|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:58 PM Original message |
Poll question: AA continued flight to NY after passenger died due to their negligence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. SOP is to continue on if there's no threat to the passengers or the aircraft. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yeah, but SOP isn't LAW -- they should have made an exception. My opinion, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:13 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Does the law require the plane to land immediately if there is a death aboard? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:17 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. There are situations where following the LAW might not be the best course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. For jurisdictionaly purposes in case there was foul play |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:23 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Yup. Precisely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:21 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. FAA regulations require providing assistance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
idovoodoo (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. No and it would be an idiotic law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Legally, AA had a duty to protect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
3. Not diverting to Miami is the least troublin thing about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
6. "... but the [oxygen] tank was empty." Very nice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Some of these charges are being disputed by AA -- so we'll learn more as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:24 PM Response to Reply #6 |
14. make that TWO oxygen tanks were empty. Negligence - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
9. I know if I were a family member waiting in NY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. AA should have paid for the extra trips from Miami |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:39 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. There was a doctor on board |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:33 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. If there was a doctor on board |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:38 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. That's why they're screwn when this one gets to court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
idovoodoo (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 08:09 PM Response to Reply #17 |
27. Are you a medical doctor as well as a lawyer? I'm impressed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapfog_1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:00 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. nope, I asked my brother in law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
11. I don't mind not diverting to Miami. Their treatment of her before her death, however, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
16. The issue is not where she died; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
21. Back when airlines gave a damn, I was on a flight that turned around ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanctified (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
22. AA is denying that the Oxygen tanks were empty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Stranger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
23. That could be criminally negligent homicide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
24. Sounds like negligence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
25. If she was dead, why divert? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
idovoodoo (365 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 05:33 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. If she wanted to go to Miami she would have a bought a ticket to go there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC