Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Scare Tactics and Our Surveillance Bill"-By Rockefeller, Leahy, Reyes & Conyers (Wapo)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 07:54 AM
Original message
"Scare Tactics and Our Surveillance Bill"-By Rockefeller, Leahy, Reyes & Conyers (Wapo)
Scare Tactics and Our Surveillance Bill

By Jay Rockefeller, Patrick Leahy, Silvestre Reyes and John Conyers
Monday, February 25, 2008; Page A15

Nothing is more important to the American people than our safety and our freedom. As the chairmen of the House and Senate intelligence and judiciary committees, we have an enormous responsibility to protect both.

Unfortunately, instead of working with Congress to achieve the best policies to keep our country safe, once again President Bush has resorted to scare tactics and political games.

First, our country did not "go dark" on Feb. 16 when the Protect America Act (PAA) expired. Despite President Bush's overheated rhetoric on this issue, the government's orders under that act will last until at least August. These orders could cover every known terrorist group and foreign target. No surveillance stopped. If a new member of a known group, a new phone number or a new e-mail address is identified, U.S. intelligence can add it to the existing orders, and surveillance can begin immediately.

If President Bush truly believed that the expiration of the Protect America Act caused a danger, he would not have refused our offer of an extension.

..............

It is clear that he and his Republican allies, desperate to distract attention from the economy and other policy failures, are trying to use this issue to scare the American people into believing that congressional Democrats have left America vulnerable to terrorist attack.

more at:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/24/AR2008022401668.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mirrera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. I am supposed to be relieved that the TELE COMS are still spying?
Who in their right minds believes that anything this regime does is for our safety? They can frame this a million different ways, they are still spying on us, the patriot act still denies our civil rights, we are still torturing people. Everything this administration does is for power, period. We the people are treated as the enemy more than any "terrorist". If I were a Saudi, I would be more "protected" than I am now. It is all such Bull.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. But didn't Rockefeller vote for immunity for the telecoms?
He gave the bushes exactly what they wanted but the House of Representatives Did Not. Now Rockefeller is bashing bush. So why didn't Rockefeller see the light Before he voted for the bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. Running fucking commercials in AZ to call Harry Mitchell because
Congress left for ten days instead of passing authorization to spy on us. Commercial contains the usual scare shit. I called Harry just to see, all voice mail boxes full. I do not know whether this was due to response to this bullshit or just because it was the weekend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC