Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

** Senate Judiciary Hearings on Now re: Investigating the FBI

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:19 AM
Original message
** Senate Judiciary Hearings on Now re: Investigating the FBI
Mueller is testifying.

Live web link from the Judiciary Committee website http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=3165
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. thanks for the link
watching now :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. hi minime, may need a diversion than thinking about yesterday's
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 10:23 AM by alyce douglas
primary results.

By any chance is this on C Span 1 or 2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like they are carrying any hearings on cspan3 today
House is on 1 and Senate is on 2.

I needed a distraction too, that is why I went looking for what hearings are today. If you want the entire Senate schedule, they are listed here: http://www.capitolhearings.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. K & R. Why doesn't the Bush FBI reply to communications offering evidence of political crimes?
Do NOT expect to get a response from the FBI if you offer evidence of election irregularities.

Likewise for other responsible DoJ entities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. OMG, even Grassley is accusing Mueller of stonewalling
The sky is falling, the sky is falling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. But will they punish them?
Nope it is a political move for votes in November. We Republicans care and aren't irresponsible is the message (a lie).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks for the link - watching it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
8. Please K&R . Wish more DUers would take a moment to re-focus on this Serious issue
Keep this front page today.
Duers who have become lost in the nasty Primary banter of 'mine vs. yours' are in serious need of a reality check.
THIS IS what needs focus for just one day.
Either Obama or Clinton MUST at some point deal with the slap dash methods of abuse by the Bush Admin.
There is not ONE SINGLE Dept that hasn't been tainted by the Bush free-for-all in running our American Government.
If this hearing is less significant than slinging mud at the opposing candidate then they are missing the point of what Democratic Underground is about.

-----
Kindly take a break today to focus on this Hearing.
Taking our eyes off the Bush admin for more than a week, undermines our ongoing purpose of exposing and holding accountable, someday, the corruption within our governing system.
Pay attention if you're serious about saving it at all.
---------------

Thanks for this thread...now back to the hearing.
K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. fifth rec. . the primary has been sucking all the air out of the room
while there is important business to do..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. exactly right.. Like being on the playground at noon in 3rd grade again.
Can't stand any more of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. I like that term..."sucking the air out of the room".
I agree. It is all a diversion from real issues facing our country today. It's like those baseball drug hearings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Round and round they go.
Little changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. TPM: FBI Chief: No Waterboarding Here
FBI Chief: No Waterboarding Here
By Paul Kiel - March 5, 2008 - http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/03/fbi_chief_no_waterboarding_her.php


This month, President Bush is expected to veto a Senate bill that would restrict the CIA to using interrogation techniques approved by the Army Field Manual. That would unequivocally outlaw waterboarding, the inducement of hypothermia, sensory deprivation, and other "enhanced interrogation" techniques that have been in the CIA's arsenal.

The veto is likely to survive an attempt by Senate to override because ever since 9/11, the administration and Republicans (including Sen. John McCain) have preferred to keep legal restraints on CIA interrogators loose.

But the FBI, which, unlike the CIA had ample experience with interrogation, took a different tack. During today's hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) asked FBI Director Robert Mueller why:

..............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yes, but he wouldn't say never
Their policy is no coercive technics, but they wouldn't say they wouldn't do it. Same old story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC