Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scientists' row over G spot nears a climax

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:02 AM
Original message
Scientists' row over G spot nears a climax
http://rawstory.com/news/afp/Scientists_row_over_G_spot_nears_a__02202008.html


After more than half a century of debate and bedroom exploration, a row about the location of the fabled G spot may be settled at last, the British weekly New Scientist says. The G spot, named after a German gynaecologist called Ernst Graefenberg who first mooted its existence in 1950, is said to be a highly sensitive area in the vagina that, when stimulated, gives a woman a powerful orgasm. But where the G spot is located has been clouded by evidence that is subjective or downright contradictory, and some experts have even concluded that it does not exist.

The answer, according to Italian researcher Emmanuele Jannini, is that, yes, the G spot does exist, but only among those women who are lucky enough to possess it, New Scientist reports. Jannini, of the University of L'Aquila, used ultrasound to scan a key vaginal area among nine women who claimed to experience vaginal orgasms and 11 who said they didn't. The target was an area of tissue on the front vaginal wall located behind the urethra. Tissue was notably thicker in this space among the first group of women compared with the second, the scans revealed.

Jannini, who reports the research in full in the Journal of Sexual Medicine, says the evidence is clear: "Women without any visible evidence of a G spot cannot have a vaginal orgasm...For the first time, it is possible to determine by a simple, rapid and inexpensive method if a woman has a G spot or not," he believes.

Some experts question whether what Jannini calls the G spot is a distinct structure or the internal part of the clitoris, whose size is highly variable. Others say more work is needed to confirm Jannini's belief that the G spot is missing in women who don't experience vaginal orgasm. The G spot could be there in all women, but with differing degrees of sensitivity, they believe.
Women who do not have a G spot should not despair, according to the New Scientist report.

"They can still have a normal orgasm through stimulation of the clitoris," said Jannini.



POSTED FOR THE INCREDIBLE HEADLINE, TO CAP OFF AN UNBEARABLE WEEK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, good headline. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Oh, ferchrissakes
We needed a herd of researchers just to tell us this??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Again, this thread is nothing without
pictures. (A map and a flashlight would be nice, too.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. TahitiNut, I'm laughing!
>(A map and a flashlight would be nice, too.)<

:rofl:
Julie

p.s. You know, don't you, that the fastest way to any woman's heart is to make her laugh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Well ... a fella's gotta have the right equipment when goin' for the gold. Like ...
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 01:22 AM by TahitiNut


:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
46. Mining for "G-Spots"?
Dude with that helmet you could find the "Lost Ark"...

Come to think of it I knew a girl once who could have hidden.... oh nevermind!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. it is possible to determine by a simple, rapid and inexpensive method if a woman has a G spot or not
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 12:11 AM by BlackVelvet04
that can be determined by ways that are a helluva lot more fun and cheaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
31. no.. no.. no.. simple and inexpensive yes, but...
if it's rapid.. you're never going to find it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. speak for yourself.......n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. I guess you're one of the lucky ones
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 11:06 AM by notadmblnd
IMO, If it's only going to last a couple of minutes.. why bother?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. I never said it only lasted a few minutes....
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 11:39 AM by BlackVelvet04
it only takes a few minutes to find the target. :-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. I know, you said rapid
I took that to mean, do it quickly (the entire process). I was also thinking you were a male. Sorry if I misunderstood your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. No problem.
I'm a female type person.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GDavis Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. Simple test at home: Use your finger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellaydubya Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. Be still my heart....
I feel a new medical procedure on the horizon- everyone can have a G Spot- Yes!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. Got me to read it. Very clever. n/t
:kick:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. so if we don't have it can we get one installed?
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
33. Yes...but it voids the warranty.
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. I don't know. I'm trying to picture how one fits in rows of scientists.
Maybe scientists IN a row -- as in taking turns. Then one could tally how they measure up in terms of facilitating the female orgasm. Scientifically.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
10. Men who want to know what turns women on ask women.
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 12:20 AM by snot
Despite Freud, Masters and Johnson and all other male-dominated research, I by age 9, more than 40 years ago, had figured out that I couldn't have an orgasm without any clitoral stimulation at all, and that it was nonetheless better with G-spot stimulation as well.

My dad, consistently with Freud, Master & Johnson et al., was meanwhile insisting both that mature women shouldn't need clitoral stimulation AND that there were no significant nerves in the vagina (don't ask why he felt it appropriate to be telling me this).

Go figure how you're supposed to have an orgasm based solely on stimulation of a vagina with no nerves.

Men who want to know what turns women on ask them.

I hate to say it but I really think we'd get this resolved more quickly if we stuck with female researchers on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
45. There's already been such research. It found that the clitoris was not just
the visible part, but that its nerves spread much farther into the vagina than previously thought, hence the "vaginal" orgasm. I don't remember the researchers names, but I think they were female, and this came out about a year ago. I cheered when I saw it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. ...
:woohoo: :party: :woohoo: :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. Well, I'm having a cigarette now.
Was it good for you too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. WHAT????????


A SMOKER!!!!!!!!!!!


Stone him!!!!!!!!!!!

:rofl: :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
13. Why does it take women longer to climax than men?
Yeah, yeah, who cares?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
14. Next they can determine if
female ejaculation is attainable or not...

I'm tired of trying for years and being disappointed. :-(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Don't stop trying! Trust me, it's worth it....
You gotta find the right man, that's all.
If you don't, it IS possible to achieve alone...
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libnnc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I'll pass on the man part...er..edit
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 12:42 AM by libnnc
at least a real live man part (that you have to pick up after the next AM)...;-)

silicone and latex rawks :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RuleOfNah Donating Member (603 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. I have to find the right woman.
Empirically, the G.
Beyond that, interrupted by the fear of (rhyme).

Is that the ridge of your gums or are you just glad to lose track of everything in the universe for an hour? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
15. They needed scientists for this?
They could have just asked some lesbians. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
16. Well, thank the Goddess that scientists have finally chimed in to
confirm and deny that the G-spot exists and doesn't in all/some/many/most/few women and to insure that we, women will know that we have or don't have one rather than finding out from our SOs if they've found or not found what we have or we don't.

Woo Hoo!

Rock On!

:bounce: :bounce: :toast: :toast: :headbang: :headbang: :woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo: :applause:


:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
20. Out, Damn G-Spot!
For any male who wants to find the G-spot, here's a simple way to do so... insert your (lubricated in some way) pointer finger into your female partner's vagina and crook that finger like you are calling someone to come to you. that's where the g-spot is. I don't understand how some females could have one and others don't, but I know it definitely exists.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
21. is this a known unknown?
Or an unknown known?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
23. Ah, I see...
...they've finally put their finger on it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
25. oh g! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
27. All These Wisecracks, and Only One Rec?
I'm miffed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
28. What the heck, I'll K&R it
and simply say, I hope the scientists eventually come to an earthshattering conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CGowen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
29. In his next search he can write about U and A spots.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
30. I thought that was settled awhile ago.
An anatomy prof at a med school proved that the clitoris is much bigger and more extensive internally than originally thought. I guess it makes sense, though, that the size varies. That would explain a lot about how women experience orgasm differently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
34. well if they can't come to a conclusion just fake one.
*pshaw*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
35. I hope those volunteers had a good time!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
39. If I get the thrust of this
it's not the size of the wand, it's the receptivity of the magician's audience?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
41. I'm Sorry For Posting This
Thought there would be much more interest. Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Too bad, I love the title.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. You've had about a 1000 hits on this post
...so I'd say there was some interest...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #41
51. It's a deep subject. Apparently, not many DUers can rise to the task. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. Scarlet Woman Indeed!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. ...
O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
42. Inexpensive? Shit, i'll do it for free. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
47. Go on.... yes...
Yes

What? I'm on DU?

Oh hell.

Hey yall :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. I Thought the Punning Would Get You, Salmon!
Haven't seen you around much lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Hiya Demeter!!
How's you? :hug:

I been on I think :rofl:

I sure hope nobody else types this poorly ;)

I'm a fish, it's the perfect lure...

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crweber Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
50. Interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
route66left Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
53. The Location
I tried many times before and after marriage, with all the women I knew and had relations with, to find the location of the fabled G spot. In most, if not all cases I received the same response to my probes for the truth: "Please get your nose out of my business."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC