Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McConnell/Mukasey - ADMIT - Eavesdropping outside of FISA is "illegal"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:19 PM
Original message
McConnell/Mukasey - ADMIT - Eavesdropping outside of FISA is "illegal"
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 03:20 PM by kpete
Saturday February 23, 2008 08:46 EST
McConnell/Mukasey: Eavesdropping outside of FISA is "illegal"

........................

McConnell acknowledged last week that the White House's refusal to extend the wiretapping law was meant to pressure Congress to pass the Senate bill.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hJKgeE0Z-SivATjok-utYBdh9wDwD8UVLBJO2


..................

In the letter from Chairman Reyes http://atrios.blogspot.com/2008_02_10_archive.html#6229571246195545757 to which McConnell and Mukasey are responding, Reyes pointed out that under the still-existing FISA law, the Government is free to commence surveillance without a warrant where there is no time to obtain one. In response, McConnell and Mukasey wrote:

You imply that the emergency authorization process under FISA is an adequate substitute for the legislative authorities that have elapsed. This assertion reflects a basic misunderstanding about FISA's emergency authorization provisions. Specifically, you assert that the National Security Agency (NSA) or Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) "may begin surveillance immediately" in an emergency situation. FISA requires far more, and it would be illegal to proceed as you suggest.


Wow, what a blockbuster revelation. Apparently, as it turns out, in the United States it's "illegal" for the Government to eavesdrop on Americans without first complying with the requirements of FISA. Who would have known? It's a good thing we don't have a Government that would ever do that, or a Congress that would ever tolerate such "illegal" behavior. And it's so moving to hear the Bush administration earnestly explain that they are so hamstrung by FISA's requirements that we are all deeply vulnerable to the Terrorists, but they have no choice but to comply with its burdensome provisions -- because to do otherwise would be "illegal."

...............

So, you see, the Bush administration is in a really tough bind here, because they would really like to eavesdrop outside of FISA because they want to protect us all and keep us safe, but they just can't do that, because eavesdropping without complying with FISA's requirements is "illegal," and that's something they would never, ever do.



http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/02/23/mcconell/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. I never know
what you guys will respond to - thought this one was important

???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I never know either!
Edited on Sat Feb-23-08 08:00 PM by Hissyspit
It might be maybe that we all knew that all that stuff was true already - including that they are hypocrites and shills - and don't need dickwads McConnell and Mukasey telling us what we already know (including that they are hypocrites and shills, and dickwads).

Off to the Greatest Page!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It is important... What I want to see is a corpomedia link to a
story calling them out about it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. "it would be illegal to proceed "
It should be illegal, those ratf*ckers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. If it's illegal now,
it was illegal when they did it. Impeachment should be back on the table, Nancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Busholini & NSA have violated the FISA Law at least
on 30 occasions. Will Busholini be held accountable for those Felonies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC