Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Trachtenberg II: The Academic Working Poor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:09 PM
Original message
Trachtenberg II: The Academic Working Poor

http://chronicle.com/review/brainstorm/index.php?id=239

Crossposted from howtheuniversityworks.com

I was a bit surprised that Stephen chose to ignore my second invitation to talk about the plight of the majority faculty — those who serve contingently — and, instead, indulged in a speculative ad hominem flight of fancy that ends with inviting me to leave the academy!

(“I’m sorry Mr. Bousquet is so unhappy in the academy… Surely so articulate a man could do many things. I disliked being a lawyer so I found an alternative career.”)

For the record, I’m very happy in the academy. Like the hundreds of thousands of academic unionists and many others, I’m willing to stay and fight to make this a place where administrations don’t reside in mansions on half-million dollar salaries when an impoverished faculty are standing in line for free cheese.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkuovJRIZr0&eurl=http://chronicle.com/review/brainstorm/index.php?id=239

I don’t think going ad hominem was wise for Stephen, who will recognize in that last sentence a reference to his own housing and salary while he was fighting the unionization of adjunct faculty at GWU, ending in the judgment by a Bush-packed NLRB that his administration had broken the law in its creative efforts to justify its refusal to bargain with the legally elected representative of the faculty, SEIU.

In part III of my reply, unless Stephen has something substantial to say about the actual issues of actual faculty, I’ll say more about contingency at GWU. In Part IV, I’ll explain the concept of “feminization” of sectors of the workforce, and how it affects gender equity. Either in that part or a follow-up, I’ll discuss the tired old canard that “the market” is the reason male-dominated disciplines have fat salaries. (In a nutshell: markets are socially constructed — corporations are the first to complain when they feel a “market” needs “adjusting.”)

In the meanwhile, do take a look at Part II of my interview with Cary Nelson, The Academic Working Poor.
Posted at 09:22:32 PM on February 24, 2008 | All postings by Marc Bousquet

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC