DU this L.A. Times poll on Presidential choice

[DesertRat]

If the election were today, who would you vote for?
http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/?vote35412964=1 (middle of the page)

Results so far:
16.2%
Hillary Rodham Clinton
0.4%
Mike Gravel
1.6%
Mike Huckabee
7.0%
John McCain
52.6%
Barack Obama
22.3%
Ron Paul
8537 total responses

[lligrd]

1. Done, But Those Results Are Pathetic

What the hell happened to my state?

[Oeditpus Rex]

4. The internets know no borders

Nor do Freepers.



Well, wait — they're hyper-aware of one.

[SoCalDemGrrl]

2. WTF?? John McCain at 52% in Los Angeles.. Doesnt make any sense...

[kayob1]

3. Read it from the bottom up. :) n/t

[Tarheel_Dem]

5. I think you misread it..that's Obama's number(eom)

[lligrd]

6. Nope, It Is McCain At 52%

Look at the link.

[kayob1]

8. You have to read it from the bottom up.

I thought it was McCain first, too, but if you look at it from the bottom up, it's Obama who has the 52%. It's a little confusing the way it's laid out.

[lligrd]

9. If You Look At The Actual Poll It Is Clearly McCain at 52%

I wish it were otherwise.

[Tarheel_Dem]

10. you either have some reading comprehension disabilities, or

you're just flat out lying. You have been told time and again that you must read the poll from the bottom up. What's so hard about that? Perhaps this will help?


Results so far:
-----------------------------------------------------------
16.2%
Hillary Rodham Clinton
-----------------------------------------------------------
0.4%
Mike Gravel
-----------------------------------------------------------
1.6%
Mike Huckabee
-----------------------------------------------------------
7.0%
John McCain
-----------------------------------------------------------
52.6%
Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
22.3%
Ron Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------
8537 total responses

[lligrd]

12. Yikes, I Have No Idea

I swear I checked it twice before answering. Third time was the charm. Give me a break, I have no reason to want McCain to be leading.

[Tarheel_Dem]

18. It's all good...

didn't mean to sound harsh, but I thought you were being deliberately obtuse. My apologies.

[lligrd]

20. No Problem, One Time I Was Glad To Be Wrong

Thanks for setting me straight.

[lligrd]

21. I've Always Had Very Good Reading Comprehensive Test

scores but there was one time in High School (I think it was a Helen Woods Speed Reading Test or something) that I got nearly every answer wrong and they inundated my parents with pleas to join their program and get me help. Can't help wondering now if they didn't put the answer bubbles above the questions. LOL

[Richard D]

11. It is otherwise.

I Thought the same thing, but the results are above the name, not below it. Start with Paul at 22 percent on the bottom and work on up.

[lligrd]

13. Thanks, I Finally Got It nt

[Richard D]

14. No problem

It's so confusing I can't help but wonder if it's not unintentional.

[lligrd]

15. Really, Ass Backward Poll Result Posting

Must be the new Times' owners.

[kayob1]

17. Yeah, it was VERY annoying.

Boneheads. I almost had a heart attack myself.

[lligrd]

19. 52% For McCain Was Quite Disconcerting

I know CA can be strange but...

[meow mix]

7. ok they should have voted for obama if they want him so bad..

grr

[lligrd]

16. Obama Didn't Stand A Chance In CA

so early. Nobody had heard much about him and very few got to see him.

[SalmonChantedEvening]

22. done! k&r!

:hi: