There are 18 schools most likely facing great changes because they could not meet the standards of the No Child Left Behind program. There are no exceptions, no excuses, for not passing the standards set forth by the program voted in by Republicans and Democrats alike.
There are no exceptions for languages barriers, none for special learning problems except in very narrow circumstances (not even sure about that anymore). No understanding given that many of these areas are financially depressed. No exceptions.
Before I retired, the county was allocating more money to schools in some more affluent neighborhoods, schools of choice, magnet schools. Our school met none of those standards. Those schools had new textbooks, better supplies, more necessary equipment. I could not even get a much needed pull down wall map for my class. There was a pre-1991 map of Europe only, and that did not work too well.
But NCLB is now coming into its own...the real true face is coming out now of what it is all about.
It is about changing the public schools by restructuring them into something besides a public school. That is the bottom line. The options offered are all geared toward....wait for it..."privatizing" the public schools.
Here are the options given to these 18 schools if indeed they continue to meet the NCLB standards.
Schools face sanctions...18 in one county.Restructuring a school is the most serious penalty for not meeting AYP, said Sherrie Nickell, the associate superintendent of learning.
Some restructuring options include the school becoming a charter school, replacement of staff or having a separate organization contract to run the school.
Rhonda Ashley, Polk's director of Title I schools, said for some schools the district would choose a fourth, more flexible option, which allows the district to control changes in the schools. Some of those options would include expanding or narrowing grade levels, or extending the school day or year.
See what I mean? Look at the options:
1.
Becoming a charter school. Though they are start up funded with public money, they do not have to meet the regulations that public schools must meet. That is getting into some cloudy areas.
Charter schools do not have to keep students who do not perform to expectation and their standards. Correct me if some of that has changed. Where do you send those students then? Now they send them back to "public" schools whose funding is being taken away for "charter" schools.
2.
Replacement of staff. So sad. Instead of providing support there are only penalties. There are so many good teachers at these 18 schools, laboring without proper tools and books.
3.
Having a separate organization contract to run the school.This is the option that says "privatize" the most loudly. These schools whose funding has been sidetracked for private school vouchers and charter schools, and don't forget magnet schools which get all they need....these schools will now be turned over to a private contractor.
Many schools in Florida have already been "restructured." Very little about it in the news.
Whenever I post about education changes, many come along to tell me how beneficial all these changes are. Actually, all these changes come down to one thing....the destruction of the public school system in America.
Something Howard Dean said in 2003 really hit home. I believe we will be seeing more of these "restructured" schools.
2003 Howard Dean on NCLB... "every school in America by 2013 will be a failing school.""The president's ultimate goal," said former Gov. Howard Dean (D-Vt.), one of the Democrats who now harshly attacks NCLB, "is to make the public schools so awful, and starve them of money, just as he's starving all the other social programs, so that people give up on the public schools."
....."MANCHESTER, N.H. (AP) Democratic presidential hopeful Howard Dean on Sunday urged states to reject federal No Child Left Behind funding, and said he would if still governor of Vermont.
''It's going to cost them more in property taxes and other taxes than they are going to get out of it,'' Dean told The Associated Press following a campaign stop.
..."Every group, including special education kids, has to be at 100 percent to pass the tests,'' Dean said. ''No school system in America can do that. That ensures that every school will be a failing school.''
More from the Columbia Political Review. I have the quotes, but the link seems dated. It is called "Failing to fight failure".
So what can be done when states say they need more money, and the federal government says that they don’t? Unfortunately, the answer looks like nothing. The No Child Left Behind Act is a flawed and dangerously optimistic piece of legislation that simply cannot succeed anywhere near expectations. Worse, it actually has the potential to disrupt the successful programs that states have created by focusing on testing, and it ignores problems such as ballooning classroom size, under-funded English as a Second Language programs, and other basic needs. Even if the Bush administration poured billions more into NCLB to support its goals, the money and wishful thinking still wouldn’t help the education system evolve into a sound model for a decade. The Act is doomed to fail because it does not consider the needs of the states and the speed at which they can institute reform."
I remember teaching with math books that were still back in the last new system being taught. Our books were back in the old New Math, when other schools in richer areas had texts with the really new math system. I remember science books decades old and falling apart. I remember a teacher in a School of Choice which sent their rejects back to us....she laughed and said they had two sets of new texts. One for school and one for home so the children would not be inconvenienced.
This is 2008. Five years until 2013.