Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

26-Year Secret Kept Innocent Man In Prison (Includes a DU call-to-action)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:43 PM
Original message
26-Year Secret Kept Innocent Man In Prison (Includes a DU call-to-action)
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 06:44 PM by Texas Explorer
Alton Logan doesn't understand why two lawyers with proof he didn't commit murder were legally prevented from helping him. They had their reasons: To save Logan, they would have had to break the cardinal rule of attorney-client privilege to reveal their own client had committed the crime. But Logan had 26 years in prison to try to understand why he was convicted for a crime he didn't commit.

Logan, still in jail, speaks to 60 Minutes correspondent Bob Simon in his first interview for a report that also includes the lawyers which will be broadcast this Sunday, March 9, at 7 p.m. ET/PT.

"Yes. Sympathize with , yes. Understand it, no," Logan tells Simon. "If you know this is an innocent person, why would you allow this person to be prosecuted, convicted, sent to prison for all these years?" asks the 54-year-old inmate.

Lawyers Jamie Kunz and Dale Coventry were public defenders when their client, Andrew Wilson, admitted to them he had shot-gunned a security guard to death in a 1982 robbery. When a tip led to Logan's arrest and he went to trial for the crime, the two lawyers were in a bind. They wanted to help Logan but legally couldn't.

-snip-

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/06/60minutes/main3914719.shtml?source=mostpop_story">Continue »


This is a tragic and frustrating story. I urge and challenge DUers to contact http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/about/contacts.html">Illinois Attorney General's office tomorrow to lobby for Mr. Logan's release pending a new trial that should set him free.

Otherwise, after watching the segment on CBS' 60 Minutes just now, I'm speechless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. 1 in 99.1 Americans are in prison.
How many really should be? There seems to be plenty of law and very little justice. :-(


My husband created a website for Gary Tyler, convicted of murder in Louisiana over 30 years ago with a sham trial and coerced witnesses. He has been in Angola since he was 17. Still there. Gary and his lawyers have decided to pursue other legal avenues beyond protests to get him out, but when?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Trouble is, they got the wrong people in jail - Think Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rove, etc.,
.
.
.

But no

Nail the pot-smokers

The homeless

The poor

But not the real criminals

The ones running the USA into the ground.

USA's Government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. those lawyers were tested and they failed. I would have told, fuck
the client privilege. It is a matter of your soul and getting right with God. No way I would have shut my mouth for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. I thought priests were the only people who could legally
conceal crimes. I know that lawyers can't be compelled to testify against their clients due to privilege, but as officers of the court, I have always been under the impression that they were duty bound to report crimes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I thought that as well. This story doesn't make sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Nope.
AFAIK, the only thing that lawyers are compelled to report to authorities is if they believe that their client will commit a crime. If a crime has already been committed and they discover this via their client, then they are duty-bound to keep silent about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sounds like a conspiracy, broadly defined...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. A horrific comment on our "justice" system..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. What are the arguments for attourney-client priveledge?
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 07:41 PM by Donald Ian Rankin
Does it assist innocent defendents, or is it just there to prevent criminals being punished more harshly than is just?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. It assists the defendent, who legally speaking is *always*
innocent until proven guilty. That's really important to remember.

This was a frustrating story to watch. I think I may have risked disbarrment, myself, in order not to see an innocent man in jail for years and years.

But attorney-client privilege is part of our system for a good reason. An atty cannot adequately defend someone who cannot trust the atty with the truth. I kept wondering if there weren't some way around it - a way to talk to the judge privately and without disclosing names, say that you know the defendent is innocent... I have to assume the atty's investigated that, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. The IL attourney gen is Lisa Madigan and she has a good reputation
so with some pressure I think she will listen and act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flashl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. An innocent man will be kept imprisoned until a judge can decide
If he should be tried a second time for a crime he never committed?

This has brought back painful memories from the state-sanctioned killing of Willie Darden :(

Our justice "system" needs an overhaul :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laurier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. There's an "innocence at stake" exception to attorney-client privilege
in the UK and Canada, which would have allowed the attorneys to speak up without violating privilege in the circumstances, in order that they not contribute - through silence - to a miscarriage of justice. The US should adopt a similar exception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC