|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
lanlady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 12:38 PM Original message |
Computer experts point to White House failures in e-mail controversy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. Not fishy at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SpiralHawk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
2. "Smirk." - Commander AWOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. F10 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthisfreedom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
3. "I don't want you reading my personal stuff." Did someone forget to explain to this turd that the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
C_U_L8R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
5. Send a data forensics crew in there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 12:50 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. The White House System... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vyan (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 01:06 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. So they finally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thor_MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 07:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
23. I think when you are referring to the Bush White House, the proper term is "Clusterf@ck" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 01:15 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. They don't want to...it's quite obvious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
7. Bush deliberately STOPPED using email when he took office. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vyan (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Hey claimed that he doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. That I believe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. Cheney and Rove certainly did not stop using email - and theirs are the ones I want to see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
classysassy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
8. The congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftchick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
9. does bushco** pay the AP for this horseshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tom_paine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. They don't have to. AP is shot through with Bushie Paid operatives. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
15. 'missing' bwahahahahaa 'missing' bwahahaa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MaryCeleste (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
17. Its not just the piss poor WH system, its that many staffers were also using an RNC system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HowHasItComeToThis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
19. IF WE HAD A REAL CONGRESS, THERE WOULD BE HEARINGS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nc_gadfly (48 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
20. "'I don't want you reading my personal stuff,' the president explained..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
21. Ahem. It's not a failure if it's intentional. Winning through incompetence. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-03-08 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
22. Well, you phony ba---ard, we don't want you reading or hearing our |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC