Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Karl Rove's Glass House Problem: Or How Governor W. Used the Texas Lottery To Pay Off Ben Barnes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:28 PM
Original message
Karl Rove's Glass House Problem: Or How Governor W. Used the Texas Lottery To Pay Off Ben Barnes
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 09:11 PM by McCamy Taylor
Sometimes, I think Karl Roves gets his ideas for how to smear his opponents by looking at the real crimes of the Bush family. The charge that Alberto Gonzales’ Grand High Inquisitors created----making it a crime to re-appoint someone to a state board after he has donated money to a state lottery campaign---absolutely pales in comparison to what went on when George W. Bush was governor of Texas.

Remember Ben Barnes? The Democratic former Texas Speaker who helped W. evade the draft and get a spot in the Texas Air National Guard ahead of other men, back during the Vietnam War? That favor he did for the Bush family really paid off. Here is a link to the story from WorldNetDaily (so we are not talking the liberal media here):

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=46665

What GTECH revealed in its 1997 10-K was that the company was under investigation in Texas because of allegations against one of its paid consultants, one Ben Barnes, who previously had been lieutenant governor of Texas. GTECH hired Barnes in 1991, before the company had the Texas Lottery contract, because Barnes claimed to have influence with then-governor of Texas, Ann Richards. For getting GTECH the Texas contract in 1992, Barnes received somewhere between 3.5 to 4 percent of GTECH's gross Texas Lottery revenue, a percentage that yielded Barnes somewhere in the range of $3 million a year.

The 1997 GTECH 10-K noted that the company was under investigation in Texas and its contract had been open to competitive bid. GTECH disclosed that Texas Lottery contract was then the company's largest contract, accounting for 16 percent of GTECH's total revenue in fiscal 1997. Losing this contract would materially hurt GTECH's operating income and depress its stock price as a consequence. GTECH ran for cover by terminating Ben Barnes contract and paying him $23 million to stay quiet.

Why did Barnes hold out until 1997? He was a Democrat with influence over Democrat Gov. Ann Richards, but what hold did he have on Republican Gov. George W. Bush?


You already know what he had over Bush, because I just told you. He knew that W. got into the National Guards—and avoided going to Vietnam with the riffraff to die—due to favoritism. However, as usual, the cover up was much worse than the crime.

Things went on the way they were until 1997 when someone noticed that everything about the Texas State Lottery was illegal, including its habit of hiring former state officials like Ben Barnes. A new executive director named Larry Littwin was brought in.

He decided to put the GTECH contract up for competitive bid. Mr. Littwin was ordered by the Texas Lottery Commission, including Harriet Miers, to stop his investigation. On Oct. 29, 1997, only five months after he had been hired, Mr. Littwin was fired by the Texas Lottery Commission, whose only state reason was that they had "lost confidence" in him.


Littwin sued and during the discovery phase, his attorney questioned Barnes and obtained testimony in which “he disclosed his alleged involvement with the Bush National Guard controversy and his political influence peddling for GTECH through the first two years of Bush's term as governor of Texas.”

Littwin was able to settle with GTECH in exchange for suppressing these incriminating documents. And the contract was re-awarded to GTECH.

Here is James Moore, at Huffington Post, on the same story (so left and right agree on this one):

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jim-moore/bush-miers-the-guard-a_b_8587.html

Barnes had been hired by G-Tech, and had signed a lifetime contract giving him a percentage of revenues generated by the lottery. In the late 1960s, Barnes was also Speaker of the Texas House of Representatives. As one of the two most influential people in the Texas legislature during those years, Barnes frequently took requests from people interested in getting their sons enlisted in the Texas National Guard. Enrollment in the Army or Air National Guard was considered a legitimate method for avoiding the draft, and not fighting in Vietnam. As a result, there were more than 100,000 young men on waiting lists around the country, hoping to get enrolled. Usually, they were drafted before the Guard called. Waiting lists were often up to five years long. A friend, or family member, who wanted to get George W. Bush into the National Guard, would have had to contact Barnes or someone on his staff.


So, obviously, if young W. got into the National Guard , he did it through Ben Barnes. When Republican Governor W. took over in Austin, there was no question that Barnes’ company, GTech would continue to manage the lucrative Texas State Lottery. In 1994 W. had sworn that no special influence was used to get him into the National Guard. He needed to keep Barnes happy to keep that story from being revealed to be the lie it was.

However, according to Moore, an anonymous letter made the rounds in Texas in 1997, including the federal attorney.

“Several months ago many of us felt that the Lottery Commission should re-bid the G-Tech contract when it came up for renewal,” the unsigned and undated letter said. “Leaders of the Republican Party strongly supported re-bidding and I believe the chair of the commission also wanted to re-bid. It is now time to disclose at least one reason why it was not re-bid. Governor Bush thru Reggie Bashur made a deal with Ben Barnes not to re-bid because Barnes could confirm that Bush had lied during the ’94 campaign. During that campaign, Bush was asked if his father, then a member of Congress, had helped him get in the National Guard. Bush said no, he had not, but the fact is his dad called then Lt. Gov. Ben Barnes to ask for his help to get his son not just in the Guard, but to get one of the coveted pilot slots, which were extremely hard to get. At the time contacted General Rose at the Guard and took care of it. George Bush was placed ahead of thousands of young men, some of whom died in Vietnam.

Bashur was sent to talk to Barnes who agreed never to confirm the story and the Governor talked to the chair of the Lottery two days later and she then agreed to support letting G-Tech keep the contract without a bid. Too many people know this happened. Governor Bush knows his election campaign might have a different result if this story had been confirmed at the time.”


After the lawsuits were settled and the tell-tale depositions had been buried, Barnes issued a public statement saying that he did not do any favors for the Bush family. GTech bought out his interest in their company for $23million. And that was that. Or it would have been that. Except that in 2004, Ben Barnes told the whole truth for the first time to Dan Rather for a 60 Minutes II episode.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/09/09/politics/main642197.shtml

"I would describe it as preferential treatment. There were hundreds of names on the list of people wanting to get into the Air National Guard or the Army National Guard," he said. "I think that would have been a preference to anybody that didn't want to go to Vietnam or didn’t want to leave. We had a lot of young men that left and went to Canada in the '60s and fled this country. But those that could get in the Reserves, or those that could get in the National Guard - chances are they would not have to go to Vietnam."


Which is pretty amazing, after all the millions Barnes had made off the citizens of Texas by not saying it. Makes you wonder why he decided to go ahead and talk to Dan Rather in 2004. Barnes was giving up his chance to extort the Bush family forever, so he was losing a lot for no return. Unless someone told him to talk to 60 Minutes to make sure that the Bush AWOL story was run, Barnes being the star witness and all.

My own theory (as I have described before) is that Rove wanted the Bush AWOL story to run, because he planned to attack Rather and his team, in order to have them tied up during the days preceding and following the 2004 election. I believe that Sumner Redstone was party to this plan. Rove knew that the election results would provoke controversy, with the voter disenfranchisement in Ohio and Florida, and the likelihood of e-vote/exit poll discrepancies in Ohio high. The last thing that he wanted was the Rather investigative news team on the scene reporting on the stories as they happened. The fall of Dan Rather would also serve as a warning to other investigative reporters. Stick your nose into Bush family business, and it would get chopped off

Anyway, we have come full circle, now that 60 Minutes has reported on Karl Rove’s attempt to create a bogus lottery scandal in Alabama to take out a political enemy and stage a political coup. What Siegelman is accused of doing is nothing compared to the crimes of Governor George W. Bush, who allowed a firm to overcharge the state for its lottery work so that Ben Barnes would keep quiet about a secret that would jeopardize his political career and who, when the conspiracy was uncovered, participated in a cover up with the assistance of Harriet Miers. Siegelman is charged with letting someone keep a state board appointment after he donated money to a state lottery fund. Is that even a crime? Not according to CBS.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/02/21/60minutes/main3859830_page2.shtml

Is Don Siegelman in prison because he’s a criminal or because he belonged to the wrong political party in Alabama? Siegelman is the former governor of Alabama, and he was the most successful Democrat in that Republican state. But while he was governor, the U.S. Justice Department launched multiple investigations that went on year after year until, finally, a jury convicted Siegelman of bribery.

Now, many Democrats and Republicans have become suspicious of the Justice Department’s motivations. As correspondent Scott Pelley reports, 52 former state attorneys-general have asked Congress to investigate whether the prosecution of Siegelman was pursued not because of a crime but because of politics.


Memo to Karl Rove: People who live in glass houses should not throw stones.

PS

I found another link here

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-fund/lotto-trouble_b_9291.html

The New York Sun has reported that Lawrence Littwin, a former executive director of the Lottery Commission, is eager to testify should the Senate subpoena him. Mr. Littwin claims that in 1997 Ms. Miers fired him after five months on the job because she was protecting GTECH, the controversial Rhode Island firm managing the lottery. GTECH had been mired in controversy for years, and in 1996 David Smith, its national sales director, was convicted in New Jersey in a kickback scheme involving a lobbyist.

Mr. Littwin has alleged that aides to then-Gov. Bush were worried that should GTECH lose its lottery contract, its top lobbyist, Mr. Barnes, would discuss efforts he claimed to have made to push a young George W. Bush to the top of the coveted waiting list for a pilot's slot in the Texas Air National Guard.


Littwin was precluded, by the terms of his lawsuit settlement, from discussing what he had learned about the sweetheart deal between Barnes, GTECH and Gov. Bush, but had the Harriet Miers nomination gone forward, he might have been called to testify about the role she played in covering up for W.

No wonder Democrats were so eager to see her nomination proceed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why didn't the DoJ step in and do a FEDERAL INVESTIGATION of GTech deal?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That was Janet Reno, stickler for the law. It was probably a state matter.
Which I would have guessed the Siegelman matter to be, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
east texas lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Texas government has always been for sale for CHEAP!
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 10:30 PM by east texas lib
But the shrub made it an art form. A proud tradition which continues to this day under Gov. Goodhair.
It's the state where Bo Pilgrim walked around the floor of the Texas Senate handing out $10,000.00
checks just before a vote on "workmans comp reform". It is where shrub brought in Industry Lobbyists
to "help" write our clean air and energy policies. Their "suggestions" became law. Texas is where
the law is an easily manipulated tool used by the business interests to achieve their financial aims.
I'm sure Rove fit right in. It is where the present governor has, in concert with a consortium of
private companies head by the Spanish construction conglomerate Cintra, attempted to pull off the
largest taking of privately owned land in history , The Texas Trans Corridor. And it would be
Cintra's privately operated toll corridor of rail lines an high speed express for trucking. But
bidness is bidness, and one must not stand in the way of progress! You can poke around a bit @
dallasnews.com and have some fun.;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ku Klux Karl's instruction
comes from the pages of Mein Kampf and 1984. His sentencing should include: Lowered head first into oil refinery smokestack, continuous listening to the recorded voices of loved ones who lost someone in one of Bush's wars, compelled to work in a veterans hospital, cleaning bed pans and scrubbing commodes with a tooth brush, constantly being told he's about to be released from custody only to be returned to confinement at the last minute, paraded in nothing but an undersized speedo :puke: :puke: :puke: every day.
see the rest here
http://buffalobeast.com/91/50.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R K&R K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. No secret to Texans. "Texas Monthly" reported on all this years ago ...
but no one listened to warnings from Texas. Thanks to the Money$treamMedia, they were barely even heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. But the DOJ has raised the pie so high now. If Siegelman got 7 years, what would W. get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mister Ed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. Can't have a GTECH/TX lottery thread without more details about Harriet Miers:
An October 7 New York Times article explored in detail Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers's tenure as chairwoman of the Texas Lottery Commission but failed to make a key connection between her dual roles with the lottery commission and with the re-election campaign of then-Gov. George W. Bush. While Miers was chairwoman of the commission, the former executive director filed suit, claiming that he was fired to ensure that allegations were not made public that then-Gov. Bush had gained acceptance into the Texas Air National Guard in 1968 as a result of political favors. At roughly the same time -- and also during her tenure as chairwoman -- Miers was paid by Bush's re-election campaign to investigate Bush's Guard record in order to deflect allegations that Bush received preferential treatment.

Allegations about political favors playing a role in Bush's National Guard career first arose in the midst of a lawsuit filed by Lawrence Littwin, the former executive director of the lottery commission who was both hired and fired during Miers's tenure. Littwin had reportedly been investigating what he considered improper political contributions made by Gtech, a company which had a contract to run the Texas lottery. In his lawsuit, Littwin claimed that Gtech pressured the commission to fire him by threatening to reveal that the company had paid lobbyist Ben Barnes $23 million to keep Barnes from publicly claiming that he pulled strings in order to get Bush into the Guard.

In her capacity at the commission, Miers was directly involved with Littwin's dismissal in October 1997. Littwin's lawsuit claimed that after he began looking into financial ties between the company and Texas lawmakers, Gtech pushed Miers to fire him . After a federal judge in Texas ruled that Miers did not have to testify in Littwin's lawsuit to provide an explanation for why Littwin was fired, Gtech settled Littwin's lawsuit for $300,000.

Subsequently -- and while still serving on the commission -- Miers was paid $19,000 by Bush's re-election campaign to investigate his National Guard record in order to "identify potential vulnerabilities early on and deflect any charges that Bush got favorable treatment," according to a July 17, 2000, Newsweek article. Newsweek reported that Barnes's allegations were a key part of Miers's investigation. That would mean that the Miers investigation -- and therefore Bush himself -- potentially benefited from Miers's knowledge of and involvement in the lottery commission.


http://mediamatters.org/items/200510080003

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mojowork_n Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. It was Bush, Sr, calling Sid Adger, who then visited Ben Barnes
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 03:37 PM by mojowork_n
I just read this a little while ago, in Mary Mapes' book, "Truth and Duty: The Press, The President and the Privilege of Power," page 57,

"Barnes claimed that in 1968 Sid Adger, a Houston oilman and friend of the Bush family, came to Barnes's office and asked for assistance in getting young George W. Bush into the Guard as a pilot. Barnes admitted being an ambitious politician who believed he was at the beginning of a long and promising political career and wanted to win friends almost any way he could... Barnes claimed he called his close friend Gen. James Rose, then the head of the Texas Air National Guard, on young Bush's behalf. Bush was quickly accepted, Barnes said."

Mary Mapes was the CBS 60 Minutes news producer who broke the Abu Graib prison abuse story, and was privileged to be hung out to dry and publicly humiliated by her network's corporate ownership (Sumner Redstone), when they "investigated" reporting on the Bush National Guard service (Jerry Killian) memos. That is to say the network 'investigated' by appointing a panel of all lawyers, with one retired former news exec included, for form's sake.

http://www.truthandduty.com/


Edit addition, FYI:

From page 296:, "...Redstone, Viacom's chairman and big chief, knew that the Bush administration didn't shy away from playing favorites with corporations and businesses who went along with the program. Viacom's billionaire boss chose to lay down his cards in the early going, declaring on September 24, 2004, that he was voting for President Bush because he saw Bush as being best for business. 'I look at the election from what's good for Viacom,' Redstone said... The cynical interpretation would be that Redstone, an acknowledged lifelong 'liberal Democrat' who once took a certain perverse pride in having appeared on Richard Nixon's enemies list, made his unsolicited endorsement purely for business reasons four days after CBS's surrender over the Killian documents. But I'm not a cynic. I believe it is quite possible that Redstone had a real political change of heart, deciding that the Bush-created deficit, the growing difficulties in Iraq, the questions about abuse of war detainees, and the soaring price of oil were some of the 'good for Viacom' factors that pushed him into the Bush column."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hit the Rove on the pinhead, McCamy Taylor! Thank you.
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 04:20 PM by Octafish
Inspiration, to Rove, comes from the crimes of the Bush Family Evil Empire.



"Hey! Lookit me! I'm a real jet pilot. Heh heh heh."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 22nd 2024, 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC