Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DIGITAL TV vs. ANALOG TV: Everything you always wanted to know about DTV but were afraid to ask...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:37 PM
Original message
DIGITAL TV vs. ANALOG TV: Everything you always wanted to know about DTV but were afraid to ask...
Digital television (DTV) refers to sending or receiving images and sound with discrete (digital) signals, instead of the analog signals currently used in broadcasting.

Beginning on October 1, 2006, along with other appropriations, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) will borrow $1.5 billion from the Treasury. The loan implements the $40 coupons consumers will hear so much about in upcoming months. (see text box at the bottom of this article for specific economic details) Will $40, which offsets purchase of a $70 piece of equipment, also defray ALL the expense consumers will bear?

In a perfect world, digital television is more flexible and efficient than analog television. When properly used by broadcasters, DTV indeed offers high quality images and sound; but with current quality so high, will enhancements in imagery truly translate into obvious improvements? For example, although proponents of DTV revel in its technical potential, digital signals will not necessarily provide higher-quality than analog signals do now. Ultimately, the quality you receive will be left up to the owners of corporate media.



Introduced in the late 1990s, digital technology appeals to the television broadcasting industry and consumer electronic businesses, because it offers a wide variety of new financial opportunities.

DTV provides these corporations numerous economic advantages over analog TV, the most significant being that digital channels take up less bandwidth. Bandwidth needs will vary, as the cost of image quality also fluctuates. This means that digital broadcasters can provide more channels in the same space and provide other non-television services such as multimedia interactivity.

DTV may also permit special services, including the multiplexing of signals. With multiplexing current convention allows the bandwidth of a DTV channel to be divided into multiple sub-channels, providing several different programming feeds on the same channel.

Reducing the bandwidth needs of stations frees up airways for police and other government agencies but does not necessarily insure better quality. A broadcaster may opt to use a standard-definition digital signal instead of a new type of HDTV signal.

Not only does DTV obsolete current High-Definition TV, it may also affect other technologies. Proposed digital technology features an ATSC tuner. If the new TVs contain only ATSC tuners, they will prevent VCRs, video games and other devices with analog RF outputs from connecting to televisions.

DTV will lack the reach of current television broadcasts. Consumers currently in range of local television broadcasts will receive diminished quality or no signal at all. For rural locations, distant analog channels that were previously acceptable in a diminished state will become unavailable.

According to Tony Wilham at the Commerce Department, standard TV will soon require new equipment offered at “Wal-mart. Best Buy and Radio Shack.” He claims the DTV will affect “13 Million TV viewers” but its impact goes far beyond standard television equipment. Older, handheld televisions, which rely on over-the-air signals, and battery operation, will become useless, since the proposed converter boxes are not portable, nor powered with batteries. Common radio will lose the ability for commuters to listen to select TV broadcasts. Portable radios which currently feature an ability to listen to a variety of television audio on VHF channels will also become obsolete.

Backed up with the force of law under the WIPO Copyright Treaty and other national legislation, digital signals will carry encryption codes, which specify use conditions, such as "may not be recorded" or "may not be viewed on displays larger than 1 m in diagonal measure.”

Digital TV picture technology is still in its early stages. DTV currently has picture defects that are not present in analog television, due to bandwidth limitations and compression algorithms.

When a compressed digital image is compared with the original program source, some hard-to-compress images are distorted. These distortions include:
quantization noise,
incorrect color,
blockiness,
a blurred, shimmering haze.

The very nature of digital receiving equipment can result in a rapid failure to generate viewable programming. With analog signals, factors such as poor antenna connections, electromagnetic interference or worsening weather may gradually fade pictures, as the quality slowly degrades. Conversely, weather and other factors cause digital signals to essentially fall off a cliff. This effect is known as the digital cliff or cliff effect.



DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Telecommunications and Information Administration


SUMMARY: In this document, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) adopts regulations to implement and administer a coupon program for digital-to-analog converter boxes. This rule implements provisions of section 3005 of Public Law 109-171, known as the Digital Television Transition and Public Safety Act of 2005. This action amends 47 C.F.R. Chapter III by adding part 301.

The Digital Television Transition and Public Safety Act of 2005 (the Act), among other things, directs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to require full-power television stations to cease analog broadcasting and to broadcast solely digital transmissions after February 17, 2009. The returned analog television spectrum is to be auctioned, and the Act directs the FCC to deposit receipts from that auction into a new Treasury Fund to be known as the Digital Television Transition and Public Safety Fund (the Fund).

Recognizing that consumers may wish to continue receiving broadcast programming over the air using analog-only televisions not connected to cable or satellite service, the Act authorizes NTIA to create a digital-to-analog converter box assistance program (Coupon Program). Specifically, Section 3005 of the Act directs NTIA to implement and administer a program through which eligible U.S. households may obtain via the United States Postal Service a maximum of two coupons of $40 each to be applied toward the purchase of a Coupon-Eligible Converter Box (CECB). To implement the Coupon Program, the Act authorizes NTIA to use up to $990 million from the Fund for the program, including up to $100 million for program administration (Initial Funds).< 4 > A contingent level of $510 million in additional funds is authorized upon a 60-day notice and certification to the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate that the initial funding level is insufficient to fulfill coupon requests for eligible U.S. households (Contingent Funds).< 5 > NTIA is, therefore, authorized to expend up to a total of $1.5 billion for the program, including up to $160 million for administration. Assuming the entire administrative amount is taken into account, $1.34 billion would be available for distributing up to 33.5 million coupons. This section also authorizes NTIA, beginning on October 1, 2006, to borrow not more than $1.5 billion from the Treasury to implement the program. NTIA must reimburse the Treasury for this amount, without interest, as recovered analog television spectrum auction proceeds are deposited into the Fund. http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/frnotices/2007/DTVFinalRule_031207.htm


Friedrich Nietzsche writes, “If you gaze too long into an abyss, the abyss will also gaze into you.” Ultimately, US consumers will soon teeter on the brink of another kind of cliff effect. Will corporate media once again be the catalyst that pushes society into the “abyss?”

Sources include; wikipedia and an interview with Tony Wilham on corporate media giant, ClearChannel Radio. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_television
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting article, if not a bit paranoid.
Though far less so than your average scare-mongering article on DTV. There are always people scared shitless by new technology, particularly when they don't really understand it.

I think the people who claim that there isn't a marked quality improvement over analog have shitty TV sets. Obviously on your average 20" SD tube TV you probably won't see that much difference, aside from a decrease in snow and interference (depending on the strength of your antenna and your location). However, on a high def flat panel there is a vast difference between analog and digital. I have a 42" Sharp Aquos LCD TV, and had over the air digital tv for about a week or two, until I could set aside time to install my cable box. I am not exaggerating when I say analog channels were damn near unwatchable on it. The flipside to that, though, is my cheap ass $10 rabbit ears from Target got me a crystal clear picture and fairly decent sound on the digital channels, that rivaled anything I had on DirecTV back east. In fact there are many HDTV owners who are perfectly content to stick with OTA digital channels and just Netflix the cable shows they want (not a solution I care for, which is why I have cable--I'd go nuts without HBO). The nice thing about this transition is that you will no longer have to pay your cable or satellite provider through the nose just to have a decent picture and sound, if that's all you want.

The point about broadcasters still having the option of using standard def signals is kind of stupid. Sure, they still have the option to do so from a technical standpoint, but from a business standpoint it'd be suicide. As HDTV prices come down and ownership goes up, demand for HDTV is going to increase and people won't be satisfied with merely standard def channels. Particularly when you can do side-by-side comparisons of SD vs. HD channels. People also won't stand for the "HD-lite" nonsense that a lot of so-called HD channels have (TNT HD, I'm looking at you), where all they do is blow up the picture and compress it, then slap widescreen bars on it.

Is there potential for abuse by the corporate media? Absolutely, every new technology is fraught with that. But that's no reason to stay in the technological dark ages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. actually if paranoia exists its because ClearChannel owns so much media and is regularly buying more
My main point is that corporate media conglomerates gain numerous economic advantages, while strapping consumers with a variety of financial burdens, during very trying times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. You obviously don't know much about where Clear Channel is now...
.. they got bought you know, and the new owners are divesting themselves of a bunch of stations and other media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. I'd heard talk of the buyout but it was out of place in the OP. The buyout creates a bigger monopoly
2 Hub firms to purchase nationwide radio giant
By Robert Gavin, Globe Staff | November 17, 2006


Two big Boston investment firms yesterday agreed to buy the nation's biggest radio broadcaster for an estimated $19 billion as financial pressures and technological change reshape traditional media companies.

Thomas H. Lee Partners LP and Bain Capital Partners LLC were the high bidders for Clear Channel Communications Inc. of San Antonio, Texas, the owner of 1,150 radio stations, including 64 in New England.

The deal, among the biggest of its kind in US history, will take publicly traded Clear Channel into private ownership.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeffersons Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. In review, the gist of this article appears to be economic...
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 09:04 AM by Jeffersons Ghost
there is some emphasis on potential drawbacks in quality but they primarily apply to people already happy with the quality they currently receive. "Will $40, which offsets purchase of a $70 piece of equipment, also defray ALL the expense consumers will bear?"

Are you somehow using the proposed type of new digital with old-style HDTV (which will soon become obsolete?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I Saw the Converter Box At Target This Weekend For $44
So, they're already not $70.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Teacher Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. How do I recommend this?...My parents are on a fixed income...
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 04:28 PM by Peace Teacher
What about people like them and the poor who are content with their current setup and can't afford new equipment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. There will be cheap boxes out there that will be $40
That's why the voucher program is in place.

https://www.dtv2009.gov
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Those vouchers aren't good for an unlimited time
They're only good for a few months following the date of receipt of the voucher.

Lots and lots of people are unaware of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillowTree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. The cost of the converter boxes runs between $40 and $100 from what I understand.
Coupons for $40 off the cost of purchasing one are available to people who can certify that they do not subscribe to cable or satellite TV service. For more information about the DTV converter box coupon program, check here: www.ntia.doc.gov.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KatyaR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. The amount of electronic devices that will become obsolete overnight is UNBELIEVEABLE.
I continue to think this is a bad, bad idea. Those of us who live in states with severe weather that develops quickly may have all kinds of problems. TV and TV broadcasts on radio are a lifeline when tornados are in the area.

Plus, at this time, I'm not sure our economy and consumers can afford this change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B3Nut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. For weather alerts, I've always preferred the radio.
At least in areas that have actual local hosts and staff on the air. Our Air America station here in Madison (92.1) is really good about keeping on top of the weather. If the sky's looking lowery, turn your radio on. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KatyaR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. The trend here the last several years has been that
when there is severe weather, the radio stations switch over to broadcasting the audio from a "sister" television station. I don't know if that will be possible once this change goes through. I need to email a TV station and ask.

Radio is probably better for weather information, but it can be helpful to have TV broadcasts to refer to as well. I'll never forget a few years ago when I was under an 18-story building waiting for a tornado to pass over and heard the TV station's weatherman yell, "get out, get out now!" The entire studio crew had to run down the hall to safety when a tornado passed over the station. They were only gone a few minutes, but it was pretty frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodinuf Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Picture/No Picture no choice
I would imagine, as with other digital technology, the surprise for people receiving TV on antennas in fringe areas will be a perfect picture or no picture. The nature of digital TV will be just like your cellphone, you hear or don't hear. With analog TV received over the air, the viewer has the option of watching a marginal quality picture through the "snow" on the screen. With digital a signal the computer makes the "choice" for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Misleading Information
you can get a Magnavox DTV converter box (TB100MW9) right now for 50 bucks, minus 40 coupon, $10 net.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. and in a couple of months, there will be at least one converter on the market for $39.95
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. actually I expect them to be free in some areas
already heard of a couple of stations that are planning on distributing free converters with the station logo and name on the box and in the over the air program guide. will still get all the channels, but will be 'brought to you by....'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. and while your at it, make your own DTV antenna
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 09:23 PM by Rosco T.
blows the socks off the commercial ones, I made one and getting stations 60+ miles away, crystal clear and none of the 'so called' picture problems in OP

http://www.digitalhome.ca/ota/superantenna/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
17. Heres a new twist for me
we have digital satelite and also a wifi hook up to shop and sons home. When the weather is bad, ie raining hard we loose both signals, tv and wifi. The wifi goes sooner than the satelite but both will be gone, like for instance here in a little while when it starts raining cats and dogs like it looks like it is fixing to do. With an antenna we get several hdtv stations now and I'm wondering if maybe we will be loosing the signal during bad weather from those stations like we do the satelite and if that is true then I have to say I like the old system better, at least it remains on for most of our storms. If it came down to it the most important purpose for our tv is to monitor our storms, its tornado alley here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC