Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WH To "Fearmongering Dems" - It's The Immunity, Stupid

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 06:30 PM
Original message
WH To "Fearmongering Dems" - It's The Immunity, Stupid
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 06:31 PM by kpete
It's The Immunity, Stupid
By Paul Kiel - February 25, 2008, 5:56PM

Q So what does the White House think of the op-ed from the Democrats that accuse the President of using scare tactics and playing political games? And they say if the President really believed the expiration of the act created a danger, he should have accepted their offer for an extension.
MS. PERINO: Well, one, the House proved that they couldn't even pass an extension, so that wasn't an option. An extension wasn't an option. But we had a response to the op-ed, that I issued.

I think that fear-mongering and the use of the phrase "scare tactics" is something that the Democrats -- it must be, like, one of their favorite words, or it must poll very well, because they use it almost every time.

.....................

The issue really right now between the House and the Senate, as far as I can tell, the biggest issue is retroactive liability protection, and in their op-ed they just had a passing glance to that issue. But it is one of the biggest sticking points, because at the end of the day if we don't have the companies helping us, then we won't have a program.


......................

Q Yes, but if it's such -- if it's so urgent to protect the nation's security, as you have said --

MS. PERINO: But, Bill, it still didn't do what -- the things that I have said repeatedly that it needs to do. Even if they had extended it, it doesn't provide for retroactive liability protection, which is what the companies say that they need.

more at:
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/white_house_keeps_beating_that.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ms. Perino, a question . . .
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 06:39 PM by Jack Rabbit
Are we talking about the same Bush White House that pressured Homeland Security to raise the color alert when things weren't looking right? The same White House that, during the run up to the Iraq invasion (for which all given reasons were false, I might add) never failed to mention Saddam and September 11 in the same sentence? Is that the White House that is accusing congressional Democrats of fear mongering?

And what makes Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney think they're going to get retroactive immunity from Congress? Or that they deserve it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC