Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Is There No Transcript To Don Siegelman's Trial Yet?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:40 PM
Original message
Why Is There No Transcript To Don Siegelman's Trial Yet?
sam seder (who is filling in for randi) was saying this--and apparently siegelman can't appeal until there is a transcript.

(remember that prick judge handcuffed him and took him off to jail rather than letting him go home and get his shit together for a month first?)

how long does it take to get a fucking trial transcript? WHAT THE FUCK IS UP WITH THAT FUCKING JUDGE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
petersjo02 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. The court reporter for his trial
died not long after the trial ended. I don't know the circumstances of reporter's death, suspicious or natural causes. I suspect judge just doesn't bother to assign the transcript to another reporter so that there can be no appeal for as long as it can be stalled. The shit would hit the fan on appeal. GOP/Rove/crooked judge can't risk that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Jimmy Dickens, the court reporter, died fourteen months after the trial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. thanks
This is important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The court reporter's death is just a diversion to distract us from the real story
Judge Fuller is dirty ten ways to Tuesday, and the Siegelman saga is growing legs as I type.

Read mod mom's post downthread, it's the important one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, I know.
I have to learn to type out more of what my thoughts are, sorry.

I mean the fact that she passed away after plenty of time to transcribe the trial was important - it was their intent not to transcribe. I'll go read the other post now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. They use the same goddamn machines! Give it to another reporter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. And the law requires the transcript within 30 days.
It's been 20 months now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. I would think fourteen months is plenty of time to have transcript ready or
it damn sure ought to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
f the letter Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Great question.
Wish the media would ask it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. because everything about this case stinks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. computer virus?
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 04:43 PM by progressoid
:shrug:

edit: I wouldn't hold my breath. It's not like they are a really honest bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. THIS IS WHAT IS UP W THAT FUCKING JUDGE:
The Pork Barrel World of Judge Mark Fuller

BY
Scott Horton
PUBLISHED
August 6, 2007

For the last week, we’ve been examining the role played by Judge Mark Everett Fuller in the trial, conviction, and sentencing of former Alabama Governor Don E. Siegelman. Today, we examine a post-trial motion, filed in April 2007, asking Fuller to recuse himself based on his extensive private business interests, which turn very heavily on contracts with the United States Government, including the Department of Justice.

The recusal motion rested upon details about Fuller’s personal business interests. On February 22, 2007, defense attorneys obtained information that Judge Fuller held a controlling 43.75% interest in government contractor Doss Aviation, Inc. After investigating these claims for over a month, the attorneys filed a motion for Fuller’s recusal on April 18, 2007. The motion stated that Fuller’s total stake in Doss Aviation was worth between $1-5 million, and that Fuller’s income from his stock for 2004 was between $100,001 and $1 million dollars.

In other words, Judge Fuller likely made more from his business income, derived from U.S. Government contracts, than as a judge. Fuller is shown on one filing as President of the principal business, Doss Aviation, and his address is shown as One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama, the address of the Frank M. Johnson Federal Courthouse, in which his chambers are located.
?Annual report details, Doss Aviation, 2002

Doss Aviation, Inc. (motto: “Total Quality Service Isn’t Expensive, It’s Priceless”) and its subsidiary, Aureus International, hold contracts with a number of government agencies. Quoting from defense counsel’s motion for recusal (emphasis in the original):

Doss Aviation, Inc. has been awarded numerous federal military contracts from the United States government worth over $258,000,000, including but not limited to: An August 2002 contract with the Air Force for $30,474,875 for Helicopter Maintenance, a November 2003 contract with the Navy for $5,190,960 for aircraft refueling, a February 2006 contract with the Air Force for over $178,000,000 for training pilots and navigators, and a March 2006 contract with the Air Force for $4,990,541.28 for training at the United States Air Force Academy. The February 2006 contract with the Air Force for over $178,000,000 is for 10 ½ years, but is renewable from year to year . . .

-snip
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/08/hbc-90000762
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. jumpin jehosaphat! pigs do fly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. thanks for posting this. what a son of a bitch: Mark Everett Fuller
what a fucking son of a bitch.

why isn't someone investigating him? is he still on the bench?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. You MUST cut another thread with this info please please please!
Fucking warmonger warprofiteering bastard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. How long ago was he taken off to jail? There should now be a
law that states a time frame. Not an open ended one for filling out a transcript.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. The law says 30 days. But apparently it lacks teeth. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. More info here
www.donsiegelman.org

The transcript was due 30 DAYS after the trial, and it's been more than 20 MONTHS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC