Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iran calls for UN sanctions against U.S.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:24 PM
Original message
Iran calls for UN sanctions against U.S.
Tehran Times Political Desk

TEHRAN – Supreme National Security Council Secretary Saeed Jalili has urged the UN Security Council to impose sanctions on the U.S. for developing nuclear weapons.

“The Security Council must issue sanctions resolution against the U.S. which has a long record in proliferation and use of nuclear weapons,” Jalili told Japan's NHK television aired on Friday.

Iran’s top nuclear negotiator accused the United States of violating international law by using nuclear weapons against Japan, building nuclear arsenals, and proliferating atomic arms.

“According to the Article VI of the Non-Proliferation Treaty which calls for nuclear disarmament, the United States must report to the International Atomic Energy Agency on how it has obeyed international law on nuclear arms,” Jalili stated.

“Today the U.S. does not have a good image in the world. The United States is the only country which has used this inhumane weapon against innocent people… the Japanese people will surly never forget the U.S. crimes.

http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=164185
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. He has the right idea, but the wrong execution.
He should have them sanction us for the Nukes for Mangoes Deal we're making with India.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Shit are we really doing that? Nukes for Mangos?
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 09:31 PM by walldude
Geeze now I have to go to Google. Goddamn DU'ers always making me do research. :toast:


edit: Doing hell, already did:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/5219230.stm

Goddammit.. How on earth do we justify not "allowing" Iran to get nukes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It's worse than that.
Part of the deal is that we'll "fix" India's drug regulating authority to make the "equal" to our own FDA so we can import drugs from them.

Ascared yet?

It gets worse.

Bush was also working a deal to force medicare/medicaid patients into "medical outsourcing" to receive necessary surgeries in India.

Mangoes!

YUMM!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You know I always feel a bit guilty about wanting to leave
the country, then I hear about shit like this and I wonder why I am staying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Why don't you go to India? That way, you can visit all your old American friends in the hospital.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. See this thread
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 09:38 PM by IanDB1
Freepers just love Michael Moore........
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x921910


Also:

World Focus: For Them Indian Mangoes
Posted on Thursday, March 09 @ 06:40:02 VET
Topic: World News
World NewsAnatomy of an Agreement
By Vijay Prashad, counterpunch.org
Bela's Story.
http://www.trinicenter.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1303


U.S. Congress Passes India Nuclear Cooperation Bill
USIBC Launches 123 Agreement Advocacy Effort
http://64.233.169.104/search?q=cache:QvxOXpZ6FuIJ:www.usibc.com/NR/rdonlyres/es2f3xrsmxfmfmfbrwdryy24lipnq67kxfp2ekh76famjchiqcqwuwogrkv5gcrjl2hyeyhw5qwidq3mm35oh2zplzd/GlobalIndiaSpecialEditionNewsletter.pdf+India+mangoes+nuclear+medical+oursourcing&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. The US is trying
to close the barn door after the horses got out. We allowed proliferation for political and financial concerns in the past and we need to find a way to make the recipients look powerful and responsible enough to have developed their own tech without our help or lack of accountability in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. And nobody's forgotten Japan's against the world, or Germany's... Amabigassfool, just how far back
do you want to go? Never mind it is YOU who has been the aggressive one; otherwise the UN wouldn't have socked it to you with heavier sanctions!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Don't bring that up
People around here only want to hear about how hypocritical the US is. Any challenge people issue to Bush is ipso facto correct :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I think you would need to go back
a couple hundred years to find an example of Iran invading another country.

How exactly is Iran's rhetoric considered aggressive in comparison to the actions of the US and our ally?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. He's just trying to distract us from the war Bush is trying to start in Venezuela. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. The Pentagon will just
change the ingredients in the paraquat a little, start delivering it from B-52s, and claim they flew off course by accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC