Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

REMINDER: Waxman hearing on WH missing email's: Today at 10 am.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:02 AM
Original message
REMINDER: Waxman hearing on WH missing email's: Today at 10 am.
Should be very interesting since Waxman didn't "buy" White House spokesman Tony Fratto's newest spin... he (Fratto) went before the press corps and said: "What missing e-mails?"

"We have no reason to believe that any e-mail at all are missing," Fratto said.

But Henry Waxman ain't buying.
http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/30811

LIVE STREAMING WILL BE UP AT: www.oversight.house.gov

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder if this will be plastered all over the TV like the steroids were.
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 10:03 AM by originalpckelly
:shrug:

I doubt it.

At least they're doing real work today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not even on CSPAN.
:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Capital Hearings is part of C-Span... U.S. Congressional Hearings:
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 10:14 AM by Breeze54
U.S. Congressional Hearings: schedule
http://www.capitolhearings.org/

Committee Holds Hearing on Electronic Records Preservation at the White House

The Committee is holding a hearing entitled “Electronic Records Preservation at the White House.”

Click here for live video of the hearing. http://oversight.house.gov/story.asp?ID=1765
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. thanks... I looked there too early for link...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
36. You're quite welcome.
I'm getting a spotty feed (dial up) so every time I click on DU to post, the audio breaks up. Argh!

So, I didn't reply to you right away...waiting for it to settle down. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
113. good, thanks for the heads up and link!
you guys :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I want to see Waxman fired up. I like that!
When we see anyone get pissed as they SHOULD, it feels good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wonder about 'missing emails' & bush desperation over TELECOM immunity
Thinkin' cheney got a ransom note that 'lost emails' are not completely lost until TELECOMS have complete immunity for their past cooperation.

Live by the tap, die by the tap, uh, unca dick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. connecting the dots...
we should have our priv. investigator's license by now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Dot Connecters Inc
dat's us!

It all makes sense when you just step back so you can see more than one issue at a time. Don't know why that ability is so damned rare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Catchy!! Let's be founders....
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. Thank you. Nothing like a good hearing to pass the day n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Glad you're here!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Wouldn't miss it for the world. Waxman's such a pleasure to hear
And you're what makes DU my first destination in the AM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flor de jasmim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. Thanks for posting the link for live streaming
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. anytime... especially when important hearings are not announced as much as they should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. They should haul in the IT guys
they know where all the emails are buried
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. List of witnesses
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 10:18 AM by halobeam
The following witnesses are expected to testify:




Alan R. Swendiman, Director, Office of Administration

Theresa Payton, Chief Information Officer, Office of Administration

The Honorable Allen Weinstein, Archivist of the United States

Gary M. Stern, General Counsel, National Archives and Records Administration

Sharon Fawcett, Assistant Archivist for Presidential Libraries


edit to respond further: Hopefully this hearing will result in IT witnesses to appear next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
15. how would I get this to play in VLC media player as it is the only video player I have loaded
thanks in advance :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I don't see which player the webcast is streaming on
so I can't help you in this. I'm sorry.. maybe someone else who knows the player you have, can help.

Anyone here know how to play this on VLC player?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #15
35. It didn't give me a choice when I clicked the viddeo link...it's using Windows Media player
on my 'puter. I guess I don't have a choice or they're not using Real Player anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #15
92. It won't play in your browser?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
19. Speak ENGLISH! Motherfuckers!
Good God, no wonder people don't want to fucking watch this bullshit, they're bogged down in the bullshit.

"Point of order Mr. Chairman."

"The Gentleasshole, Mr. Hellhole, from Tennessee is recognized."

"Mr. Chairman, I have to break wind."

"Unanimous consent request for Mr. Hellhole to break wind."

"Mr. Chairman, I have an objection."

"What is the objection."

"I think that would blow."

"Of course it would, the Gentleasshole is about to break wind. Objection denied."

"Mr. Hellhole proceed, please."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. we need a Hearing to English/English to Hearing dictionary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. spitting coffee everywhere
damn you missed your calling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. "Mr. Chairman, the Gentlemember, Madokie, is spitting coffee all over the rostrum."
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 10:33 AM by originalpckelly
"Madokie, please refrain from future outbursts of coffee."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. please, nasal starbucks are inherently out of order....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice for Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #19
44. LOL! Yep. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
22. Right Davis... all missing email's were labeled incorrectly
I'm getting dizzy ... again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
24. this shit is really hard to watch.....waxman should tell the 'minority' to shut the fuck up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. he's usually reliable for a few good zingers.
Let's see how they try to circumvent the questions, because that's what seems to jerk his chain, in particular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
26. Ralph Nader would've had hearings last week.
The Democrats are nothing but time wasters.:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. ralph who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. I know. I'm a baaaad boy.
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
28. "If it is determined there are missing email's".... huh?
oh he's spouting the Fratto new spin....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. well sir, if they are not missing, produce them. Now. Immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. it is so obvious, it's mind-boggling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. uh, sir, where are the e-mails? cut the crap.
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 10:52 AM by spanone
here comes the bullshit alert.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. so they want us to prove they don't exist..... proving a negative?
we asked for them, they said they were gone. Patrick Fitzgerald spoke regarding this during the Libby trial. WH said they didn't have them. Now they say they aren't missing. So...

give them to us. Holy God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
37. Thanks
Watching -who is this woman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. I believe
Theresa Payton, Chief Information Officer, Office of Administration

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #38
41. Thanks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
39. I can't get the live streaming to work is there anywhere else to watch this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. did you try this link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. This is the direct link to the stream - It uses WMP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #43
47. Don't know what I am dong wrong but it doesn't work for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. summary so far...
panel witness were told by WH they are trying to get emails... and Waxman was told by RNC as of yesterday... the WH never requested any info to get missing emails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. Thanks.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. Do you have Windows Media Player installed on your computer?
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 11:17 AM by Breeze54
Is it up to date or have you updated it? :shrug:

OK...at the very bottom of the Capital Hearings schedule page is says: Hearings require the free RealPlayer

Sorry about that.

Maybe it's just my computer insisting on using WMP.

Do you have RealPlayer on your computer? Is that up to date?

Try opening RealPlayer and paste this link in the browser on RP.
http://oversight.house.gov/story.asp?ID=1765
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #50
56. Tried it I think I will give up and check back here for updates. Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
42. Waxman asking Weinstein whether he's concerned about
the years of missing Rove emails using RNC leading up to the war (that period of time)...

"oh yes, we are concerned".. blech

Waxman states Rove's RNC emails are "rule not exception" for his correspondence...

Directs this to Stern and Weinstein, reiterating they asked what steps are being taken to restore emials...
and now asking has WH taken steps to restore emails? Weinstein said WH said the process is incomplete.. and they are "trying" and now heard from RNC they aren't doing that..(Stern said)

RNC told Waxman yesterday... WH taken no effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #42
45. Are these people graduates of
Fundie universities?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #45
53. sounds like.
They have nothing for this hearing. Nothing at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
46. They sent letters asking for staff to "pretty pwease" send us those RNC e-mails...
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 11:13 AM by Breeze54
Yeah, like that's going to happen!! :crazy:

And they still haven't found any e-mails? BS!!!

That guy testifying sounds like a 'scared wabbit"!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #46
51. right, but at the same time... "what missing email's?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #51
54. That's the * Co. mantra! -- "huh? What?"
Asshole criminals!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. yet it'll cost 15 milliion to recover "non-missing emails"
oh I wish we could question them for just ten freakin' minutes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #55
59. Yeah and with a rubber hose!
I heard that. $15 Million? Huh? They just want to steal/borrow even
more $$ and make it disappear, just like the $30 (?) billion missing in Iraq!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
48. Thank you for posting this. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
57. K & R & Impeach two too. It is time to construct ....
It is time to construct an e-mail timeline with analysis of what transpires during the missing times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
58. LOL Davis says, "this is email, it's fairly new" a decade new.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #58
60. roflmao!
Did he just say that Rove may not want to share an e-mail he sent or received from his girlfriend? Wha?! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #60
61. yeah, and he called us "peeping toms"
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 11:29 AM by halobeam
hypocrite!! Bet he voted to spy on every American... the ultimate voyeur.

edit to correct.. ISSA called us that... twice now.:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
62. Answer the ?! -"R there any official Docs, that by law should've been archived by the WH, on the RNC
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 11:35 AM by Breeze54
e-mail server? Do any of you know of any thing used by Karl Rove
or of him using the RNC to circumvent and evade the WH e-mail/archives?"

Wow!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
63. Edited.... Didn't someone have the website RNC.com and received a bunch of emails
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 11:38 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
from WH employees?

The actual RNC site is RNC.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #63
64. Greg Palast, I think...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #64
68. OK. my mistake it GeorgeWBush.org. Here is a snip from a Palast article
However, Griffin made a wee mistake. Instead of sending the emails — potential evidence of a crime — to email addresses ending with the domain name “@GeorgeWBush.com” he sent them to “@GeorgeWBush.ORG.” A website run by prankster John Wooden who owns “GeorgeWBush.org.” When Wooden got the treasure trove of Rove-ian ravings, he sent them to us.

http://www.gregpalast.com/bushs-new-us-attorney-a-criminal/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
65. MICA .. another one stating email's a "new era"....
jees.. takes a decade to get a clue how to archive them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
66. cut the mic.... on MICA...
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 12:04 PM by halobeam
lol Waxman does.. and says.. has nothing to do w/ this hearing.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:47 AM
Original message
sandy berger....what a crock of shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
67. Are you kidding me!?! This asshat is again yelling; "Clinton! Clinton!"
And he's bringing up Sandy Berger? :wtf: What is this fucking assholes name??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
69. Go at it Watson... lol "It's a simple question, yes or no!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
70. WHAT THE FUCK???
JUST GIVE THEM THE GODDAMNED EMAILS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
71. the emails have been destroyed by the white house....begin impeachment hearings....now
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 11:55 AM by spanone
i want to know what is in the goddam emails. why the stonewalling....what arrogance. the peoples' business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
72. Tierney... addressing missing Cheney emails
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #72
74. ...related to valerie plame wilson !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
73. No e-mails to be found at all on Oct. 1st and had to to with Valerie Plame Wilson.
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 12:02 PM by Breeze54
What happened to them? Hmmm? Inquiring minds want to know!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
75. 'we have not finished our analysis'.....= stonewalling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. And she's referring to a "Phase 2" which = enough time that
booosh will be out of office -- maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #76
77. 17 million emails....bullshit numbers..stonewalling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
78. what the hell is that question? california epa standards? clinton administration? WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #78
80. ZOOM... guy is "out there" .. may as well discuss the space wars, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
79. Who is this guy that keeps taking the hearing to Clinton's presidency?
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 12:05 PM by Breeze54
Why isn't Waxman cutting this operative off?!

He's asking about EPA docs? From back before 2000???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #79
84. He's actually blaming a change in SW, that they failed to implement, on Clinton!
He just won't quit with the thinly veiled accusations & remarks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
81. Waxman needs to cut into this idiot...
make clear this isn't about the Clinton administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #81
82. gentlemans time has fucking expired....yessir mr waxman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
83. Er...eh...what's this new-fangled thing they're talking about called
"e-mail"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #83
86. this is amazing....our incompetent goverment in it's full glory
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #86
87. I just checked my Outlook Express and my storage...
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 12:13 PM by Texas Explorer
I have emails on my computer right now that go all the way back to 2004. And the emails I have from before that are on a CD I can see from where I'm sitting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #87
93. What?! You can actually store e-mails on a CD?!
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 12:16 PM by Breeze54
:sarcasm:

Because the earlier guy said that they weren't sure how they would "store" the e-mails for the archives!!!

Such liars or dumbasses!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #83
124. Almost positive it has something to do with a series of tubes.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #124
127. LMAO!
:P

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
85. What's this guys name that just talked about comps being scrubbed/washed?
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 12:10 PM by halobeam
I can't see it on the screen.

Waxman needs to get her ass into a hearing.


panel woman calls it "process", when it's a crime. Holy crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #85
88. mr waxman, let's call all sixty contractors in to testify...someone did the deed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #88
90. Henry isn't interjecting here much at all... not w/ comment yet.
Oh Henry!....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #85
89. There it is... can't talk about this classified info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #85
91. I don't know but that looks like an Impeach Bush button on his lapel!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
94. the white house has done NOTHING to comply with request....on behalf of the national archives
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 12:17 PM by spanone

to retrieve the e-mails

this guy is good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #94
96. Of course they haven't... they've been wiped clean off the RNC servers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
95. Thats right. No one from WH on panel to show they've take one concrete step.
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 12:18 PM by halobeam
Subpeona them, but they won't show.

Write stern letter.

They will iggy you.

Contempt charge? Check.

next?

nothing.

edit to add: after nothing....

Hold hearings on steriod use in gymnastics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #95
115. oops
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 01:16 PM by Breeze54
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
97. Are the dentures in this guys mouth loose or what!?!
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
98. The WHITE HOUSE had a "primitive" computer/email system?
ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME???

I don't even have a "pimitive" system on my desk. It's state of the art! Why do I have state of the art equipment and capability and the WHITE HOUSE does not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
99. Norton is nailing her ass. Great JOB!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:35 PM
Original message
She's amazing. Did you see her recent performance on Colbert?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
101. no I missed it... maybe it's on crooks and liars.. I'll have to check
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #101
126. Comedy central has it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
100. Why did Waxman just say he'll leave this question of Norton's "rhetorical"??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #100
102. I hope it's only because Ms. Payton refused to give a satifactory answer. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #102
103. Waxman is allowed to take time at any time, correct?
He's not interjecting in many important points that are being revealed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #103
105. Frustrating, huh? Let's hope he's taking it all in and will
have plenty to say at the conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
104. LOL... we'll be a "10" after this administration ends.
well, I bet you can only go "up"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
106. Sandy Berger again!!!!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
107. asshole
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 12:54 PM by spanone
issa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #107
108. Good. Issa loses! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #107
109. BIG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #109
110. asshole, your time is up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The empressof all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #107
118. When is he up for re election? This year or next?
He has got to be one of the most repulsive Reps out there. I'm not in CA. but I'll send money to what ever Dem is running against him. What an ASS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #118
122. great point. I'll do the same.
I've only contributed to Lamont for the same reasons. Now I'll have to act on this with Issa. He is quite repulsive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
111. mr cummings is good....listen close
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #111
112. Now it's the summer! A FULL YEAR since they first promised
the emails!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #112
125. they ARE running out the clock....and everyone knows it.....c'mon henry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
114. OK Waxman, we are disappointed and WH clearly isn't following the law..
what now?

the stern letter route?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #114
117. Waxman knows the WH is stalling... and that woman --
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 01:18 PM by Breeze54
I seriously doubt she'll be working at the archives come 2009! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
116. Damn... I thought they were going to start duking it out!
Kapow! Wham! Zap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #116
119. I think Gonzo resigned to achieve full-time multi shape-shifting capabilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #119
120. But still stupid, ugly and wearing corrective lenses!
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 01:27 PM by Breeze54
:P

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #120
121. yes, but don't you agree he could've corrected the articulation aspect of one of them?
I've never heard such a poor speaker, the one who they kept telling to "speak up", hardly opened his mouth while speaking, as if his "Fixodent" malfunctioned this morning!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #121
123. Hell yeah but it was as effective as "I don't recal! I don't remember! I don't know! I don't recall!
"I really don't recall and I know 71 times is a lot!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC