first years.

Out of those 3000, fewer than 1000 make it through the academy.

It is an *extremely* challenging environment, and even the last cadet in his class should be proud of the accomplishment. They must go through some of the strictest soldier training and then officer training. They are the cream of the crop.

Even some of the drop-outs do well in life. Edgar Allen Poe was a West Point drop out.

Here are some notable non-graduating drop-outs of West Point: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notable_non-graduate_alumni_of_West_Point

Do not attack McCain on this issue.

I know what an accomplishment it is to graduate from there. I'm a West Point drop out myself.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruiner4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. thank you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. best post of the thread n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC