Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What else can explain this not launching impeachment?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:23 PM
Original message
What else can explain this not launching impeachment?
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/31598

Is Vanity Fair's Scoop Being Ignored Because Bush and Cheney Are Already Known to Have Committed So Many Other Crimes?
Submitted by davidswanson on Fri, 2008-03-07 04:30.
Evidence
What else can explain this not launching impeachment:

According to Dahlan, it was Bush who had pushed legislative elections in the Palestinian territories in January 2006, despite warnings that Fatah was not ready. After Hamas—whose 1988 charter committed it to the goal of driving Israel into the sea—won control of the parliament, Bush made another, deadlier miscalculation.

Vanity Fair has obtained confidential documents, since corroborated by sources in the U.S. and Palestine, which lay bare a covert initiative, approved by Bush and implemented by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Deputy National Security Adviser Elliott Abrams, to provoke a Palestinian civil war. The plan was for forces led by Dahlan, and armed with new weapons supplied at America’s behest, to give Fatah the muscle it needed to remove the democratically elected Hamas-led government from power. (The State Department declined to comment.)

But the secret plan backfired, resulting in a further setback for American foreign policy under Bush. Instead of driving its enemies out of power, the U.S.-backed Fatah fighters inadvertently provoked Hamas to seize total control of Gaza.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Vanity Fair article,
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/04/gaza200804?printable=true¤tPage=all


The Gaza Bombshell

'After failing to anticipate Hamas’s victory over Fatah in the 2006 Palestinian election, the White House cooked up yet another scandalously covert and self-defeating Middle East debacle: part Iran-contra, part Bay of Pigs. With confidential documents, corroborated by outraged former and current U.S. officials, David Rose reveals how President Bush, Condoleezza Rice, and Deputy National-Security Adviser Elliott Abrams backed an armed force under Fatah strongman Muhammad Dahlan, touching off a bloody civil war in Gaza and leaving Hamas stronger than ever.

by David Rose April 2008

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and President George W. Bush, whose secret Palestinian intervention backfired in a big way.

The Al Deira Hotel, in Gaza City, is a haven of calm in a land beset by poverty, fear, and violence. In the middle of December 2007, I sit in the hotel’s airy restaurant, its windows open to the Mediterranean, and listen to a slight, bearded man named Mazen Asad abu Dan describe the suffering he endured 11 months before at the hands of his fellow Palestinians. Abu Dan, 28, is a member of Hamas, the Iranian-backed Islamist organization that has been designated a terrorist group by the United States, but I have a good reason for taking him at his word: I’ve seen the video.

To hear an interview with David Rose and to see documents he uncovered, click here.
It shows abu Dan kneeling, his hands bound behind his back, and screaming as his captors pummel him with a black iron rod. “I lost all the skin on my back from the beatings,” he says. “Instead of medicine, they poured perfume on my wounds. It felt as if they had taken a sword to my injuries.”

On January 26, 2007, abu Dan, a student at the Islamic University of Gaza, had gone to a local cemetery with his father and five others to erect a headstone for his grandmother. When they arrived, however, they found themselves surrounded by 30 armed men from Hamas’s rival, Fatah, the party of Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas. “They took us to a house in north Gaza,” abu Dan says. “They covered our eyes and took us to a room on the sixth floor.”

The video reveals a bare room with white walls and a black-and-white tiled floor, where abu Dan’s father is forced to sit and listen to his son’s shrieks of pain. Afterward, abu Dan says, he and two of the others were driven to a market square. “They told us they were going to kill us. They made us sit on the ground.” He rolls up the legs of his trousers to display the circular scars that are evidence of what happened next: “They shot our knees and feet—five bullets each. I spent four months in a wheelchair.”

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. INCOMPETENTLY EVIL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Anything they touch turns to sh*t.
That's because they're so impulsive, instead of thinking things through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thepricebreaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Short of bush shooting a puppy on national TV - Impeachment is never going to happen. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Are you kidding? Bush could rape babies on the White House lawn and Pelosi would applaud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It DOES seem that way, doesn't it?
Still like to know whether it's intimidation, bribery, or maybe she's just been one of them all along.

Whenever someone says, "Any Dem is fine with me," remind them about Nancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. From what I understand Nancy's husband is making too much money off the war for her to oppose Bush.
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 05:38 PM by Wizard777
With everyone filling their own pockets. Apparently the Federal Government has been privatized. They just forgot to tell everyone. Maybe the Senate and House Ethics Committees are in a mass grave in Iraq. Who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. And where's the outrage over that?
Kill one person to get a bit of money and you can get the chair. Kill a million and apparently it's no big deal.

Americans are motherfucking morans (as in 'Get a Brain') for failing to notice that little discrepancy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Now Nancy is introducing legislation that benefits a company that her husband owns stock in.
That drew a little attention. But not much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H8fascistcons Donating Member (172 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Never Forget.....
Every blog, every thread should mention the Fascist criminal enablers, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reed, Steny Hoyer, Rahm Emanuel. Never Forget until they are all out of office, NEVER...

Regards..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. That wouldn't do it...
He'd have to kill it with his canine teeth, then skin, butcher and barbecue the puppy in front of the Lincoln Memorial before the goddamn mass media would cover it. But if he gave the "on air talent" and their camera crews a couple of puppy burgers, they'd "revise" the whole episode and, by the time the edited version hit the airwaves, Bush be portrayed as an animal-loving vegan who wouldn't hurt a flea, much less the puppy it rode in on.

It's truly unbelievable that Tass and Pravda have set contemporary standards for journalism that our utterly useless, co-opted, bought, paid-for, willingly complicit whores from the ministry of propaganda couldn't reach even if they had a space shuttle at their disposal.

I really don't know what could get Madame Squeaker's botoxed, $52 million-net-worth, complicit, enabling, traitorous ass to set the impeachment table.

I doubt anything could, short of Bush (or preferably Cheney) showing up on a YouTube video practicing cannibalism at a gigantic jungle feast, eating christian missionary steaks and tribal baby sausages and washing the whole thing down with the local firewater while surrounded by chanting Islamic fundamentalists claiming to be "Al Qaeda in Burkina Faso," accompanied by the dark fat guy who always shows up on those primitive videos standing in for the late bin Laden.

Better yet if he's filmed discussing with Bush/Cheney some loose ends about the next "homegrown terrorist attack" on US soil -- another Bush/Cheney/PNAC false flag production, presented by select members of the weapons, financial services, insurance and mass media industries and their parent company, GE, which brings good things to light (or "life," I never got that one straight).

And even then 19 percent of the American public would still rather have a beer with him than bust him. Is it any wonder that hardly anybody in this country can still walk and chew gum at the same time anymore?


wp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Mmmmmmm, christian missionary steaks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. And I still must ask WHY??? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Need a 2-for-1 sale on spines to get Impeachment.
Already been proven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R - someone needs to get this to KO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. Congress is protecting it's own a$$, that's why they are not impeaching.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I think your right
if they go after Bu$h then they might have to answer for their inaction and complicity. When they say they don't have time for impeachment what they really mean is they have waited too long and allowed too much to happen to say anything about it now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Complicit as the day is long.
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 06:47 PM by TheGoldenRule
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. Please send this to Keith Olbermann!
I really think he may report on this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fireweed247 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. Wasn't Kucinich going to introduce Articles of Impeachment of Bush?
Does anyone know what happened with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. He's been holding back to give Wexler a chance to work the committee
His original cheney impeachment demand is still before Judiciary (technically).

That move was made back at the State of the Union. Since he's gotten his primary challenge cleared, he may well be back in business. As Wexler has done good to get more support and petition signatures but no real change out of Conyers or others.

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. Everyone in Congress has gone deaf, dumb, blind, and stupid all at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
19. Irony is one of my favorite words...
Isn't it ironic that Bush pushed an election to get rid of a supposed terrorist group, only to have that group be elected in a free and fair election (which is more than he can say). We have no business messing around with the Palestine government. Yeah, it sucks that they may be terrorists... but their people freely elected them. We can't just get rid of people we don't like, because there's no way Dubya would still be in charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
22. two reasons impeachment is not happening, imo . . .
first, there are any number of senators and members of Congress who are every bit as corrupt and self-serving as Bush, Cheney & Company . . . they figure any attempt at impeachment will cause BushCo to reveal their own crimes and bring them down too . . .

and second, there are any number of senators and members of Congress who are simply scared shitless of BushCo and what they might do if impeachment peodeedings were begun . . . they fear that Bush might just stage another national "crisis" and invoke martial law and full dictatorial powers, including shutting down the Congress, if impeachment were put on the table . . .

together, these two groups -- the criminals and the cowards -- constitute a critical mass large enough ensure that BushCo will never be brought to justice for their crimes, no matter how horrendous or how destructive of our democracy . . . and that's not likely to change as long as corporate powers are selecting who gets elected to the House and Senate and telling them how to vote . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC