Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FDL: Siegelman transcript is finally ready.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 06:52 PM
Original message
FDL: Siegelman transcript is finally ready.
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 06:58 PM by sfexpat2000
First Monday: The Siegelman Case — A Political Prosecution Exposed
By: Scott Horton Monday March 3, 2008 12:00 pm

(FDL is pleased to welcome Scott Horton, who writes No Comment for Harper's, to discuss politicized prosecutions and the Siegelman case for today's installment of First Monday -- our monthly legal discussion in conjunction with Alliance For Justice. As always, please stay on topic and take any off-topic comments to the prior thread. Thanks! -- CHS)


Last Sunday, CBS aired its long-awaited feature on the prosecution and imprisonment of former Alabama Governor Don E. Siegelman.


The CBS piece, for which I was repeatedly interviewed, came through on its promise to deliver several additional bombshells. The most significant of these was the disclosure that prosecutors pushed the case forward and secured a conviction relying on evidence that they knew or should have known was false, and that they failed to turnover potentially exculpatory evidence to defense counsel. The accusation was dramatically reinforced by the Justice Department’s failure to offer a denial. It delivered a fairly elaborate version of a “no comment,” and even that came a full twenty-four hours after it had conferred with the prosecutors in question. The gravity of the accusations made and the prosecutors’ failure to deny them further escalates concerns about the treatment of the former Alabama governor.



http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/03/first-monday-the-siegelman-case-a-political-prosecution-exposed/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R = soooo overdue!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. KIcking for our success. Well done, guys.
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. L.Coyote's strategic compilation. Please go give it a kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Give compilations LINKS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Dammit, Beth, I was just about to post that!
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 07:15 PM by Hissyspit
:P :)

Of course, it doesn't help that I don't have access to my laptop and am on my iPhone and have to tap the posts in letter by letter!

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. This must be the only time ever that I got there first!
Lol!

:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. This is the first time I...
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 07:30 PM by Hissyspit
have felt like Gov. Siegelman has a real chance of having his conviction overturned. Fingers crossed...here's hoping the pressure keeps up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
35. I can't even think about results any more.
But crossing everything, too.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Nothing like pressure
Release Don Siegelman.

K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kick and Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. k and r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
28. Recommended!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisainmilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. Kick and Recommend!
Commented on U tube also. This needs to be EVERYWHERE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ellipsis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. Cool! Big K&R!! n/t
Edited on Mon Mar-03-08 07:38 PM by btmlndfrmr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. The LiveBLOG is a good read! HORTON: "Mukasey is simply engaged in a cover-up."
http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/03/first-monday-the-siegelman-case-a-political-prosecution-exposed/

"... Much of the “steering” that goes on at DOJ is “resource allocation,” and this was a heavy allocation of prosecutorial resources for a corrupt purpose — taking down the former Democratic governor — and keeping attention away from the Abramoff debacle, which had the potential of compromising the Alabama G.O.P. hierarchy...."

"...William Pryor is the man who hatched the Siegelman prosecution. He started piecing together a case against Siegelman almost as soon as Siegelman was elected governor, and he consistently attempted to push the charges off on the U.S. attorney’s office so he himself could sit in the backseat. Interestingly, one of the key allegations against Siegelman came from a man named Lanny Young. When Young came in, he detailed specific allegations of petty corruption against Siegelman, and far more substantial allegations against Pryor and Jeff Sessions, the Alabama senator. The U.S. Attorney had her first assistant, Julia Weller, negotiate a plea-bargain with Young. Ms. Weller is the wife of Chris Weller, who was William Pryor’s attorney. So it would come as a surprise to no one that all the accusations against Pryor, and his mentor, Sessions, were dropped,..."

"... Mukasey’s position on this has consistently been that he will “look at it” after the appeal is completed. This is completely absurd. The question he needs to look at is not whether Siegelman is guilty or innocent, but whether the Justice Department figures involved in the case have violated the basic ethical rules governing their conduct. The evidence of that is overwhelming. The case should have been taken out of the hands of the prosecutors in Alabama and given to independent career prosecutors long ago. Mukasey is simply engaged in a cover-up. ..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. K&R
The pressure is having an impact.
Free Siegelman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
17. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. K&R. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. Ha! Look at this thread!
Thank you. :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinksrival Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. Quote from Horton:

"It’s clear that the Abramoff query trailed off into Alabama, where we say a sizeable eight-figure sum pumped into G.O.P. election efforts. Michael Scanlon who was Abramoff’s “evil twin” was formerly a key staffer to Bob Riley, the man elected as governor of Alabama. When I started tracking the Siegelman matter I kept noticing an amazing coincidence. The people pushing the attack against Siegelman and apparently taken as highly credible by federal prosecutors in Alabama, were individuals who figures as suspects in the Abramoff investigation. Moreover, the two U.S. attorneys in Alabama who should have been pursuing the Abramoff case were off doing other things — in fact, the Siegelman case emerged as their major “public integrity” matter. I don’t think this was a coincidence. Much of the “steering” that goes on at DOJ is “resource allocation,” and this was a heavy allocation of prosecutorial resources for a corrupt purpose — taking down the former Democratic governor — and keeping attention away from the Abramoff debacle, which had the potential of compromising the Alabama G.O.P. hierarchy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #20
34. That hit me like a ton of bricks last week and once you see that
this horrible prosecution makes perfect sense. Horton has fingered the context we're not supposed to see, exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
21. What wonderful words to read
as I had just completed my Monday emails to my reps and the memmbers of the House Judiciary Committee! And that was after receiving my 2nd letter from Governor Don!

My wish is that Don Siegelman will be the one to bring down kkkarl rove. (It could happen.)

Questions to anyone w/the answers:

Now that the transcript from his trial has finally been completed, what is the next step? Does the appeal have to go through the same court? How long does the appeal process take?

Going back to finish reading Scott Horton and others' comments...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinksrival Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. If it wasn't for all who nagged MSNBC........
Horton quote:

"I was notified by one of Siegelman’s lawyers on Saturday that he had been told that the transcript was now finished. So evidently, it could be wrapped up almost immediately after it became a focal point of reporting critical of the Judge, Mark Fuller, on MSNBC’s Live with Dan Abrams.

The court reporter who sat through the trial was suffering with cancer and died shortly thereafter. This would have caused some delay. But I believe it was taken as cover to delay Siegelman’s appeal for half a year or longer. Given the technology available to court reporters today, this transcript could have been completed in a couple of weeks. And it was Judge Fuller’s responsibility–not to actually prepare the transcript, but to be sure that it was done. This was consistent with a series of other steps that Fuller took to slow down the process. The objective: be sure that Siegelman served as many weeks in prison as possible, before his case is reviewed and, quite possibly, thrown out."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. I hope Judge Fuller has a hobby that he enjoys.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. Court reporters don't even need high tech to read each other's notes.
If you do machine shorthand on a Stenograph, as just about everybody does nowadays, one reporter can pretty much read another reporter's notes without any problem. Everybody does not write shorthand exactly the same way, but the theory taught is generally close to standard with a few individual quirks.

The transcript should have been completed long ago. This was a stalling tactic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
23. I smell the end of a judicial career!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
25. will it be redacted?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #25
33. I just got that! LOL!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
26. kICK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
27. For those looking for it: It is in comment #7 (it is not in the article quoted)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rambler_american Donating Member (565 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
30. Kicked and recommended
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
31. K & R
busy day for moi. will be back after tomorrow! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Good luck, mod mom!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Thanks sfexpat here's my cold account:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
37. kick & recommend
thanks to you for keeping this visible!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
38. K&R. Great job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
39. A kick against those involved in the BFEE's version of a Gestapo/Politburo-we know who you are, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
40. Good news! K & R. Whoops. My R. is too late. Thanks. n/t
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 02:51 PM by Judi Lynn
:kick: :kick: :kick: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC