Most Emailed Yahoo! News Article As Of 6 a.m. This Morning:

[Hissyspit]

[seemslikeadream]

1. ARREST BUSH AND CHENEY

[Hissyspit]

2. The "Moses Was High On Drugs" article is interesting, too...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080304/od_afp/israelreligionoffbeat

[hlthe2b]

3. Well that should start a firestorm among some..

Chuckle...

[trusty elf]

4. Interesting indeed!

The argument makes a lot of sense.

Robert Graves had similar ideas. He thought that nectar and ambrosia were "intoxicant mushrooms".

"The "gods" for whom, in the myths, ambrosia and nectar were reserved, will have been sacred kings and queens of the pre-Classical era."

[SpiralHawk]

5. There were no drugs in those days. There were plants.

Nobody had gone into the chemistry lab -- like Big Pharma -- to create synthetic shit.

If they used anything, they used plants from nature.

[Ian David]

7. A drug is any substance that changes the chemistry of your body or the way your brain works. n/t

[SpiralHawk]

9. There's a difference between what emeges from the earth, and what

emerges from a test tube...

[Ian David]

10. Yes, because anything that emerges from the earth is safe to eat. Like lead, arsenic and magma. n/t

[SpiralHawk]

11. You know people who eat rocks?

Are you from planet Republicon?

Most of us Earthlings shun that stuff...

[Ian David]

16. But they're NATURAL! Just like poison arrow frogs and those mushrooms that grow on cow poop. n/t

[nebenaube]

8. actually they we adept at making cosmetics and perfumes...

That's all one really needs to know...

[annabanana]

6. I just like the *look* of that headline...

It has a certain resonance...

[Senator]

12. Everyone Get Over There And Email, View, And Recommend

We'll have to work hard to keep it on top.

--

[EFerrari]

14. Link to story page:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080305/us_nm/usa_politics_vermont_dc;_ylt=Ap0LoqdpQd1V8ZXLMbPOLsEDW7oF

[stevedeshazer]

13. I don't want to think about McCain "clinching" anything

Ew.

[magellan]

15. Looking past Reuters' bias

The intentional slant by Reuters is highly unprofessional and just what I've come to expect of the corporate media. However, there's more than one way to read the article.

1) Only liberals are crazy enough to vote for something like this.

2) Only liberals are willing to act to defend the Constitution.

Too bad for them that by inserting their own bias, they left the door open for interpretation number 2.