Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

INTERIOR DEPARTMENT STAGES GRAND CANYON GREEN WASH

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 05:38 PM
Original message
INTERIOR DEPARTMENT STAGES GRAND CANYON GREEN WASH
original-peer

For Immediate Release: March 3, 2008
Contact: Carol Goldberg (202) 265-7337

INTERIOR DEPARTMENT STAGES GRAND CANYON GREEN WASH

Exclusive Footage Offered to NBC “Today” Show to Profile High Flow Experiment

Washington, DC — The Interior Department is offering an exclusive arrangement to a network television show to showcase a controversial one-time flush of the Grand Canyon, according to documents obtained by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). Interior hopes to drown out sharp dissent from both the Grand Canyon National Park and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service that the “high-flow experiment” slated for tomorrow, March 4th, may do more harm than good.

Under the arrangement with the NBC “Today” show, a film crew will be given seats on rafts otherwise reserved for agency scientists and managers. Late last week, one Interior official underlined the perceived publicity coup:

“…just let us know what you want and we will make it happen. DOI deserves to be in the spotlight on this event – it is a tribute to the Department’s commitment to scientific understanding as the best possible route to managing and protecting our Nation’s resources.”

In fact, Interior’s top specialists feel that the experiment is a triumph of politics over science. The concern is not with the 60-hour high flow experiment itself but the condition imposed by Interior that no further high-flow flushes of the Grand Canyon occur for another five years. Thus, whatever biological benefit gained from a single surge is lost if not repeated and flows do not return to a more natural pattern.

In a February 19, 2008 letter, the Superintendent of the Grand Canyon, Steve Martin, issued a withering critique of the Interior plan, citing “significant impairment” of park resources. Two years earlier, the Fish & Wildlife Service, another arm of Interior, gave the same advice but it was ignored in forming the plan.

“While the Interior Department’s craving for any favorable media coverage is understandable, they should earn it with actual good stewardship rather than from offering some splashy footage,” stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch. “It is unlikely that the ‘Today’ show producers want a story layered with conflict and complexity for their early morning viewers.”

For the past 45 years, since the completion of the Glen Canyon Dam, the Colorado River flow through the Grand Canyon has been artificially regulated, primarily for power generation. The absence of periodic high flows has allowed sediment to build up in ways that limit habitat for canyon fish. Prior high-flow experiments have already shown the potential value of such surges. The unresolved issue is whether the Colorado River should be allowed to return to a more natural ebb and flow rhythm.

Exclusive arrangement between government agencies and the media are controversial because the government agency can shape coverage by limiting access to what is public information. In this case, however, it was the “Today” show that demanded exclusivity for the trip down river. Subsequently, other TV crews have been offered trips upriver to the Glen Canyon Dam.

“This so-called experiment ignores the results of a decade worth of research obtained with more than $80 million tax dollars,” Ruch added. “This week’s high-flow stunt is nothing but a green wash to mask another betrayal of the Grand Canyon by its political custodians.”

###















complete release including links to related sources here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. The last time they did this (1996) Lake Powell was almost at full pool.
Before the release, it was down over 100 feet from full pool and Lake Mead is down slightly more. The sites I looked at the other day suggested lake inflows to be better than 100% of normal and the Colorado snowpack, the primary source for the Colorado was at 130% of average. The lake is currently at 44% of capacity.

Perhaps they are thinking they need the room in Lake Powell in anticipation of the spring thaw in the Rockies. But there is no way one season can fill that lake back up. When the Glen Canyon dam was completed in the 1963's, it took 17 years for the lake to reach full pool, reaching the high water mark June 22, 1980.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Powell

http://lakepowell.water-data.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC