Why are none of the talking heads condemning Matt Drudge for putting troops in danger

[ruggerson]

by outing Prince Harry's presence in Afghanistan?

Not a word from the media about this asshole.

[C_U_L8R]

1. clearly they are frightened of him

[ossman]

2. He's got nude pictures of everybody. And a goat.

[Fredda Weinberg]

3. This doesn't belong in GD:P and there's no outrage because this

was manufacturered. The royal family is a PR machine. You've been punked.

[MzShellG]

6. BINGO! nt

[ruggerson]

7. meant to post in GD

my fingers didn't follow my brain.

[Fredda Weinberg]

9. Well don't feel bad ... the royals have been manipulating for centuries

And they're very good at it. You won't find a fingerprint ...

[Bozita]

4. IMHO, it's all theater.

The Prince gets to serve in a war zone. But not for long.

Long enough for many folks, though.

Prince comes home a hero. His comrades remain behind.

Drudge was the fortunate leakee.

[Oleladylib]

11. I don't thinking risking any life is done for theater...ridiculous.

[stahbrett]

5. I thought Drudge linked to an Australian website that had the story

Drudge just gave that website some publicity, but he didn't technically out the Prince.

[cloudythescribbler]

13. Some say an Australian URL, some say German -- but for some reason no one looks at that closely ...

as I would think logic would compel observers to do

[DogPoundPup]

8. Because it is to their benefit to report on where's Harry

instead of how miserably things are actually going there in Talibanland, I mean Afghanistaliban...Fields and fields of poppy land... Afghanistan.

[Oleladylib]

10. Just what we need..Serve up another international disastor...shame on us!

We are the worst kind of tabloid country..not proud...

[Oleladylib]

12. You called him correctly!