Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Spitzer question: Who ordered the wiretap? FISA smear? Siegelman 2.0?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:00 PM
Original message
Spitzer question: Who ordered the wiretap? FISA smear? Siegelman 2.0?
Just asking.

I've googled and otherwise looked around a little. I'm wondering what provoked this? republi-CON dirty tricks to take out what many are referring to as a "major rising star" in the Democratic Party? First Jewish President - now that we're in a season of historic firsts for that office - he has, up til now, been considered a key player in the future of the party. Lots of luster, lots of upward momentum, lots of potential.

Maybe I'm being paranoid. However, knowing the kinds of sneaky-ass underhanded shenanigans that go on - mainly perpetrated by the republi-CONS against our people, I can't help but wonder.

Any ideas?

Thank you in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obviously everybody is being monitored for everything
If something triggers a red flag, and somebody's got an axe to grind, you're toast. Big brother really is here. And he is malevolent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egalitariat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Maybe he got it back when he was investigating the ring.
Wouldn't that be rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Thanks for weighing in. I can't help it - I just can't help but wonder.
Somebody else here is suspicious, too:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2983628

I mean, they ARE wiretapping - what did rumsfeld once say when prompting his henchmen to try and come up with ways to connect Saddam to 9/11? "Go wide, sweep it all up".

WHO BENEFITS from something like this?

You ALWAYS have to consider who benefits from this. Granted, he's a Dem so if Spitzer resigns, the governorship would stay Democratic. But I'm just wondering. I can't help it. And wouldn't Spitzer's head look great on one of those republi-CON silver platters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Axe or no axe, I hope they just clean the decks already.
What he did was wrong, and I suspect that it's the networking that alarms me more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's sure as hell what I'm thinking.
WTF were they looking at his private finances?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. from an earlier post by KPETE, here's how ist's done.
Here's the way the whole thing works, according to Gorman: into the NSA's massive database goes data collected by the Justice Department, Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Treasury. This information includes data about email (recipient and sender address, subject, time sent), internet searches (sites visited and searches conducted), phone calls (incoming and outgoing numbers, length of call, location), financial information (wire transfers, credit-card use, information about bank accounts), and information from the DHS about airline passengers.


Then the NSA's software analyzes this data for indications of terrorist activity. When it hits upon a suspicious pattern, the NSA "feeds its findings into the effort the administration calls the Terrorist Surveillance Program and shares some of that information with other U.S. security agencies.”

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=2982898&mesg_id=2982898
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thanks - and thanks for the link also!
I've just got a really suspicious mind, considering all that I've observed of the rovians and what they're capable of - and how low they're willing to stoop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. to me this proves that they're using wiretapping for activities other than
Edited on Mon Mar-10-08 07:27 PM by notadmblnd
monitoring terrorists. This confirms that they're tapping their political enemies. Another question; I've heard Spitzer has been investigating Wall Street, you think this will halt that investigation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Well, are Paterson's priorities and his pet agenda items the same as Spitzer's?
I don't know a lot about the individuals in this case.

But your point is a good one: it DOES confirm that they're tapping people for domestic purposes. "Go wide. Sweep it all up." Perhaps that is an underlying theme for all things bush when it comes to dealing with political enemies, threats, potential threats, and perceived threats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. Paterson is a very good man.
Edited on Mon Mar-10-08 11:42 PM by BurtWorm
Too good to be governor apparently. But such is fate.


http://www.ny.gov/ltgov/index.html




David A. Paterson was elected New York’s lieutenant governor on November 7, 2006.

Elected to represent Harlem in the New York State Senate in 1985, David Paterson has demanded and achieved change at every level, not simply by what he stands for but by who he is.

In 2002, David Paterson was elected minority leader of the New York State Senate, the first non-white legislative leader in New York’s history. In 2004 in Boston, he became the first visually impaired person to address a Democratic National Convention. And 2006 saw Mr. Paterson make history again by being elected New York’s first African-American lieutenant governor.

As New York State Senate minority leader, David Paterson led the charge on several crucial issues for New York’s future, proposing legislation for a $1 billion voter-approved stem cell research initiative, demanding a statewide alternative energy strategy, insisting on strong action to fight against domestic violence, and serving as the primary champion for minority- and women-owned businesses in New York. As a result, Governor Spitzer asked Mr. Paterson to continue to lead New York State on these issues as lieutenant governor.

Lt. Governor Paterson, who is legally blind, is also nationally recognized as a leading advocate for the visually and physically impaired. A graduate of Columbia University and Hofstra Law School, Mr. Paterson also currently serves as an adjunct professor at Columbia’s School for International and Public Affairs. David Paterson lives in Harlem with his wife, Michelle, and their two children, Ashley and Alex, and he is the son of Basil Paterson, the first non-white secretary of state of New York and the first African-American vice-chair of the national Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
32. "using wiretapping for activities other than monitoring terrorists"
Ya think?

No doubt in my mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. forgive me for asking but how do hookers link into terrorists
I thought he was resigning over his connection to a high priced call girl operation,
how can the government be vacuuming up his phone records, e-mails over this, I fail
to see the "if Osama is calling someone in the US, I kinda wanta see who picks up the
phone"-snicker, snicker applies here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Well, aren't they wiretapping EVERYTHING? Just in case?
Edited on Mon Mar-10-08 07:33 PM by calimary
If I were a schemer of their caliber, I'd sure be tempted to go sifting for dirt on my enemies - both foreign AND DOMESTIC...

I'm just saying...

I just think, with these people, you can't rule ANYTHING out. You don't dare.

ALWAYS be watching. Don't EVER trust 'em. If they're up to ANYTHING, they're up to NO GOOD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Why can't Nancy Asleepatthewheel Pelosi see this?
I wish that Congress could see past the lobbyists for a change, they need to start
getting real answers on these wiretaps now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Truly. The CONS are the guys about whom the phrase "dirty tricksters" was coined.
Edited on Mon Mar-10-08 08:15 PM by calimary
If they were looking for something with which to take Spitzer out, so he wouldn't come back to bite them in the ass in some future presidential race, why wouldn't they be casting a wide net? And if THAT'S true, who else might they be targeting?

I wouldn't put ANYTHING past these people. And if they're wiretapping EVERYBODY, who knows what they might unearth? And you have to know they don't just have one lonely wonk sitting in an office with headphones on for eight hours a day. I'll bet they have a whole department full of operatives on fishing expeditions here.

Or were they targeting this prostitition ring - perhaps to see if there were political enemies in the customer base?

I just can't help but think there's something unseen in play here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. agreed that Spitzer transgressed but
they should be investigating crimes not sifting thru bank records, phone calls, e-mails, it's seems to be find the person then
find the crime, that's not what it is about and I totally dislike the trial by press corps that we have now. Scooter Libby =
nice guy = innocent, Gov. Spitzer = not nice, aggressive = guilty. I think justice is all about investigating crimes and
then looking for those who did it, the present system has turned justice on it's head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. All we need to remember is THIS IS A BUSH ADMINISTRATION
Our federal investigators cannot be trusted to NOT be used for Neocon dirty tricks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. yes, and so our justice system is tainted
we really have to get back to pre-911 thinking, this investigate us all is hurting all of us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
36. Yes, and then there is the threat factor
like Senator X we can trumpet to the press how your son was arrested on drug charges or the abortion your wife had while in college
or the fact that your dad fibbed on his taxes to save his business, there's a million coercive things they can do. I believe
that is why Prez 2/3rds opposed is so powerful still.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
28. That's a good one! Nancy Asleepatthewheel. Sure fits.
:thumbsup:

Nancy HearnoevilSeenoevilSpeaknoevil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. any Speaker of the House that could not bring impeachment
during this session has to be either clueless or willfully ignorant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. No KIDDING!!!!!
Unbelievable! ALL the criminality of the grossest kind - as far as the eye can see, and she sits on her hands.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-12-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. yes, that's why I think that the Spitzer example is so memorable
Edited on Wed Mar-12-08 06:58 PM by MissWaverly
I think that there has more than cya at play here or a desire to win in 2008, I think
there has been major bullying here to keep them in line but now for the first time
an incumbent is more likely to lose his seat than retain it, hence the Spitzer head
on a platter as an example to silence the restless crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wain Donating Member (803 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. I can't help but think
the mob is getting back at him though his weaknesses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. spitzer has so many political enemies, i can only assume he's a dumbass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. i thought there was an ongoing
criminal investigation into an international call girl or "escort service" as the swells call them. during that investigation spitzer got caught on tape arranging for an "escort girl" to fuck him...where is the big conspiracy?

if he`s so innocent why did his name come up on these tapes? maybe he should have kept his dick in his pants...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Maybe there was but I am still waiting for the trial of DeLay
remember how he was indicted in Texas and had to quit his campaign for Congress,
oh, and then there was that fella convicted of obstructing Justice, Libby, Scooter
Libby, oh, that's right, he didn't have to go to jail becuz he's a nice guy,
oh, then there was Mark Foley, and there was a lot of e-mail evidence on him
but wait the Statute of Limitations has run out on those charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Born_A_Truman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Turns out, his bank contacted the feds...
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4424507&page=1

The federal investigation of a New York prostitution ring was triggered by Gov. Eliot Spitzer's suspicious money transfers, initially leading agents to believe Spitzer was hiding bribes, according to federal officials.

(snip)

The suspicious financial activity was initially reported by a bank to the IRS which, under direction from the Justice Department, brought kin the FBI's Public Corruption Squad.

"We had no interest at all in the prostitution ring until the thing with Spitzer led us to learn about it," said one Justice Department official.

(snip)

In a interview two years ago, Spitzer, then-attorney general, told ABC News he had some advice for people who break the law. "Never talk when you can nod, and never nod when you can wink, and never write an e-mail because it's death. You're giving prosecutors all the evidence we need," he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
33. I have news for you
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 06:52 PM by MissWaverly
I have a friend in Northern Virginia who says that the Bank Manager told this person that Homeland Security goes into the bank every month and looks at every transaction of every business account that is not routine, every one, do you really want this to happen,
then this information can make the round of federal agencies like a bowl of salsa at a party. I am sorry, he may have
committed a crime by using a prostitute but I don't believe that investigations should start with a friendly chat between
your bank and the IRS or DOJ. Crimes should be investigated not people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. That's exactly right.
That's why he is referred to as "Customer #9".

This was a RICO case and he was only a customer.

They got him by accident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. I read in another thread
that the bank noticed suspicious transactions in his bank acct and notified the IRS. The story changes hourly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. Which occurred first? The wiretap or the "prostitution ring" investigation?
Edited on Mon Mar-10-08 09:51 PM by Canuckistanian
I'd say the former.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thepricebreaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. The FBI - He so happened to get caught on the tap... You are paranoid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
22. I had the same thought. They could easily monitor every Dems calls and then
prosecute them at their leisure. This might be intended to scare Congress into granting telecom immunity. As in "look they got Spitzer."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
23. shades of the Schwarzennegar recall against Grey Davis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
25. It would only be Siegelman 2.0 if Spitzer weren't actually guilty of any crime.
I'm waiting to get more info before I'm putting Spitzer in the category of innocent victim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Don't get me wrong. I'm not suggesting he's completely, or even minimally innocent here.
It appears from the evidence that he did the dirty deed.

Even so, it makes me shudder because it shows how broadly data is being collected and shared - domestically.

If the feds have their antennae up looking for all things terrorist, who knows what they'll find on anybody? And considering the track record of the US Attorney firings and other such administration malfeasance, it wouldn't at all surprise me if they started slobbering when they traced it back to a prominent Democrat.

Troubling. Troubling for all the rest of us, this is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
31. Not paranoid--you're a realist.
I'm sure Spitzer made a lot of enemies on Wall Steet. And powerful Republicans. Here is an article that appeared March 1 in the New York Magazine that you might find interesting.

http://nymag.com/news/features/44755/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adenoid_Hynkel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
37. he's still a dumbass and needs to go
for the good of the party. If he couldn't fight his crothc urges and keep his pants on with all the enemies he knew were looking for him to slip up, he has no business in office, framed or not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC